The Wilderness Guardians

. : News : .	. : Message of the Week : .
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums. These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only. For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE.	"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home." ~His Lordship
War Alert: OFF	Raid Alert: OFF
PM a WG Official	Search:

IRC Nickname: DZ
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 2991
Member No.: 18
Joined: December 29, 2007
Total Events Attended: 238

I hope I am one of those two Emeritus!

--------------------
Now back to the good part!

IRC Nickname: Lefty
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3340
Member No.: 1055
Joined: June 30, 2008
Total Events Attended: 211

I wanna be a special, trustworthy Emeritus!

--------------------
user posted image

IRC Nickname: megajayson
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 9246
Member No.: 423
Joined: April 4, 2008
Total Events Attended: 216

when does the voting end?

--------------------
user posted image

This is ten percent luck, twenty percent skill
Fifteen percent concentrated power of will
Five percent pleasure, fifty percent pain
And a hundred percent reason to remember the name!

7th Highest Overall for Wars Attended.

IRC Nickname: Indivi2you
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 5361
Member No.: 43
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 623

Just as Randy says that emeritus might vote for or most likely will vote for their heartfelt friends, I strike another problem.

If you're making a rule not to allow emeritus members to vote, you shouldn't allow new members to vote. They know pretty much shit. They vote for their own friends or whoever they believe is the coolest. Not only does this occur in council elections this happened in everything that "members" are allowed to vote upon.

Set a requirement that only members that joined over 2 months ago or something may vote.

Be fair, because you obviously are not.

--------------------
The First, The Last, and the Only ~FLO
Never say never, because limits, like fears, are often just an illusion. ~Michael Jordan
user posted image

IRC Nickname: Zooby
Group: Guest
Posts: 1669
Member No.: 1464
Joined: November 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 109

QUOTE: Indivi2you @ November 24, 2010 08:34 pm)

Just as Randy says that emeritus might vote for or most likely will vote for their heartfelt friends, I strike another problem.

If you're making a rule not to allow emeritus members to vote, you shouldn't allow new members to vote. They know pretty much shit. They vote for their own friends or whoever they believe is the coolest. Not only does this occur in council elections this happened in everything that "members" are allowed to vote upon.

Set a requirement that only members that joined over 2 months ago or something may vote.

Be fair, because you obviously are not.

Be a active guardian, obviously you are not.

--------------------
A Revolution without dance is a Revolution not worth having at all

Lightbulbs die my sweet, I will depart

IRC Nickname: Indivi2you
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 5361
Member No.: 43
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 623

QUOTE: Zooby69 @ November 24, 2010 11:45 pm)

QUOTE: Indivi2you November 24, 2010 08:34 pm

Just as Randy says that emeritus might vote for or most likely will vote for their heartfelt friends, I strike another problem.

If you're making a rule not to allow emeritus members to vote, you shouldn't allow new members to vote. They know pretty much shit. They vote for their own friends or whoever they believe is the coolest. Not only does this occur in council elections this happened in everything that "members" are allowed to vote upon.

Set a requirement that only members that joined over 2 months ago or something may vote.

Be fair, because you obviously are not.

Be a active guardian, obviously you are not.

At least I don't go around flaming to make a point.

Be a good guardian, obviously you are not.

P.S. - nice grammar.

--------------------
The First, The Last, and the Only ~FLO
Never say never, because limits, like fears, are often just an illusion. ~Michael Jordan
user posted image

IRC Nickname: Kiwi011
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3052
Member No.: 40
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 21

QUOTE: Indivi2you @ November 25, 2010 03:48 pm)

QUOTE: Zooby69 November 24, 2010 11:45 pm

QUOTE: Indivi2you November 24, 2010 08:34 pm

Just as Randy says that emeritus might vote for or most likely will vote for their heartfelt friends, I strike another problem.

If you're making a rule not to allow emeritus members to vote, you shouldn't allow new members to vote. They know pretty much shit. They vote for their own friends or whoever they believe is the coolest. Not only does this occur in council elections this happened in everything that "members" are allowed to vote upon.

Set a requirement that only members that joined over 2 months ago or something may vote.

Be fair, because you obviously are not.

Be a active guardian, obviously you are not.

At least I don't go around flaming to make a point.

Be a good guardian, obviously you are not.

P.S. - nice grammar.

