. : News : . . : Message of the Week : .
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.

These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only.

For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE.
"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home."
~His Lordship
War Alert: OFF Raid Alert: OFF
PM a WG Official

Pages: (2) 1 [2]

 Robbie's look at our situation.
Posted: December 25, 2009 08:02 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Wayne|Eregion2
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3087
Member No.: 156
Joined: January 25, 2008
Total Events Attended: 8
Imo, I think you've got it backwards. Concentrating on winning at the possible expense of the community is always what drives us down. But when we put the community first, we succeed in other areas because people are vested in what we're doing. It's the same reason a happy workplace is a successful workplace, while not all successful workplaces are really comfortable places to work.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: December 25, 2009 09:23 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Chimpy
Group: Banned
Posts: 2521
Member No.: 1474
Joined: November 16, 2008
Total Events Attended: 133
QUOTE   Eregion2 @ December 25, 2009 03:02 pm)

Imo, I think you've got it backwards. Concentrating on winning at the possible expense of the community is always what drives us down. But when we put the community first, we succeed in other areas because people are vested in what we're doing. It's the same reason a happy workplace is a successful workplace, while not all successful workplaces are really comfortable places to work.

I don't think we're expending any of our ocmmunity on winning. And winning makes everyone happy, the whole spirit of the clan is uplifted. If you've ever won a big fight with WG, which I'm sure you have, you know that nothing compares to that feeling, and how much the clan morale benefits.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: December 25, 2009 09:57 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Sgtswordfish
Group: Guest
Posts: 1737
Member No.: 1758
Joined: March 9, 2009
Total Events Attended: 64
the way i see it. if we cannot walk out of a loss as winners then winning is pointless. there will always be losses and wins. what matters most is the intregrity in which we embark our efforts on.



 
--------------------
user posted image
Goals 2011
user posted image

Posted: December 25, 2009 10:33 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Wayne|Eregion2
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3087
Member No.: 156
Joined: January 25, 2008
Total Events Attended: 8
QUOTE   Chimp Y
December 25, 2009 04:23 pm

               
             
QUOTE  Eregion2
December 25, 2009 03:02 pm

Imo, I think you've got it backwards. Concentrating on winning at the possible expense of the community is always what drives us down. But when we put the community first, we succeed in other areas because people are vested in what we're doing. It's the same reason a happy workplace is a successful workplace, while not all successful workplaces are really comfortable places to work.

I don't think we're expending any of our ocmmunity on winning. And winning makes everyone happy, the whole spirit of the clan is uplifted. If you've ever won a big fight with WG, which I'm sure you have, you know that nothing compares to that feeling, and how much the clan morale benefits.

Tbh, I know you've been here for over a year, but imo you haven't been here long enough to see what I'm talking about. It's a pretty dismal disconnect, since you guys have no idea what WG used to be like or what we once achieved. I don't mean to play the old school card too heavily, but seriously, you guys have no idea.

And when the people who have been here for years, like Robbie, speak up from a position where they can bring YEARS of experience to the situation, they get roasted by people who can't comprehend what WG used to be. So while you guys go chasing a momentary high from winning wars, the true spirit of WG is being crushed.

The fact that so many of us who don't even play RS anymore are so keen on these discussions about WG should be proof enough that what we once experienced, and what we would like to share with all the rest of you today, is so absolutely phenomenal compared to what WG is today that we can't even hope to explain it to anyone.

It wouldn't be a problem if we saw the new schoolers doing things which are new or innovative, but all anyone ever does is the same old shit. We KNOW it doesn't work but not enough people ever listen, and there's never enough of us old schoolers around to influence the rest of you so WG goes around in a constant spiral.

