I simply mean 1 war a month, Period.

Raids are substitute for wars in this. It would simply mean we would not lose out on organisatio nor people with tanking experience. Raids are just as good as wars fro those who want to continue their fighting habits. Also there are 3 different raids with one specializing in each of Wg their top 3 timezones.

A good, fair pkri can equal the same fun as a weekly war and we don't have to drag it out for hours.

The only reason people dislike raids is because members no longer wish to sacrifice rune due to the clan wars period we had.

I'd like to say that I formulated it wrong. I didn't mean it as in to push skillers to attend. But I was saying that there would be more of an urge to attend an important event for Wg. Seeing as these wars would usually be with our rivals or for a Raw rank.

I'm not revoicing my opinion on Emeritus activity. I've done that too many times already. Besides that's a different subject.
 
--------------------

I simply mean 1 war a month, Period.

Raids are substitute for wars in this. It would simply mean we would not lose out on organisatio nor people with tanking experience. Raids are just as good as wars fro those who want to continue their fighting habits. Also there are 3 different raids with one specializing in each of Wg their top 3 timezones.

A good, fair pkri can equal the same fun as a weekly war and we don't have to drag it out for hours.

The only reason people dislike raids is because members no longer wish to sacrifice rune due to the clan wars period we had.

I'd like to say that I formulated it wrong. I didn't mean it as in to push skillers to attend. But I was saying that there would be more of an urge to attend an important event for Wg. Seeing as these wars would usually be with our rivals or for a Raw rank.

I'm not revoicing my opinion on Emeritus activity. I've done that too many times already. Besides that's a different subject.

Ok, well, what is your favorite event? If someone told you that you could only have that event once a month, what would be your response?


 
--------------------

I simply mean 1 war a month, Period.

Raids are substitute for wars in this. It would simply mean we would not lose out on organisatio nor people with tanking experience. Raids are just as good as wars fro those who want to continue their fighting habits. Also there are 3 different raids with one specializing in each of Wg their top 3 timezones.

A good, fair pkri can equal the same fun as a weekly war and we don't have to drag it out for hours.

The only reason people dislike raids is because members no longer wish to sacrifice rune due to the clan wars period we had.

I'd like to say that I formulated it wrong. I didn't mean it as in to push skillers to attend. But I was saying that there would be more of an urge to attend an important event for Wg. Seeing as these wars would usually be with our rivals or for a Raw rank.

I'm not revoicing my opinion on Emeritus activity. I've done that too many times already. Besides that's a different subject.

Ok, well, what is your favorite event? If someone told you that you could only have that event once a month, what would be your response?

I have no favourite event.

I enjoy a good challenging raid or a fun evenly matched war. But I enjoy event like the veteran wars and Clan Quests alot more due to the fact of them not being whored to dead.
 
--------------------

Why would you quit?

Why wouldn't raids be valid for you?

If you're going to post. Atleast make sure you've actually read the topic and can form a valid argument.
 
--------------------

I simply mean 1 war a month, Period.

Raids are substitute for wars in this. It would simply mean we would not lose out on organisatio nor people with tanking experience. Raids are just as good as wars fro those who want to continue their fighting habits. Also there are 3 different raids with one specializing in each of Wg their top 3 timezones.

A good, fair pkri can equal the same fun as a weekly war and we don't have to drag it out for hours.

The only reason people dislike raids is because members no longer wish to sacrifice rune due to the clan wars period we had.

I'd like to say that I formulated it wrong. I didn't mean it as in to push skillers to attend. But I was saying that there would be more of an urge to attend an important event for Wg. Seeing as these wars would usually be with our rivals or for a Raw rank.

I'm not revoicing my opinion on Emeritus activity. I've done that too many times already. Besides that's a different subject.

Ok, well, what is your favorite event? If someone told you that you could only have that event once a month, what would be your response?

I have no favourite event.

I enjoy a good challenging raid or a fun evenly matched war. But I enjoy event like the veteran wars and Clan Quests alot more due to the fact of them not being whored to dead.

I assume you are saying you get more enjoyment out of having less wars since you take them more seriously. You cannot apply that to everyone though, I like having alot of wars because I consider the act of warring itself to be fun, not just the winning an losing aspects, nor do I enjoy it when people take warring so seriously and pressure others to put RS before IRL. So then what gives you a right to curtain my enjoyment of the game to enhance your own?

