. : News : . . : Message of the Week : .
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.

These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only.

For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE.
"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home."
~His Lordship
War Alert: OFF Raid Alert: OFF
PM a WG Official

Pages: (2) 1 [2]

 Ok, this REALLY has to stop.
Posted: December 7, 2009 04:32 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: ThisIsUnique
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 1664
Member No.: 1417
Joined: October 30, 2008
Total Events Attended: 141
keanu half of the posts on this topic r urs, stop it ...

I had to leave after i died twice because it was 11 pm when i had exams the next day. <= valid reason is valid
that was like when we ran into gladz at altar
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: December 7, 2009 04:41 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Dallar
Group: Event Leader
Posts: 1899
Member No.: 1957
Joined: July 16, 2009
Total Events Attended: 137
Was there the whole time but I didn't come on TS because I was on the phone with my dad. Haven't spoken to him for one year and a half because he lives in the U.S..
I wasn't 100% focused at this event but at least I showed up and did what I had to.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Click me if you need cheering up - I guarantee happiness will blossom

Posted: December 7, 2009 05:47 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Jenny
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 1967
Member No.: 19
Joined: December 29, 2007
Total Events Attended: 56
Keanu...you like to spam the shit out of a topic with useless, unappreciated comments.
They waste my time.

I apologize I couldn't attend the raid, had a family time tree decorating session.
 
--------------------
user posted image


user posted image

Posted: December 7, 2009 06:23 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: DG_Keanu
Group: Council
Posts: 4782
Member No.: 2033
Joined: August 25, 2009
Total Events Attended: 173
QUOTE   ThisIsUnique @ December 07, 2009 05:32 pm)

keanu half of the posts on this topic r urs, stop it ...

Half? I count 4 out of 28 posts, and if that's "spamming the shit out of" a topic, we're all fucked. At least mine weren't either "I agree" or an excuse for leaving early.
 
--------------------
user posted image
[05:42] <+WG_Keanu> I think I got a semi just looking at the pic
[05:42] <%kat> same

Posted: December 7, 2009 06:25 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Jenny
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 1967
Member No.: 19
Joined: December 29, 2007
Total Events Attended: 56
Not this just topic but most of the topics on these forums.

<3
 
--------------------
user posted image


user posted image

Posted: December 7, 2009 07:53 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname: Sxe_Asher
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 276
Member No.: 2130
Joined: November 14, 2009
Total Events Attended: 15
QUOTE   Littledanish @ July 10, 2009 05:44 am)

time to enforce a new rule... 2 hour attendance to a raid or you don't get attendance?... like honestly that was the most ridiculous thing ever, we ran into gladz and like 1/4 of our ops was gone then within 15 minutes after that we had maybe 15 people left?... ridiculous and quite unacceptable.

This doesn't work at all. Some raids aren't even 2 hours long.

What if someone can stay for an hour and 45 minutes? do they not deserve the attendance? What about an hour and a half?


 
--------------------

Posted: December 7, 2009 08:14 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: DG_Keanu
Group: Council
Posts: 4782
Member No.: 2033
Joined: August 25, 2009
Total Events Attended: 173
QUOTE   Sxe Asher @ December 07, 2009 08:53 pm)

QUOTE   Littledanish
July 10, 2009 05:44 am

time to enforce a new rule... 2 hour attendance to a raid or you don't get attendance?... like honestly that was the most ridiculous thing ever, we ran into gladz and like 1/4 of our ops was gone then within 15 minutes after that we had maybe 15 people left?... ridiculous and quite unacceptable.

This doesn't work at all. Some raids aren't even 2 hours long.

What if someone can stay for an hour and 45 minutes? do they not deserve the attendance? What about an hour and a half?

I'll keep that in mind Jen <3

I agree with Asher (for once lmao), a set duration for attendance points on raids (or anything for that matter) isn't the solution. We need to rethink the events first, as I said before - we lost attendance after we changed the style of the raid and stopped catering for what the members want to do to have fun and enjoy themselves.

Fighting NI fairly deep when there's a good chance of ownage, a semi-decent opponent and the opportunity to get some good drops is something I'd be more than willing to sacrifice a few sets for. Fighting huge clans down in shallow with single and safe spots everywhere I'm not so keen on. Maybe others think the same?
 