We're trying to help you. We're showing you what we know and what we know you need to know. But no one ever listens. No one even tries. Even a little experiment, a 1-month trial of new ideas; but no, it's just WIN WIN WIN RECRUIT RECRUIT RECRUIT. Don't you see you can get it all and more if you'd just let yourself believe?
QUOTE   sgtswordfish)

the way i see it. if we cannot walk out of a loss as winners then winning is pointless. there will always be losses and wins. what matters most is the intregrity in which we embark our efforts on.
Well spoken.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: December 26, 2009 12:08 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Chimpy
Group: Banned
Posts: 2521
Member No.: 1474
Joined: November 16, 2008
Total Events Attended: 133
QUOTE   Eregion2 @ December 25, 2009 05:33 pm)

QUOTE   Chimp Y
December 25, 2009 04:23 pm

               
             
QUOTE  Eregion2
December 25, 2009 03:02 pm

Imo, I think you've got it backwards. Concentrating on winning at the possible expense of the community is always what drives us down. But when we put the community first, we succeed in other areas because people are vested in what we're doing. It's the same reason a happy workplace is a successful workplace, while not all successful workplaces are really comfortable places to work.

I don't think we're expending any of our ocmmunity on winning. And winning makes everyone happy, the whole spirit of the clan is uplifted. If you've ever won a big fight with WG, which I'm sure you have, you know that nothing compares to that feeling, and how much the clan morale benefits.

Tbh, I know you've been here for over a year, but imo you haven't been here long enough to see what I'm talking about. It's a pretty dismal disconnect, since you guys have no idea what WG used to be like or what we once achieved. I don't mean to play the old school card too heavily, but seriously, you guys have no idea.

And when the people who have been here for years, like Robbie, speak up from a position where they can bring YEARS of experience to the situation, they get roasted by people who can't comprehend what WG used to be. So while you guys go chasing a momentary high from winning wars, the true spirit of WG is being crushed.

The fact that so many of us who don't even play RS anymore are so keen on these discussions about WG should be proof enough that what we once experienced, and what we would like to share with all the rest of you today, is so absolutely phenomenal compared to what WG is today that we can't even hope to explain it to anyone.

It wouldn't be a problem if we saw the new schoolers doing things which are new or innovative, but all anyone ever does is the same old shit. We KNOW it doesn't work but not enough people ever listen, and there's never enough of us old schoolers around to influence the rest of you so WG goes around in a constant spiral.

We're trying to help you. We're showing you what we know and what we know you need to know. But no one ever listens. No one even tries. Even a little experiment, a 1-month trial of new ideas; but no, it's just WIN WIN WIN RECRUIT RECRUIT RECRUIT. Don't you see you can get it all and more if you'd just let yourself believe?
QUOTE   sgtswordfish)

the way i see it. if we cannot walk out of a loss as winners then winning is pointless. there will always be losses and wins. what matters most is the intregrity in which we embark our efforts on.
Well spoken.

Well I don't know the oldschool stuff, and you don't know anything about the current clan world. We're both handicapped in that sense. And we are trying to push through things that are new and innovative, just things that you disagree with tface.gif.

QUOTE

We're trying to help you. We're showing you what we know and what we know you need to know. But no one ever listens. No one even tries. Even a little experiment, a 1-month trial of new ideas; but no, it's just WIN WIN WIN RECRUIT RECRUIT RECRUIT. Don't you see you can get it all and more if you'd just let yourself believe?


Sure Id happily try you/robbies idea for a month or two. I'm willling to try anything. But I highly doubt it would work.

Look the clan world is changing, ALOT. From 2006, the clan world memberwise has easily been cut in half, maybe more. Top clans are closing left right and center, every month it seems. DI, Se, EH, RDC, FoF, and numerous other top 10 clans and mid-sixed clans that I didn't mention. We have to stay competetive in this ever changing clan world, if you want to be competetive, we have to be atleast alright at wars to have a stable member base. People aren't looking for weak clans that have a decent community anymore, many are looking for solid pking clans that they can have fun in. Many top clans have excellent communities, and are also obviously very good at pking. YOU CAN HAVE BOTH. Good clans aren't just these black voides that suck away people's soles and makes people slaves to pking.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: December 26, 2009 12:43 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Wayne|Eregion2
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3087
Member No.: 156
Joined: January 25, 2008
Total Events Attended: 8
QUOTE   "Chimp Y")