+1

--------------------
user posted image

IRC Nickname: WizardOfGod
Group: Banned
Posts: 808
Member No.: 2429
Joined: October 13, 2010
Total Events Attended: 40

QUOTE: Indivi2you @ November 25, 2010 10:48 am)

QUOTE: Zooby69 November 24, 2010 11:45 pm

QUOTE: Indivi2you November 24, 2010 08:34 pm

Just as Randy says that emeritus might vote for or most likely will vote for their heartfelt friends, I strike another problem.

If you're making a rule not to allow emeritus members to vote, you shouldn't allow new members to vote. They know pretty much shit. They vote for their own friends or whoever they believe is the coolest. Not only does this occur in council elections this happened in everything that "members" are allowed to vote upon.

Set a requirement that only members that joined over 2 months ago or something may vote.

Be fair, because you obviously are not.

Be a active guardian, obviously you are not.

At least I don't go around flaming to make a point.

Be a good guardian, obviously you are not.

P.S. - nice grammar.

Nice use of spell check zooby made a valid point no need to attack him god dam your not an active guardian look at your user title thats all he's pointing out here im not getting into it with you im just explaining his post that you clearly took to the heart

--------------------
user posted image

Finally the #1 fisher in WG :)

Wilderness Guardian's Top Fighters

F2P Safe- Levylov
F2P Dangerous- Levylov
P2P Hybridding- Ching
P2P Dangerous- Ching
P2P Safe- Levylov
Wanna take these ranks down join the 1v1 ladder!
http://www.wildernessguardians.com/forum/i...showtopic=22029

IRC Nickname: megajayson
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 9246
Member No.: 423
Joined: April 4, 2008
Total Events Attended: 216

yo guys, this is council voting and you guys are flaming each other over activity. get over it guys.

its a pointless arguement

@Zooby - Saad served as part of the staff for quite awhile before leaving the game, not the clan. He is quite active as an emeritus compared to some others. And he would know what is better for the clan alot more than you as you lack the experience in the staff that he has.

but

@Saad - you are still emeritus and dont get to see or be involved in everything that happens throughout each day in the clan, which does make it hard for you to judge on who would make a good council. You only get to see what you see on the forums and on those little moments you pop on IRC or the occasional event.

Personally I would let everyone in the clan vote, as it's still their clan. It isn't like old people arn't allowed to vote in federal elections because they are old.

But rules are rules, and without them, we be a bunch of pirates

Arrrrrrrrrrrr

--------------------
user posted image

This is ten percent luck, twenty percent skill
Fifteen percent concentrated power of will
Five percent pleasure, fifty percent pain
And a hundred percent reason to remember the name!

7th Highest Overall for Wars Attended.

IRC Nickname: DG_Keanu
Group: Council
Posts: 4782
Member No.: 2033
Joined: August 25, 2009
Total Events Attended: 173

QUOTE: Jayson @ November 26, 2010 11:15 pm)

Personally I would let everyone in the clan vote, as it's still their clan. It isn't like old people arn't allowed to vote in federal elections because they are old.

I'ma hit the constructive debate.

The old people are allowed to vote because federal elections directly affect them. But WG is a RuneScape clan, and Emeritus are for members who don't play RuneScape. If I was Emeritus, I wouldn't expect to be able to vote.

--------------------
user posted image

[05:42] <+WG_Keanu> I think I got a semi just looking at the pic
[05:42] <%kat> same

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129

Emeritus members are here for the community, not for warring or recruitment or most matters that council are in charge of.

Votes are counted.
A winner has been decided.
Rachel will have the honours.

I'm not forwarding the results unless absolutely necessary - if someone thinks I rigged it. The reason I'm not forwarding it is because there is no quick way. I have to forward every single PM to 4 people.

--------------------
user posted image

IRC Nickname: Abs
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 2071
Member No.: 4
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 97

I agree on Emeritus not being able to vote.
I also nulled my vote as I was Emeritus up until very recently.
I agree that there are certain Emeritus that actually read the applications & make an informed decision that would clearly help the clan, however that is a minority and there are too many Emeritus who will make impulse decisions based on outdated knowledge on the clan.

Therefore it will do more bad than good.

~Abs

--------------------
user posted image

"I may not agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
Wg Council & Secondary Leader - 21/10/07 to 24/12/08
Msn: [email protected]