. : News : . . : Message of the Week : .
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.

These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only.

For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE.
"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home."
~His Lordship
War Alert: OFF Raid Alert: OFF
PM a WG Official
 Inactivity - I would like your input
Posted: July 20, 2008 12:36 amTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Guests
Posts:
Member No.: 0
Joined: January 1, 1970
Total Events Attended: 1
We are fairly inactive as it stands and are amidst an inactivity check now.
However I would like to know what your opinions are as far as how it should be enforced.

After tomorrow I am going to take the list of those who put their name on the IA, add to it those who have posted inactivity, and then I will be left with a bunch of names who are "Inactive".

This may be 30 or it may be 75, I really don't know yet.

My question is, what do YOU think the next step should be?

Do they just all get kicked?
Do Emeritus' get exempted from this check?
Do we just save the list and do nothing about it?

etc...

Thoughts please.
 
--------------------

Posted: July 20, 2008 12:38 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Mistah_Vince
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 2235
Member No.: 233
Joined: February 14, 2008
Total Events Attended: 85
I don't think you should kick them right away. Make the list, and warn them that if they don't get active within the next month, they will be kicked. Emeritus shouldn't be exempt from this though. Even if they don't play RS anymore, they still have an account in f2p, and they can attend wars.

That's just my opinion.

- Vince.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: July 20, 2008 12:49 amTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Guests
Posts:
Member No.: 0
Joined: January 1, 1970
Total Events Attended: 1
You think they should get another month? Wow.
 
--------------------

Posted: July 20, 2008 12:58 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Mistah_Vince
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 2235
Member No.: 233
Joined: February 14, 2008
Total Events Attended: 85
Well, maybe not a whole month. But at least a chance.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: July 20, 2008 01:21 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls
Group: Banned
Posts: 2956
Member No.: 422
Joined: April 4, 2008
Total Events Attended: 130
After 3 days of the inactivity check: PM them over the site about the activity check etc

After 10 days if still no response, give them Ex-Member status. If they become active again they'd make a new application and start back at the bottom.

MAKE SURE THAT YOU HAVE CHECKED FOR VAILD INACTIVITY TOPICS FIRST.

Emeritus should have one month to respond to the PM. If they dont then obviously they wouldn't be able to meet their requirement of coming to full out wars ever now and then/

Activity is something that should be taken very seriously at this stage.

~Mugger84
 
--------------------
Mugger84
Member Of WG Since 4th April 2008.
WG Raid Leader Since 20th June 2008.
WG Council Since 20th November 2008.
Banned from WG Since 6th March 2009.
DF IG Since 6th March 2009.
DF FA Since 15th March 2009.
Ex-Member Of WG Since 26th March 2009.
Member of DF Since 6th April 2009.
Clan Friend of WG Since 4th June 2009.
---
||Ex-WG Warlord || Current Member of DF || Ex-Rampage Leader ||
user posted image

Posted: July 20, 2008 03:25 amTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Guests
Posts:
Member No.: 0
Joined: January 1, 1970
Total Events Attended: 1
QUOTE (Mugger84 @ July 19, 2008 09:21 pm)
After 3 days of the inactivity check: PM them over the site about the activity check etc

After 10 days if still no response, give them Ex-Member status. If they become active again they'd make a new application and start back at the bottom.

MAKE SURE THAT YOU HAVE CHECKED FOR VAILD INACTIVITY TOPICS FIRST.

Emeritus should have one month to respond to the PM. If they dont then obviously they wouldn't be able to meet their requirement of coming to full out wars ever now and then/

Activity is something that should be taken very seriously at this stage.

~Mugger84

I like your suggestion there Mugger.
Perhaps not 10 days after, more like 3-5, but PMing would be good.

 
--------------------

Posted: July 20, 2008 04:48 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls
Group: Banned
Posts: 2956
Member No.: 422
Joined: April 4, 2008
Total Events Attended: 130
By 10 days i meant from the time of the Activity Sweep post i.e. an extra 7 days.