Warring ability is the best way to bolster our community. When was our community the best? Not when we were a small-midsized clan, but when we were a POWERHOUSE.
That argument isn't anything new. But saying a great war record will make a great clan is like saying great sex will make a great relationship. There's no cause or effect going on there, all the sex does is make you want to put up with the other bullshit enough to ignore it. The relationship (aka; community) should come first and the great sex (aka; wars) will follow.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: December 26, 2009 12:45 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: DG_Keanu
Group: Council
Posts: 4782
Member No.: 2033
Joined: August 25, 2009
Total Events Attended: 173
QUOTE   Eregion2 @ December 26, 2009 01:43 am)

QUOTE   "Chimp Y")

Warring ability is the best way to bolster our community. When was our community the best? Not when we were a small-midsized clan, but when we were a POWERHOUSE.
That argument isn't anything new. But saying a great war record will make a great clan is like saying great sex will make a great relationship. There's no cause or effect going on there, all the sex does is make you want to put up with the other bullshit enough to ignore it. The relationship (aka; community) should come first and the great sex (aka; wars) will follow.

I think everyone pretty much agrees on that now. Prioritizing the community over becoming a powerhouse is the way to go, let's do it, before we change our minds.
 
--------------------
user posted image
[05:42] <+WG_Keanu> I think I got a semi just looking at the pic
[05:42] <%kat> same

Posted: December 26, 2009 02:30 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: RobbieThe1st
Group: Founder
Posts: 770
Member No.: 2
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 49
QUOTE   Flame Outlaw @ December 25, 2009 04:30 pm)

The warring/raiding brings them in. The community keeps the around.

But you see, it doesn't happen. If that happened, then great. But, what really happens is that the warring/raiding brings them in... and then they end up with less time and become emeritus. They only end up sticking around to become moral support, because of all these activity requirements.

Now, I'm not saying that we should lose all wars and do horribly at raids. Thats not fun, for anyone.

What I am saying is that we shouldn't try to follow the path of "recruit high levels, super activity, raiding constantly". We should not fight people on their turf, by there rules.
If we have a large number of 105s, and other clans have the same number of 118s, we all agree that it won't be a fair fight, correct? What we should do is only fight people who give us a fair handicap of one sort or another.
Also, don't fight matched opts. Only fight full-out. If we fight full out against a smaller clan who expects to win because they know we won't pull more than say 30% of our memberlist, and we end up pulling 50%... well, we have a good chance of winning.
As such, lets make it so that weekly expected attendance is less... but occasional attendance is expected, especially for extremely important events. If we have a ranked war that we have been preparing for for 6 months, and its -the- event, everyone might get up at 4AM on a school day to come. But if it happens -every- two weeks or so, why bother?
Also, instead of levels, we should focus on organization. We should have our higher levels(who have been around for a while) do specific things in wars, increase tactics and communication - we can do a lot with that.

I want you guys to go look up the DOA war - Lordy created a frigging flash video showing the tactics we were going to be using. Yet, since then, I have only seen that same prep tactic used a handful of times. Its sad. Now, instead of counting on a highly-organized force of lower levels, we have a bunch of half-trained high levels, and it obviously hasn't helped.

----------
One more point:
You all seem to act as if recruiting high levels will solve all our problems. All I have to say is go look at our history. All these ideas and more have been tried, with varying levels of success. If one idea had worked extremely well, don't you think it would be in use today?

-Robbie


 
--------------------
Old Avatar - Paypal donation link
user posted image
I am left handed, and proud of it! Retired from RuneScape.
Old forum posts: 2275(s4+s10+wg.com)+1759(z6 old account)+474(z6 new account) Total: 4508
Join date: 4/16/05 | Get Firefox 3.5 now: http://www.getfirefox.com | RobbieSwich for Firefox

Posted: December 26, 2009 11:53 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: DG_Keanu
Group: Council
Posts: 4782
Member No.: 2033
Joined: August 25, 2009
Total Events Attended: 173
QUOTE

Also, don't fight matched opts. Only fight full-out.