You have no favorite event, while my favorite event is warring. As such, decreasing the amount of wars hurts my enjoyment of the game much more than it improves your enjoyment of the game. Assuming that we both have a right to enjoy the game, and I stand more to lose or gain from your proposal, should not my ability to enjoy the events I want take precedence over your ability to restrict the events I enjoy?
 
--------------------

Exactly why this suggestion would never happen. We are both a warring and skilling clan, and we are not changing that.

As it stands, we have one major major war every three to four weeks, two or so less important wars per week, and several matched opts low prep wars per week. This is, overall, completely normal for a warring clan to have, and yes, we are a warring clan, thus we have warlords.

Admittedly, our number of wars have spiked in the recent week due to the new Raid Leader Trials going a little ott with trying to prove themselves, but obviously this is only temporary, thus the 'trial'.

~Mugger84
 
--------------------
Mugger84
Member Of WG Since 4th April 2008.
WG Raid Leader Since 20th June 2008.
WG Council Since 20th November 2008.
Banned from WG Since 6th March 2009.
DF IG Since 6th March 2009.
DF FA Since 15th March 2009.
Ex-Member Of WG Since 26th March 2009.
Member of DF Since 6th April 2009.
Clan Friend of WG Since 4th June 2009.
---
||Ex-WG Warlord || Current Member of DF || Ex-Rampage Leader ||

Exactly why this suggestion would never happen. We are both a warring and skilling clan, and we are not changing that.

As it stands, we have one major major war every three to four weeks, two or so less important wars per week, and several matched opts low prep wars per week. This is, overall, completely normal for a warring clan to have, and yes, we are a warring clan, thus we have warlords.

Admittedly, our number of wars have spiked in the recent week due to the new Raid Leader Trials going a little ott with trying to prove themselves, but obviously this is only temporary, thus the 'trial'.

~Mugger84

We are not a warring clan. We in general focus on both PvP, PvE and community events. PvP includes events such as fight pits, castle wars, Bounty Hunter, Raids and wars. There are many different Fighting 'Sector' events.

Actually the real Wg lies in raids since it is why Wg was first made. To protect the skillers in the wild. Raids would be done to clear the wild in our name. Wars were reserved for those we held grudges against or to simply advance in the ranks/challenge ourselves. (Wg vs Rune outlaws and Wg vs Valor to give an example of both.)

Even if we do major wars why do all the smaller wars? It simply drives away raids and people ignore them to an extent. Also people will get bored more easily and wars will just simply another war.

Some of the replies I'm going to simply ignore since it was obvious you simply didn't read my post past the first paragraph.

If you are simply too lazy to read the whole post I don't even care about your opinion and don't bother to reply.

@Karl: I'll post/edit in a response later. Too tired from revising atm.
 
--------------------

So you are saying that we wont raid as much, because our main purpose (protecting the innocent) is gone?
Why can't we have raids for fun? and show our strength to other clans.

But like BTO said, our attendance to raids sucks.
So our raids arn't that good most of the times, lack of people, we run into bigger clans...

So once again, our problem is the failing activity...
 
--------------------
http://www.myspace.com/ZitherBand Support my Friends!

Wg never did this many wars (Please note: I am talking 2-3+ Years back, Before clan wars arena) If you do not believe me feel free to check the photo archives of 2005,2006, Begin 2007 on the main website.

The idea of it improving attendance isn't simply a theory but is something I've observed from happing and when I was there myself.

Also if you need numbers. Now back then we Pulled 125 out of 1 members (with emeritus) That is 68% (Rounded upwards). In the last big war wg had they pulled 45 out of 120 members (With emeritus, an estimate of 80 members + 40 emeritus) That's 38% (Rounded upwards).

Also if it's one war a month people will be more likely to turn up at raids if they're really such fighting orientated. Raids are a tradition and it's what Wg was first made out of. Telling us to neglect them because members are too scared to lose rune is simply not right. Members have gone soft from the clan wars era and simply lost their determination of fighting in a raid since they'll just be able to up their attendance count through the wars and not bother to attend raids.


 
--------------------