--------------------
user posted image
[05:42] <+WG_Keanu> I think I got a semi just looking at the pic
[05:42] <%kat> same

Posted: December 7, 2009 08:34 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Dnovelta
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 2750
Member No.: 130
Joined: January 20, 2008
Total Events Attended: 137
QUOTE   WG_Keanu @ December 07, 2009 12:14 pm)

QUOTE   Sxe Asher
December 07, 2009 08:53 pm

               
             
QUOTE  Littledanish
July 10, 2009 05:44 am

time to enforce a new rule... 2 hour attendance to a raid or you don't get attendance?... like honestly that was the most ridiculous thing ever, we ran into gladz and like 1/4 of our ops was gone then within 15 minutes after that we had maybe 15 people left?... ridiculous and quite unacceptable.

This doesn't work at all. Some raids aren't even 2 hours long.

What if someone can stay for an hour and 45 minutes? do they not deserve the attendance? What about an hour and a half?

I'll keep that in mind Jen <3

I agree with Asher (for once lmao), a set duration for attendance points on raids (or anything for that matter) isn't the solution. We need to rethink the events first, as I said before - we lost attendance after we changed the style of the raid and stopped catering for what the members want to do to have fun and enjoy themselves.

Fighting NI fairly deep when there's a good chance of ownage, a semi-decent opponent and the opportunity to get some good drops is something I'd be more than willing to sacrifice a few sets for. Fighting huge clans down in shallow with single and safe spots everywhere I'm not so keen on. Maybe others think the same?

I agree with Keanu on the point that events aren't really doing what is fun. Unless we've got the options, we can't hold ourselves in the low levels of the wilderness because people our level will be able to tank us long enough to teleport out or eat up and get to a safespot. There isn't any fun in running between BH and CWA for two hours getting maybe five kills.

The problem then lies in the fact that that scenario is what people think of when you said "raid". So people think up a reason to not go and then the raid can't actually go any deeper because there aren't enough people.

I remember a system we used back in the day, where if we didn't get enough people, the entire event was canceled. We'd mass up in Edgeville, and then the event would get called off because we didn't have 20 people there. We didn't want to have to hunt level 10 wilderness because the chance of escape is large because a single mistake is fatal. Instead we either went deep, or stayed out.

I think we should employ that system, and see how it works, even if for just a few events. Start hosting raids, and calling them off if not enough people show up. The people who always attend will get the short end of the stick here, yes, but we already know their hearts are in the right place, and I'd hope they'd understand what the system is meant to do. Then people who so graciously make the time for WG will start to get frustrated, at which point they'll understand how the first group felt EVERY raid - getting ready for basically nothing. The goal is to get enough people to realize that they actually ARE hurting the clan by not attending events, because as it stands there is no clear repercussion for skipping an event. Maybe a verbal or forum warning, but that's just to the individual. If they start to see events getting canceled because there aren't enough people, they'll know it was them and one of two things will happen:
1) They change because they feel guilty
2) They leave because they feel guilty

Both are in WG's interest.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: December 8, 2009 01:25 amTop
   


IRC Nickname: Mmangler
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 1595
Member No.: 1580
Joined: December 24, 2008
Total Events Attended: 165
I read some very good information here. Raiding seems to be an open ended experience with some pretty flexible goals. I believe there should be a set mission and a set amount of time for the mission. People make time for these events and in some instances cannot stay longer. Unfortunately, sometimes that is at the time of fight. I believe people started dropping out after an hour. Was it because we went shallow? Started dieing? I suspect it was the time but who knows.
 
--------------------

Posted: December 8, 2009 03:21 amTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 7306
Member No.: 47
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 343
The best part is people feel guilty enough to post excuses but the people not posting excuses are often your worst cases.
 
--------------------
July 5, 2007 - June 27, 2011

Posted: December 8, 2009 10:21 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Kung_man149
Group: Higher Guardian
Posts: 1054
Member No.: 2111
Joined: October 30, 2009
Total Events Attended: 79
i wasnt there due to a BIG family emergency..my grandmother was admitted to the hospital due to a heart attack so me and my mother were there with her for the entire day sorry i couldnt make it guys
 
--------------------
Taken❒ Single❒ Mad✔
<+Mark``> i think the brothers GF is going into labour
<+Mark``> I WANNA WATCH YU-GI-OH
user posted image
user posted image

Pages: (2) 1 [2]