. : News : . . : Message of the Week : .
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.

These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only.

For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE.
"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home."
~His Lordship
War Alert: OFF Raid Alert: OFF
PM a WG Official

Pages: (2) [1] 2

 Application Process
Posted: May 1, 2008 07:11 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Mickey
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 5305
Member No.: 48
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 282
Ok so, I was looking at the app forum. And I can't help thinking that it's all the more easier to get into WG. Where is our prestige?

We had alot less members getting banned and leaving when they had to work their ass off to get into this clan.

Bring back the thing about intros, where your intro can't just be like 5 lines. My intro's where both over 6 paragraphs long.

And just saying "add suchandsuch" so they can apply. Thats not good enough. The whole point of introing is so that people get to know WG. Just adding them for a picture isn't getting to know them.. It also degrades our commuint a little.

Please take this into consideration.

~Madd
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: May 1, 2008 08:01 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Kwaichi
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 1827
Member No.: 65
Joined: December 31, 2007
Total Events Attended: 119
Yes i agree with you, the should write a bit more. It looks more magnificently, and if you are joining you should think about why you want to join and what will be your duties when you join the clan - like a trial guardian. By think thinking help writing more about you and your RS history and so on. Although writting long articles can discourage applicants.
Also there is a quistion: Do we need lazy members who cannot write few more lines in thier application ?
But dont forget that some paragraphs arent written now, such as about No honour clans or antirpking codex.
Good suggetion thumbsup.gif
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: May 1, 2008 08:03 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Mickey
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 5305
Member No.: 48
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 282
QUOTE (Kwaichi @ May 01, 2008 08:01 am)
Yes i agree with you, the should write a bit more. It looks more magnificently, and if you are joining you should think about why you want to join and what will be your duties when you join the clan - like a trial guardian. By think thinking help writing more about you and your RS history and so on. Although writting long articles can discourage applicants.
Also there is a quistion: Do we need lazy members who cannot write few more lines in thier application ?
But dont forget that some paragraphs arent written now, such as about No honour clans or antirpking codex.
Good suggetion thumbsup.gif

WG is was still an AR-PKing clan. It's part of our history. It would help them to know that.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: May 1, 2008 08:58 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: [JC]
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3320
Member No.: 23
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 147
Looks at my council app....

Oh Applications is one of the topics I cover hash.png

Yes I agree our application system has become very easy, Refferals in particular are becoming a joke when all people say is something like "he's my mate, let him in" which clearly gives us no indication of what the member will be like once they are in WG.

I have been keeping an eye on members that have got in via the refferal system lately, and of our Trails, the least active ones seem to be people who have got in via the 'Refferal' system.

I also dislike people asking for me to add X, it is the kindof request that I will do as a favour, but its not like I can say no without looking really mean? If you really want someone to add a friend you should PM them (here or IRC) and say "hey I met this guy, they're really nice/experienced/active, you should talk to him".

WG at the moment has very few members leaving, and has a decent influx of newer members both joining and joined recently, I definitely think the Refferal system needs a revamp, but I also think we should look at the other factors that are important when letting new members in.

Another potential idea would be to require at least one of the people in their FL photo to reffer the member before being accepted. This person whould obviously not be the same person that reffers them if they are getting in via that method.

This 'new friend' refferal could allow us to see how the person is fitting in with WG even when only recently joined. I would expect a photo refferal to bring up things like:

-Friendliness
-Activity (Have they been on Irc much? In game? Forums?)
-Attitude

On another point I also think our current trial system is not doing so well. At the moment our trials are practically getting a free ride, with not a huge amount of monitoring on how long they take to get their required attendance.

I do have a variety of plans, including the potential return of the mentoring system, to try and solve this problem, hopefully if I get council I will be able to bring them into action.

~Evil
 
--------------------
user posted image

Old awards wat
Most Mature & Most Honourable
Most Dedicated|IRC Freak|Best Emeritus
Placeholder lolz

Posted: May 1, 2008 09:16 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Pazenon
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 1477
Member No.: 33
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 79
I hate how easy it is to get in WG these days. I had my application closed more than once, and had it re-written a couple of times.

There should be some strictly set minimum word limit in both Introductions and Applications.
 
--------------------

Posted: May 1, 2008 09:22 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Mickey
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 5305
Member No.: 48
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 282
QUOTE (Pazenon @ May 01, 2008 09:16 am)
I hate how easy it is to get in WG these days. I had my application closed more than once, and had it re-written a couple of times.

There should be some strictly set minimum word limit in both Introductions and Applications.