Thank you! Even Gene himself said our strength is in numbers and outpulling the other clan but all I've seen nowadays is matched matched matched dry.gif
 
--------------------
user posted image
[05:42] <+WG_Keanu> I think I got a semi just looking at the pic
[05:42] <%kat> same

Posted: December 26, 2009 03:40 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Chimpy
Group: Banned
Posts: 2521
Member No.: 1474
Joined: November 16, 2008
Total Events Attended: 133
QUOTE   WG_Keanu @ December 26, 2009 06:53 am)

QUOTE

Also, don't fight matched opts. Only fight full-out.


Thank you! Even Gene himself said our strength is in numbers and outpulling the other clan but all I've seen nowadays is matched matched matched dry.gif

At our present state, if we fight a clan relatively our size and we fight full out, they will outpull us and outlevel us. And most clans aren't always loooking for full outs, even top clans do matched opts just to keep their skills up. It's great for practicing king.gif.

QUOTE

But you see, it doesn't happen. If that happened, then great. But, what really happens is that the warring/raiding brings them in... and then they end up with less time and become emeritus. They only end up sticking around to become moral support, because of all these activity requirements.

How would we know if it doesn't happen? We've never been consitantly good since way back when we were a powerhouse, and it seemingly worked then eh? When the summer started up this year, we started doing very well in p2p, and people on RSC and other fansites saw that, and we had a good many intros/apps come in.

And No, they don't end up with less time. People that actually like pking and warring, want more and more of it, like in the summer, we couldn't get enough of p2p raiding. None of them feel like they have less time to do anything irl, because they love being active in the PvP aspect of their clan. Our activity requirements are jack shit compared to other clans that pk 5-7 times a week, and have around 2 wars, and often a PKRI. That's a little much, however we raid max like 3 times a week, and have maybe one more. THAT'S NOTHING. That takes up max 7 hours out of your whole week, if you make it to all of them which is unlikely.


QUOTE

What I am saying is that we shouldn't try to follow the path of "recruit high levels, super activity, raiding constantly". We should not fight people on their turf, by there rules.

wat. It's about being good, so we might actually be able to fight said clans.

QUOTE

If we have a large number of 105s, and other clans have the same number of 118s, we all agree that it won't be a fair fight, correct? What we should do is only fight people who give us a fair handicap of one sort or another.

Those are hard to get.

QUOTE

As such, lets make it so that weekly expected attendance is less... but occasional attendance is expected, especially for extremely important events. If we have a ranked war that we have been preparing for for 6 months, and its -the- event, everyone might get up at 4AM on a school day to come. But if it happens -every- two weeks or so, why bother?

Well for one thing, we don't have a weekly expected attendance...and why should we make it less when hardly anyone is even active as it is? This just brews overall clan inactivity and event skipping. And by not having many wars or pking, you're just asking everyone that's serious about warring and pking to leave. And I agree, we should stick to small matched opts fights for the most part, only having big wars about every 3-4 weeks.

QUOTE

Also, instead of levels, we should focus on organization. We should have our higher levels(who have been around for a while) do specific things in wars, increase tactics and communication - we can do a lot with that.

It's hard to be organized when all of the low levels are getting koed left right and center, and before you can do anything half your clan is dead while you only dropped 1-2 from the other clan. And often sneaky tactics only go so far, it's usually just the basics, binding, transitioning, tanking, that wins the day.

QUOTE

I want you guys to go look up the DOA war - Lordy created a frigging flash video showing the tactics we were going to be using. Yet, since then, I have only seen that same prep tactic used a handful of times. Its sad. Now, instead of counting on a highly-organized force of lower levels, we have a bunch of half-trained high levels, and it obviously hasn't helped.

