| . : News : . | . : Message of the Week : . |
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.
These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only. For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE. |
"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home." ~His Lordship |
|---|---|---|
| War Alert: OFF | Raid Alert: OFF | |
PM a WG Official |
||
Posted: July 14, 2008 01:56 pm  | |||
      IRC Nickname: Yingy Group: Clan Friend Posts: 2205 Member No.: 27 Joined: December 30, 2007 Total Events Attended: 21    | Rsname: Yingyang06 Please copy & paste the "Warned on" date - [This will tell us which warning level you want us to remove, you can find this at the top of the warning level - Warned on July 14, 2008 01:59 am Who were you warned by?: - Tmal34 Please write your defence to this warning level - (This must contain some type of evidence and must be quite lengthy, providing the misunderstanding and evidence to prove it
As alot of you know ever since i joined the Wilderness Guardians myself and parth have been at each others necks. To long have a sat back and watched those who tell me to go cut myself or to go die. Quikdrawjoe is the same, i had circumstancual evidence, 2 chat logs and a screenshot of him telling me to go die, to this day he still flames me. The same goes for Parth. He has been banned from WG before, i have sat kindly not flaming him back, keeping my distance and reporting it to the council, yet nothing was done about it. So i decided to flame back, he has upset more than me and i stood up to him, no one else does. This resulted in his ban from the Wilderness Guardians yet again and gave me a 20% warn, yes i warrent it for flaming him back but under the circumstances i should not get this warn. I did what anyone does when they are backed into a corner, i fought back and i won. Over the past year Parth has been finding ways to flame me whether it on topics or on IRC. He cost me a friend. If he is unbanned or allowed to return as ex-member then i shall leave this clan. -------------------- Friend's Forver The Long Road Ahead - 91/99 Prayer   | ||
Posted: July 14, 2008 08:40 pm | |||
 IRC Nickname: Mickey Group: Emeritus Posts: 5305 Member No.: 48 Joined: December 30, 2007 Total Events Attended: 282 | He indeed doesn't deserve it. Parth went too far and Simon was forced to defend himself. Good luck getting it removed Simon. --------------------    | ||
Posted: July 14, 2008 10:26 pm | |||
| IRC Nickname: Group: Guests Posts: Member No.: 0 Joined: January 1, 1970 Total Events Attended: 1 | As I said in the warn level, it was not the first, it was the 2nd time you had reacted. The other time was in level 1 I believe and I had to clean probably 10 replies with you too bickering back and forth calling each other fags. I really have nothing against you, but you can't get away with retaliating like that twice. Parth was banned because what he does was worse, but you replying is not right and I do not believe you should still be a "perfect" member with 0% when you replied. No problem with this getting removed in the future, I'm sure it will, I think it is too soon for now though. I'll let someone else decide officially though. -------------------- | ||
Posted: July 14, 2008 11:36 pm | |||
 IRC Nickname: Trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls Group: Banned Posts: 2956 Member No.: 422 Joined: April 4, 2008 Total Events Attended: 130 | I personally believe the warn level should stick. I have nothing personal against Simon, however he DID react twice, and no matter how many times you react, two wrongs simply do not make a right. In my opinion he flamed an (At the time) member of the clan and should therefore have the warning level. We shouldn't adopt the policy of 'Oh well if he flames you first you can by all means flame him back'. ~Mugger84 -------------------- Mugger84 Member Of WG Since 4th April 2008. WG Raid Leader Since 20th June 2008. WG Council Since 20th November 2008. Banned from WG Since 6th March 2009. DF IG Since 6th March 2009. DF FA Since 15th March 2009. Ex-Member Of WG Since 26th March 2009. Member of DF Since 6th April 2009. Clan Friend of WG Since 4th June 2009. --- ||Ex-WG Warlord || Current Member of DF || Ex-Rampage Leader ||  | ||
Posted: July 17, 2008 12:41 am | |||
| IRC Nickname: Group: Banned Posts: 2447 Member No.: 114 Joined: January 8, 2008 Total Events Attended: 149 | I agree with Mugger. There are other options rather than flaming back. Putting the other person on ignore is one of them. Also, my opinion is to let the warn level stay a week, then remove. For something like this... It can serve as a reminder to keep your temper. -------------------- | ||
Posted: July 17, 2008 10:42 pm | |||
 IRC Nickname: bto Group: Emeritus Posts: 3815 Member No.: 196 Joined: February 3, 2008 Total Events Attended: 332 | I say we remove it Ying was just defending himself. He was attacked, and he was just defending himself. Sure some people to need to keep their anger. But Simon? We all know hes a kindhearted person. As Mugger said:
Its true. We shouldnt adopt a policy like that. But in this individual case, do you think Simon is a person that would take advantage of a policy like this? Simon is a nice guy, and hes always friendly. I dont think I've seen him be cruel or mean for a very long time. He isnt a person who would just flame because he has a chance to. I really hope some of you reconsider, I really feel that the way the votes are going is unfair -------------------- bto  Ex-WG Warlord  "It is our direction, not our intentions, that lead us to our destinations." | ||
Posted: July 17, 2008 11:08 pm | |||
| IRC Nickname: Group: Guests Posts: Member No.: 0 Joined: January 1, 1970 Total Events Attended: 1 | Nice person sure, that doesn't make him above the rules. -------------------- | ||
Posted: July 19, 2008 06:59 pm | |||
 IRC Nickname: Abs Group: Emeritus Posts: 2071 Member No.: 4 Joined: December 26, 2007 Total Events Attended: 97 | This warning appeal has been declined due to unpopular vote or Council decision.
~The Council --------------------  "I may not agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Wg Council & Secondary Leader - 21/10/07 to 24/12/08 Msn: [email protected] | ||
[Declined]_[Vote Now] Warning Appeal - Yingyang06