That used to be the case when you had to apply on the clan website. It was like minimum 100 words for why you want to join.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: May 1, 2008 09:31 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: [JC]
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3320
Member No.: 23
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 147
QUOTE (Maddness990 @ May 01, 2008 09:22 am)
QUOTE (Pazenon @ May 01, 2008 09:16 am)
I hate how easy it is to get in WG these days. I had my application closed more than once, and had it re-written a couple of times.

There should be some strictly set minimum word limit in both Introductions and Applications.

That used to be the case when you had to apply on the clan website. It was like minimum 100 words for why you want to join.

Word limits on app answers have been opposed, and I do agree in a way. If you say "you must write 100 words" people will try to write 100 words, but it may mean that their idea's get diluted while they try to fill it up to the minimum.

I like to explain my idea's fully, but some just like to give a basic overview in fewer words so word limits are detrimental for them.

Allot at the moment is left up to the Application manager's to decide, and I like it that way because their judgement is generally good.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Old awards wat
Most Mature & Most Honourable
Most Dedicated|IRC Freak|Best Emeritus
Placeholder lolz

Posted: May 1, 2008 09:57 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Pazenon
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 1477
Member No.: 33
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 79
QUOTE (Theevildead2 @ May 01, 2008 09:31 am)
QUOTE (Maddness990 @ May 01, 2008 09:22 am)
QUOTE (Pazenon @ May 01, 2008 09:16 am)
I hate how easy it is to get in WG these days. I had my application closed more than once, and had it re-written a couple of times.

There should be some strictly set minimum word limit in both Introductions and Applications.

That used to be the case when you had to apply on the clan website. It was like minimum 100 words for why you want to join.

Word limits on app answers have been opposed, and I do agree in a way. If you say "you must write 100 words" people will try to write 100 words, but it may mean that their idea's get diluted while they try to fill it up to the minimum.

I like to explain my idea's fully, but some just like to give a basic overview in fewer words so word limits are detrimental for them.

Allot at the moment is left up to the Application manager's to decide, and I like it that way because their judgement is generally good.

The benefits of having a minimum limit are far more better than the benefits of not having a limit.

There could always be a compromised solution between the two.
 
--------------------

Posted: May 1, 2008 10:39 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: General199
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 1073
Member No.: 318
Joined: March 11, 2008
Total Events Attended: 0
If its harder to get into Wg it should make it mentally harder to leave Wg. Personally I also think the applications needed to be made a tad bit harder of a process just so that the appliers will get to know us better!
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: May 1, 2008 11:20 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Me9
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 459
Member No.: 59
Joined: December 31, 2007
Total Events Attended: 51
I concur with the issue on how easy it is to get into WG.

How about members actually getting to vote whether the applicant should be let in or not? Maybe not right after he posts his application but maybe in place of the 'Graduation' process?

For example,
- if 90% of the votes is "Yes, let him/her in", then the applicant should be accepted.
- if 75-89%, then it is up to the Council to decide
- and if below 75%, then it's an auto decline for the applicant.


I feel that this way, the applicants need to work their way around being active and getting along well with members, maintaining healthy relationships and good attitudes. thumbsup.gif


 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
-The End-

Posted: May 1, 2008 11:47 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: [JC]
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3320
Member No.: 23
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 147
QUOTE (Me9alomaniac @ May 01, 2008 11:20 am)
I concur with the issue on how easy it is to get into WG.

How about members actually getting to vote whether the applicant should be let in or not? Maybe not right after he posts his application but maybe in place of the 'Graduation' process?

For example,
- if 90% of the votes is "Yes, let him/her in", then the applicant should be accepted.
- if 75-89%, then it is up to the Council to decide
- and if below 75%, then it's an auto decline for the applicant.


I feel that this way, the applicants need to work their way around being active and getting along well with members, maintaining healthy relationships and good attitudes. thumbsup.gif

I personally dont support the idea of the clan voting on letting a particular member. Often only the council has a true picture of the impact a member has had within the clan, and some members are in unusual timezones which means they may not be seen as active even when they are.

If the mentoring system returns I would look at a forum (or subforum in the graduation forum), with a thread on each member to discuss positive or negative incidents regarding trial member's untill they graduate (which would then be added into an archive once they graduate). This would give members a more private way to express their feelings regarding their graduation, be they good or bad.

I do feel that member's oppinions are incredibly important when considering a Graduation, however at the moment there is really no way for them to express them without letting the trial member in question see it as well. Since at the end of the day members have to get along with new applicants we should aim to find a better way to include them.

