| . : News : . | . : Message of the Week : . |
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.
These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only. For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE. |
"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home." ~His Lordship |
|---|---|---|
| War Alert: OFF | Raid Alert: OFF | |
PM a WG Official |
||
Posted: February 14, 2008 07:27 pm  | |||||||||||||
    IRC Nickname: Group: Guests Posts: Member No.: 0 Joined: January 1, 1970 Total Events Attended: 1    | Our fighting sector requirements are generous at best. Many members agree that they should be raised, especially with the introduction of summoning. Here are my proposals for our new fighting sector requirements. Current:-
New:-
The gear requirement will be enforced via having new members post a picture of their pk gear. Spot-checks will be carried out while massing for raids. -------------------- | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 14, 2008 07:31 pm | |||||||||||||
  IRC Nickname: Zlat Group: Clan Friend Posts: 2781 Member No.: 9 Joined: December 29, 2007 Total Events Attended: 60 | Agreement to attend fighting events if they are online at the time of the event. Unless a good reason can be provided. ^^^^ Agreeeeed --------------------   | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 14, 2008 07:31 pm | |||||||||||||
 IRC Nickname: Dalejamesw Group: Banned Posts: -1280 Member No.: 14 Joined: December 29, 2007 Total Events Attended: 222 | YES all the way. Maybe trial members can be 100+ but have to get 105 in the 2 weeks they are trial idk but The gear YES. Maybe get some mandatory pking going and some returning  -------------------- | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 14, 2008 07:35 pm | |||||||||||||
 IRC Nickname: Pyroclastic0 Group: Elite Guardian Posts: 1158 Member No.: 35 Joined: December 30, 2007 Total Events Attended: 221 | i think should only have f2p combat and then have extra requirements if you want to include summoning the same as magic or range but i have no idea what 7cmb lvls is in summoning -------------------- Having a fight on the internet is alot like the participating in the special olympics you may win, but you're still retarded
Best pker + most mature summer awards 2011 | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 14, 2008 07:46 pm | |||||||||||||
 IRC Nickname: Mickey Group: Emeritus Posts: 5305 Member No.: 48 Joined: December 30, 2007 Total Events Attended: 282 | We do well at Pking without 107+ combat, why 60+ prayer? You can pot in p2p and for the f2p members, It's hard to get 60+ prayer. --------------------    | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 14, 2008 09:46 pm | |||||||||||||
 IRC Nickname: Pazenon Group: Emeritus Posts: 1477 Member No.: 33 Joined: December 30, 2007 Total Events Attended: 79 | Agreed. Combat requirements don't really matter, but enforcing attendance really does. -------------------- | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 14, 2008 11:32 pm | |||||||||||||
 IRC Nickname: Maths Group: Ex-Member Posts: 1855 Member No.: 54 Joined: December 31, 2007 Total Events Attended: 286 | I would only like to see the gear requirement from this enforced. We barely have members now, I think we need to keep at 100. --------------------  "Journeys are what brings us happiness, Not the destination." ~ Two time ex-raid leader of wg ~  | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 16, 2008 06:26 pm | |||||||||||||
| IRC Nickname: Group: Guests Posts: Member No.: 0 Joined: January 1, 1970 Total Events Attended: 1 | I agree with the new rules except for one. The 60+ Prayer. It is very wise for you to have it, however it is not practical as a requirement. -------------------- | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 17, 2008 02:02 am | |||||||||||||
| IRC Nickname: Group: Guests Posts: Member No.: 0 Joined: January 1, 1970 Total Events Attended: 1 | tbh it should just be f2p combat, until someoen finds a good use for summoning in wild (unless they already have ll) -------------------- | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 17, 2008 04:58 am | |||||||||||||
| IRC Nickname: Group: Elite Guardian Posts: 7306 Member No.: 47 Joined: December 30, 2007 Total Events Attended: 343 | I would always fail the 5 p2p sets.  -------------------- July 5, 2007 - June 27, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 17, 2008 06:09 am | |||||||||||||
 IRC Nickname: karel Group: Emeritus Posts: 1021 Member No.: 57 Joined: December 31, 2007 Total Events Attended: 89 | It's a great set of reqs imo, but now is not the time to change -------------------- Sig? | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 17, 2008 08:20 am | |||||||||||||
 IRC Nickname: Gusmighster Group: Emeritus Posts: 1360 Member No.: 46 Joined: December 30, 2007 Total Events Attended: 67 | If these requirements do become an addition, I will fail a number of things; 105+ f2p combat, that will be easy, no complaints. However, 112 P2P combat, I will just train up my combat instead of summoning, so no complaints there. 60+ prayer I will get willingly, but the 5 sets I will fail until I sort my bank out. Currently my banks worth is hovering over 3m. Without selling my training and skilling stuff I spend everything I have on sets. Until I get 85 mining I will not be able to get 5 sets of p2p and f2p. As you can tell - I voted no. However, after thinking about it, when I voted, I was thinking for myself. Not the clan. These requirements will benefit WG alot more than the current reqs do. I will just have to take a step out from the fighting sector when the requirements are impleneted, get the levels and the bank and then re-join  . --------------------  | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 17, 2008 02:44 pm | |||||||||||||