Again, the clan world is very different now. Back then alot of clans had quite low reqs, lower than today anyways. Nowadays, most real clans have higher reqs. This was also from what I believe, a war in which nobody returned, nowadays, pretty much all clans would have returned in a war like that, which would've made tactics like that very effectivei n the beginning, but nowadays it would be easy for the other clan to recover from that, and call a regroup and be an effective fighting force again. It also doesn't matter as much what levels they are when there is like 100v100 people, however we can never hope to pull that much nowadays.

QUOTE

You all seem to act as if recruiting high levels will solve all our problems. All I have to say is go look at our history. All these ideas and more have been tried, with varying levels of success. If one idea had worked extremely well, don't you think it would be in use today?

I don't think it will solve ALL of our problems. And most don't work because Lordy doesn't agree with them, so it's doomed to failure from the outset.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: December 26, 2009 03:48 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: ThisIsUnique
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 1664
Member No.: 1417
Joined: October 30, 2008
Total Events Attended: 141
QUOTE   WG_Keanu @ December 26, 2009 06:53 am)

QUOTE

Also, don't fight matched opts. Only fight full-out.


Thank you! Even Gene himself said our strength is in numbers and outpulling the other clan but all I've seen nowadays is matched matched matched dry.gif

There are not many clans that we can overpull
most clans that we can overpull wont war us because our ml is to big. We need to get rid of the inactives.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: December 26, 2009 03:51 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: leecable
Group: Banned
Posts: 1938
Member No.: 410
Joined: April 1, 2008
Total Events Attended: 178
QUOTE   WG_Keanu @ December 26, 2009 06:53 am)

QUOTE

Also, don't fight matched opts. Only fight full-out.


Thank you! Even Gene himself said our strength is in numbers and outpulling the other clan but all I've seen nowadays is matched matched matched dry.gif

Well, we tried numbers at the DW war, and you low levels failed to tank. So yea, numbers doesnt work anymore.
You lower levels generally cant tank, which loses us wars. And some of you are basically refusing to train. So like, Yea, cool.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image user posted image

Posted: December 26, 2009 06:28 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Snowzak
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 1193
Member No.: 5
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 67
Don't try to change WG according to your ideas, make your ideas match with WG to make it evolve for the best. Planning to achieve the effects of three years of slow evolving with a few radical changes will not work.

Build with what you have, don't destroy to try to rebuild.
 
--------------------
user posted image

London RL Meeting attendee - Paris RL meeting attendee
Joined WG in October 2005 - Original DG - Ex-Raid Leader
Proud Council Member from October 21st 2007 to May 19th 2008

Posted: December 26, 2009 07:18 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Lefty
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3340
Member No.: 1055
Joined: June 30, 2008
Total Events Attended: 211
Yet again, everyone is referencing top clans. They are not where we are now, so don't compare us to one.

Also, these clans that have closed have mainly closed because of their leaders. Their leaders get busy in real life and they do not want to see anyone else leading their clan. If we have Eugene behind us, we can only succeed.

EDIT: In reference to Wayne's post at the top of this page, I can relate to that completely. Anyone that lives in south-east United States (Alabama, Georgia, Florida) should know of the grocery store Publix. The company is constantly ranked in the top 10 and top 20 in corporation rankings based on customer service, while they have prices higher than other giants such as Wal-Mart, Target, and other local grocery stores around the United States. I tell you that right now, Publix is pushing out grocery store chains that have been around my town for the past 20 years JUST because the customer service is worth the extra pay.

People will pay more money in real life to shop at a happier place, making it a more successful place. If we have a happy clan and community, we will attract people. We can always get them into warring. Trust me, I know Darth and I both came into WG being complete noobs at warring, and I didn't even like combat or warring. Now I love it. You just have to draw them into the community.
 
--------------------
user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image
user posted image
user posted image

Pages: (2) 1 [2]