~Evil
 
--------------------
user posted image

Old awards wat
Most Mature & Most Honourable
Most Dedicated|IRC Freak|Best Emeritus
Placeholder lolz

Posted: May 1, 2008 03:10 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Guests
Posts:
Member No.: 0
Joined: January 1, 1970
Total Events Attended: 1
Whoa. that is soo true.. Madd ftw wink2.gif
 
--------------------

Posted: May 1, 2008 03:52 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Me9
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 459
Member No.: 59
Joined: December 31, 2007
Total Events Attended: 51
QUOTE (Theevildead2 @ May 01, 2008 11:47 am)
QUOTE (Me9alomaniac @ May 01, 2008 11:20 am)

:
How about members actually getting to vote whether the applicant should be let in or not? Maybe not right after he posts his application but maybe in place of the 'Graduation' process?
.
.
I feel that this way, the applicants need to work their way around being active and getting along well with members, maintaining healthy relationships and good attitudes. thumbsup.gif

I personally dont support the idea of the clan voting on letting a particular member. Often only the council has a true picture of the impact a member has had within the clan, and some members are in unusual timezones which means they may not be seen as active even when they are.

If the mentoring system returns I would look at a forum (or subforum in the graduation forum), with a thread on each member to discuss positive or negative incidents regarding trial member's untill they graduate (which would then be added into an archive once they graduate). This would give members a more private way to express their feelings regarding their graduation, be they good or bad.

I do feel that member's oppinions are incredibly important when considering a Graduation, however at the moment there is really no way for them to express them without letting the trial member in question see it as well. Since at the end of the day members have to get along with new applicants we should aim to find a better way to include them.

~Evil

Actually thinking about it now, it is pretty true. I've experienced some faults with voting systems, where members get influenced by what others comment and went "If it's true what XXX says, then I vote no".

What you suggested (in yellow) is pretty cool, it allows members to bring up issues they have with Trials or commend them. Then the council should have the final say on whether they graduate or not based on our inputs.

One thing though. I dont believe "only the council has a true picture of the impact a member has had within the clan", like you said, hah. Thing is, I noticed that a number of our members judge people heavily on their activity only. Look at the WG Seasonal Awards for example, lol.

I believe this shouldn't be the case. We need to really look at the overall picture, the activity, the contributions and involvement, the attitude and so on. A few of us already practice this though. Gotta preach this shiate to everyone else in the clan! user posted image
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
-The End-

Posted: May 1, 2008 04:35 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Guests
Posts:
Member No.: 0
Joined: January 1, 1970
Total Events Attended: 1
Guys this is a cycle that always happens.
1. We make apps easy.
2. Someone says they are too easy.
3. We make apps hard.
4. Less people join.
5. Someone points out that not enough are joining.
6. We make apps easy.
etc...


One of the most stupid things about the RS clan world in my opinion is requiring someone to wait extended amounts of time or type huge amounts of words to get into a clan. Sure they should type more than "I want to join" but don't make them write a freaking essay on it.

A member is not better if he waits longer, he does not want in more, he is just more patient. Patience is a one quality amongst dozens. You can't make it the most important one and make the others worthless, they are ALL representative of a member's quality.

Require people to attend a clan event before joining, that would be what I say. They need to ask people when one is and get invited. It proves that they can make friends and contacts and that they play RS.

I know that it is one option already but make it mandatory. That's the only change I would make.

I like the idea of a forum to discuss trials too.
I don't like voting processes for already mentioned reasons, but discussions are good.
 
--------------------

Posted: May 1, 2008 06:22 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Mickey
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 5305
Member No.: 48
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 282
QUOTE (Tmal34 @ May 01, 2008 04:35 pm)
Guys this is a cycle that always happens.
1. We make apps easy.
2. Someone says they are too easy.
3. We make apps hard.
4. Less people join.
5. Someone points out that not enough are joining.
6. We make apps easy.
etc...


One of the most stupid things about the RS clan world in my opinion is requiring someone to wait extended amounts of time or type huge amounts of words to get into a clan. Sure they should type more than "I want to join" but don't make them write a freaking essay on it.

A member is not better if he waits longer, he does not want in more, he is just more patient. Patience is a one quality amongst dozens. You can't make it the most important one and make the others worthless, they are ALL representative of a member's quality.

Require people to attend a clan event before joining, that would be what I say. They need to ask people when one is and get invited. It proves that they can make friends and contacts and that they play RS.

I know that it is one option already but make it mandatory. That's the only change I would make.

I like the idea of a forum to discuss trials too.
I don't like voting processes for already mentioned reasons, but discussions are good.

