. : News : . . : Message of the Week : .
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.

These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only.

For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE.
"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home."
~His Lordship
War Alert: OFF Raid Alert: OFF
PM a WG Official
 [Accepted]_Warning Appeal - Ranma344, Over-due for removal
Posted: August 14, 2008 02:37 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Ranma344
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 759
Member No.: 78
Joined: January 1, 2008
Total Events Attended: 24
Rsname: Ranma344
Please copy & paste the "Warned on" date - [This will tell us which warning level you want us to remove, you can find this at the top of the warning level Warned on June 08, 2008 04:08 am
Who were you warned by?:Abmanju
Please write your defence to this warning level - (This must contain some type of evidence and must be quite lengthy, providing the misunderstanding and evidence to prove it I believe that this warn is long overdue for removal, as I have had it for over 2 months now. I feel sorry for flaming the poor kid, although he was being quit annoying. He just made the mistake of pushing me over the edge. I do not know if anyone else got warned but I do know that I was not alone in flaming the kid, and many others joined me. I have been attempting to cut down on the flaming, but I can't control myself if someone gets on my nerves to such an extent. Since the warn was a 40% warn I am also asking that since I waited 2 months, that both warn levels be removed. I feel that this is a reasonable request as I have done my time.
 
--------------------
user posted image
R.I.P. Lucy
!

Posted: August 15, 2008 03:48 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Gorgemaster
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 9840
Member No.: 3
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 540
I agree that 20% warn should be removed.
Had Crucio had stayed then the matter would be different, however he was banned and I think 20% warn should be removed.

I still say that he remains with a total of 40% warn (currently 60%) because he recently flammed Immolatus2 and clearly has not stopped flaming, so stick with 40% i think.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted imageuser posted image

Posted: August 20, 2008 12:11 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Abs
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 2071
Member No.: 4
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 97
This warning appeal has been successfully accepted due to popular vote or Council decision.

~The Council
 
--------------------
user posted image
"I may not agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
Wg Council & Secondary Leader - 21/10/07 to 24/12/08
Msn: [email protected]