 IRC Nickname: Me9 Group: Ex-Member Posts: 459 Member No.: 59 Joined: December 31, 2007 Total Events Attended: 51 | If we want to bring up the fighting sector again, our conduct in BH need to improve as well. By that, I mean the attire needs to be clearly stated - for eg. No Brown skulls in both f2p/p2p. You can have 5 sets and stuff in the bank but bring shiate in BH.. Not too good for our image in my opinion - that's why I was never really fond of Mage/Range only F2P trips. My point is - The reqs. look fine if that's the standard we want to achieve in future but other aspects have to go along too. I think the question is whether our current members are ready and able cope with these changes. --------------------   -The End- | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 17, 2008 02:59 pm | |||||||||||||
| IRC Nickname: Group: Guests Posts: Member No.: 0 Joined: January 1, 1970 Total Events Attended: 1 | Wow. So it was like... 10 yes 2 no. Now it's 11 yes 23 no. How the **** did that happen? -------------------- | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 17, 2008 05:06 pm | |||||||||||||
 IRC Nickname: Gorgemaster Group: Elite Guardian Posts: 9840 Member No.: 3 Joined: December 26, 2007 Total Events Attended: 540 | Mm I voted yes, but i have mixed views about this. I agree we need to boost member numbers at the moment, then possibly think about changing the reqs. Although those are good reqs and should suit fine. (As long as we get more mid-week fighting events going) ~George --------------------    | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 17, 2008 05:58 pm | |||||||||||||
 IRC Nickname: ^Ryan Group: Guest Posts: 72 Member No.: 157 Joined: January 25, 2008 Total Events Attended: 0 | I had to vote no... there's no way I could ever get 5 p2p sets, 5 f2p is hard enough for me to get. So, if these are implemented, I may also have to step out of fighting sector for a bit until I make some money ._. But, damn... I'm not even full member yet T_T --------------------   | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 17, 2008 10:11 pm | |||||||||||||
 IRC Nickname: Dnovelta Group: Emeritus Posts: 2750 Member No.: 130 Joined: January 20, 2008 Total Events Attended: 137 | I'd like to see some increases, but I doubt we should even take into account the P2P combat levels. They really don't serve that much of a purpose, except making our levels look higher. We should just go by F2P combat levels as the requirements. So 105+ F2P should be alright, however at this moment I don't think it's a great idea to start restricting people from the clan, seeing as how we're not in the best possible state. The gear is a great idea. Personally, I don't think the 60+ Prayer should be applied to F2P, even though it would be good, it doesn't serve a much of a purpose as it does for P2P, besides tanking. I'm sure we've all got higher than 43 Prayer, and close to or above 60+, so no need to make it a requirement. P2P, I think is good, just to boost our combat abilities. Haven't voted yet, still deciding what to say... --------------------   | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 17, 2008 10:53 pm | |||||||||||||
 IRC Nickname: Ret[Keith] Group: Emeritus Posts: 2049 Member No.: 86 Joined: January 1, 2008 Total Events Attended: 82 | yes but 112 way too high more like 108 -------------------- Best Firemaker in WG no lie   <--- rofl1st joined WG: October 18th, 2005. Ex-WG mod, OPH winner  ^My original idea (U GOIN DOWN TWIZ)^ 189th person to get "100" firemaking Hash Unit, Tun Unit, C-Unit    | ||||||||||||
Posted: February 18, 2008 05:27 am | |||||||||||||
 IRC Nickname: RobbieThe1st Group: Founder Posts: 770 Member No.: 2 Joined: December 26, 2007 Total Events Attended: 49 | Personally, I nulled my vote. I may be technically in the fighting sector, but in reality I am not, so I shouldn't vote for or against rules which really don't apply for me. However, I *will* comment on these requirements:
Why not simplify things and remove the Combat requirements - Just specify hitpoints and attack/str requirements. 60+ Prayer is a bit high. 50+ would be better, especially for F2P - heck, in f2p, 43-45 would be fine.
This assumes that there are two weekly wilderness events in your timezone - I think we could do better - have you have to attend 3 events per event in your timezone per month - so, if there was one event in your timezone(or times you are online), you would have to attend at least 3 times - for two, 6 times in a month. This would take care of the "too few events" problem.
This seems fine on paper, but what are you going to do if the guy lost all 5 sets of rune in one event, the day before?
I strongly dissagree with this - Not all of us have a good enough computer to run it without lagging, and would it really be worth it to sacrifice members, or have them lag and not be able to fight effectively because of it? I think not. IRC on the other hand... Definitely. Any computer that can run Runescape can run IRC without lagging, and while its going to be harder to type out, it, like Teamspeak, can organize people without people in the game knowing whats going on.
This is perfectly fine by me.
So, how am I supposed to have 5 sets of P2p gear? I am f2p!  Sorry, I had to say that.  Anyway, thats a little hard to do - what if someone goes to an event and loses all 5 sets? Will he be banned if he doesn't have them the next day? It also might encourage people having 6 sets - one to actually use, and 5 for show - you can't use those because if you do, you risk being banned. I suggest changing this to just having a set of gear ready at all times - If you lose all your sets at an event, you have 48 hours to get at least one set back, or until the next event, whichever is longer. If you *don't* have one at said event, you have to talk to council or w/e and explain your situation. -RobbieThe1st -------------------- Old Avatar - Paypal donation link  I am left handed, and proud of it! Retired from RuneScape. Old forum posts: 2275(s4+s10+wg.com)+1759(z6 old account)+474(z6 new account) Total: 4508 Join date: 4/16/05 | Get Firefox 3.5 now: http://www.getfirefox.com | RobbieSwich for Firefox | ||||||||||||
New Proposed Fighting Requirements, Poll