Patience is good in this clan though. There alot of things in this clans that require it. I think that patient members are needed in this clan. It minimises fueds among people because they are having to wait for something. Like when we were doing realy bad with our wars. People didn't have enough patience to stick around.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: May 1, 2008 07:05 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname: Spicy63
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 785
Member No.: 50
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 0
QUOTE (Maddness990 @ May 01, 2008 06:22 pm)
QUOTE (Tmal34 @ May 01, 2008 04:35 pm)
Guys this is a cycle that always happens.
1. We make apps easy.
2. Someone says they are too easy.
3. We make apps hard.
4. Less people join.
5. Someone points out that not enough are joining.
6. We make apps easy.
etc...


One of the most stupid things about the RS clan world in my opinion is requiring someone to wait extended amounts of time or type huge amounts of words to get into a clan. Sure they should type more than "I want to join" but don't make them write a freaking essay on it.

A member is not better if he waits longer, he does not want in more, he is just more patient. Patience is a one quality amongst dozens. You can't make it the most important one and make the others worthless, they are ALL representative of a member's quality.

Require people to attend a clan event before joining, that would be what I say. They need to ask people when one is and get invited. It proves that they can make friends and contacts and that they play RS.

I know that it is one option already but make it mandatory. That's the only change I would make.

I like the idea of a forum to discuss trials too.
I don't like voting processes for already mentioned reasons, but discussions are good.

Patience is good in this clan though. There alot of things in this clans that require it. I think that patient members are needed in this clan. It minimises fueds among people because they are having to wait for something. Like when we were doing realy bad with our wars. People didn't have enough patience to stick around.

They didn't leave them because of Patience,
They left because they thought there deserved better for less work.

As Tmal said, Patience is just one aspect, there are so many more things that a Members should have, Patience being miniscule compared to any others.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: May 1, 2008 07:11 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Guests
Posts:
Member No.: 0
Joined: January 1, 1970
Total Events Attended: 1
Oh patience is indeed important, particularly with how many random fights come up in WG.

However, to make it the primary focus, which is what making waiting periods, greater introduction times, etc is, would be a shame because that is not necessarily all we are looking for.

I think a good member to WG is:

-Respectful
-Active
-Patient
-Open to posting on forums
-Familiar with IRC
-Enjoys both non wild and wild events.

If they meet those conditions they should be fine.
The question is how to find out if they meet those conditions in the easiest way for them possible. If it is easy, they apply, if we find out their qualities, we only accept the best.

If it comes down to asking them one question, then it comes down to one question. Making them do more for the sake of doing more proves NOTHING.
 
--------------------

Posted: May 1, 2008 07:18 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname: Spicy63
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 785
Member No.: 50
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 0
A few months ago (Maybe a Year, I'm not exactly sure, it's been up and donw with the system) when the Mentor system was in place,

The Mentor's would have to approve of their assigned Mentee before applying.

Another thing idea comes to mind, I'd give examples if I could get one the Z6 forums, oh well. Anyway,

When we had Promotions for Higher and Elite Guardians, when you actually had to Apply for the promotion you would have to receive Sponsors from Higher Guardians (If you were Apping for Higher), Elite guardian or higher (If you were Apping for Elite). The Sponsor would consist of a One to Two Paragraph post explaining why he would sponsor that Member.

Higher Guardian needed 8 Sponsors, Elite needed 10 I believe.

Since recieving Membership into WG is much more than just a promotion I propose about 15-18 Sponsors needed, Four or more of those being in a Leadership Position (Event Co-ord/Mod/Raid Leader/Council/Primary)

Edit, this would require the Applicant/Trial to do no more than what he thinks is neccesary. If that's enough or not will be up for WG to decide.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: May 1, 2008 07:30 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Guests
Posts:
Member No.: 0
Joined: January 1, 1970
Total Events Attended: 1
I think there are some current WG members who are not familiar enough with 15-18 members to get their sponsorship.

That inevitably delays things too due to waiting for that many to reply.
But whatever works, I just don't want to see the length increased simply for the sake of claiming it is tough to get in.
 
--------------------

Posted: May 1, 2008 07:37 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname: Spicy63
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 785
Member No.: 50
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 0
QUOTE
I think there are some current WG members who are not familiar enough with 15-18 members to get their sponsorship.


They wouldn't need to be extremely close for that Sponsorship.

But a set number of Sponsors would have to reply to their 'Graduation'.
I did set it relativly high in my suggestion but that number could always be altered.

The Member wouldn't have to ask each of the Sponsors personally,
But just like some of us Filter through Intro's and post on the Topics, Members would look thorugh the Graduation forums as suck and post, being one of their sponsors, including their Analysis of the Member (Why they chose to Sponsor them).