~Mugger84
 
--------------------
Mugger84
Member Of WG Since 4th April 2008.
WG Raid Leader Since 20th June 2008.
WG Council Since 20th November 2008.
Banned from WG Since 6th March 2009.
DF IG Since 6th March 2009.
DF FA Since 15th March 2009.
Ex-Member Of WG Since 26th March 2009.
Member of DF Since 6th April 2009.
Clan Friend of WG Since 4th June 2009.
---
||Ex-WG Warlord || Current Member of DF || Ex-Rampage Leader ||
user posted image

Posted: July 20, 2008 05:03 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Pazenon
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 1477
Member No.: 33
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 79
Before kicking those who failed to post, you should try to get in contact with them. Also, if they don't respond to the forums PMs (which will obviously be the main method to try to talk to them), don't just kick them. Email them, call them if you have their numbers, etc.

As for Emeritus, use the same method with them, but give them an extended period of contacting you about their inactivity. Most of them don't go online on a regular basis.
 
--------------------

Posted: July 20, 2008 08:44 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname: Starzhine
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 447
Member No.: 218
Joined: February 9, 2008
Total Events Attended: 64
Emeritus should definitely be kept. That is the reason for the rank to exist.

As far as kicking people for being inactive. I say yes, if they do not want to stay.

But those you can not reach or do not respond should be moved to an inactive list. That way we can exclude the "inactive" from our stats. Though I believe anyone who has gone through the trouble of becoming a member and maybe attaining rank should be given every opportunity to come back, if they so choose. But please, keep in mind that activity goes up and down. Real life does have a way of interfering with our fun.

WG wub.gif
 
--------------------
user posted image
WG love forever, Kristy
user posted image

Posted: July 20, 2008 10:29 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: bto
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3815
Member No.: 196
Joined: February 3, 2008
Total Events Attended: 332
Warning, wait couple days (maybe a week to be fair?) then kick

Emeritus excluded
 
--------------------
bto
user posted image
Ex-WG Warlord
user posted image
"It is our direction, not our intentions, that lead us to our destinations."

Posted: July 20, 2008 10:36 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Mickey
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 5305
Member No.: 48
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 282
They should be booted. If they are dumb enough not to post inactivity, they shouldn't have went inactive. If it's for a reason they didn't get the chance to tell us they should just re apply. Make them Ex-Members, besides trials.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: July 20, 2008 11:06 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Tnuac
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 1806
Member No.: 51
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 58
EDIT: This has been sorted, + can be deleted.
 
--------------------
~Aetas: carpe diem quam minimum credula postero~

"Seize the day and place no trust in tomorrow"


user posted image

Posted: July 20, 2008 11:39 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Guests
Posts:
Member No.: 0
Joined: January 1, 1970
Total Events Attended: 1
I've been council for 2 weeks and read every suggestion that has been posted.
Thanks.
 
--------------------

Posted: July 21, 2008 12:53 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Tnuac
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 1806
Member No.: 51
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 58
QUOTE (Tmal34 @ July 20, 2008 11:39 pm)
I've been council for 2 weeks and read every suggestion that has been posted.
Thanks.

I'm sure you have.

But please, reply more. It makes them appear (to the non-leaders) much more 'finished' and included on the whole.

---

On topic, I'd probably give them all a PM allowing them a few days to respond, then give the kick. The PM shouldn't be a direct challenge, but an inquisitive way to find out why they haven't posted in the activity check. There could be many rl reasons why they suddenly disappeared, and could be back.

Probably depends how many there are as well.



 
--------------------
~Aetas: carpe diem quam minimum credula postero~

"Seize the day and place no trust in tomorrow"


user posted image

Posted: July 21, 2008 11:54 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Abs
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 2071
Member No.: 4
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 97
Pm'ing them or finding their friends to contact them is a good idea.
I'd go along with Mugger's suggestion except, 6-7 Days to reply back.

~Abs
 
--------------------
user posted image
"I may not agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
Wg Council & Secondary Leader - 21/10/07 to 24/12/08
Msn: [email protected]