Tallying the Sponsors and Promoting to an Official Guardian could be part of the App Manager Position.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: May 1, 2008 07:46 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: rachellove
Group: Council
Posts: 6955
Member No.: 173
Joined: January 31, 2008
Total Events Attended: 305
I will try to get to know more intros but it is hard when they dont come onto irc or leave friends to on I try to greet people in the lobby too

Changing the way we take apps alot is not a good thing imo

How well can we know someone in just a few days Maybe make the wait to trial guardian a lil longer to be sure they are lasting type person

I didn't join myself til I knew more people and still have alot to get to know better
 
--------------------
user posted image
Thank you Garrett and Dallar.
“The day soldiers stop bringing you their problems
is the day you have stopped leading them.
They have either lost confidence that you can help them
or concluded that you do not care.
Either case is a failure of leadership.”
~~Colin Powell ~~

user posted image

Posted: May 1, 2008 08:22 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Abs
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 2071
Member No.: 4
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 97
Just leave it as it is, it's already come up before, App Managers do know that there is a certain line that an Application must cross before being allowed to enter.

I want to keep that line low. Why fix the fixed, we're doing well, I don't want to change that.

~Abs
 
--------------------
user posted image
"I may not agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
Wg Council & Secondary Leader - 21/10/07 to 24/12/08
Msn: [email protected]

Posted: May 1, 2008 08:52 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname: Kero2|bryan
Group: Guest
Posts: 1302
Member No.: 91
Joined: January 2, 2008
Total Events Attended: 26
milklaugh.gif i made a super long intro for fun when i was boerd took 30 minutes but 2 page length didnt bother posting.
 
--------------------
Best pure f2p Guardian
user posted image

Post here
http://www.wildernessguardians.com/forum/i...owtopic=20&st=0

user posted image
user posted image

Posted: May 1, 2008 09:25 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname: [Randy]
Group: Raid Leader
Posts: 5065
Member No.: 16
Joined: December 29, 2007
Total Events Attended: 499
QUOTE (Abmanju @ May 01, 2008 04:22 pm)
Just leave it as it is, it's already come up before, App Managers do know that there is a certain line that an Application must cross before being allowed to enter.

I want to keep that line low. Why fix the fixed, we're doing well, I don't want to change that.

~Abs

I agree.

Ya know, most people join a clan to have fun, but the thing is, we don't want people to stop having fun for writing an essay. Like myself, not everyone is a talented writer. Long word requirements can be a put off to a lot of people, although they may have a lot more to offer than words.

However, there is a line on the word requirements. "I want to join and have fun" is not acceptable. Something short and sweet but right to the point can say just as much as an essay filled with things that are not important.
 
--------------------

user posted imageuser posted image

Posted: May 2, 2008 01:20 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Me9
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 459
Member No.: 59
Joined: December 31, 2007
Total Events Attended: 51
QUOTE (Kingrandy0 @ May 01, 2008 09:25 pm)
QUOTE (Abmanju @ May 01, 2008 04:22 pm)
Just leave it as it is, it's already come up before, App Managers do know that there is a certain line that an Application must cross before being allowed to enter.

I want to keep that line low. Why fix the fixed, we're doing well, I don't want to change that.

~Abs

I agree.

Ya know, most people join a clan to have fun, but the thing is, we don't want people to stop having fun for writing an essay. Like myself, not everyone is a talented writer. Long word requirements can be a put off to a lot of people, although they may have a lot more to offer than words.

However, there is a line on the word requirements. "I want to join and have fun" is not acceptable. Something short and sweet but right to the point can say just as much as an essay filled with things that are not important.

True enough, application processes - where someone comes in and applies to join the clan, shouldn't need to be changed. Essays and stuff are a tad too much but what happened to the discussion I had with Evil? About how the graduations need to change?
(Replies No. 9,10 & 12)

Tmal responded, Spicy mentioned something regarding the use of referrals for promotions and graduations. That's cool. However, although this encourages Trials to get to know full members, I see it potentially being abused just like how current applicants need people to add for their screenshots. How they'd go up to a random member,go "Hi, ref me plz. Much love <333" and there you go- the process becomes redundant.

Also, personally, about the part Spicy said on 'Applying' for promotions - I feel it is rather queer. Promotions should be come as rewards for what one has done, you shouldn't be applying for em, lol. confused.gif


P.S. I hope people actually read posts in between. I take time to actually read through what people say, think and post a reply, it can get disappointing when people don't, lol.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
-The End-

Pages: (2) [1] 2