. : News : . . : Message of the Week : .
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.

These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only.

For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE.
"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home."
~His Lordship
War Alert: OFF Raid Alert: OFF
PM a WG Official

Pages: (2) [1] 2

 Debating PG-13 for Signatures?
Posted: September 21, 2008 10:18 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Wayne|Eregion2
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3087
Member No.: 156
Joined: January 25, 2008
Total Events Attended: 8
Are these actually allowed? If this keeps up I won't be able to read the forums with my folks around. rolleyes.gif

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: September 21, 2008 10:20 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Sativas
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 2255
Member No.: 1305
Joined: August 29, 2008
Total Events Attended: 155
oh sorry!
I could take mine off, I did it more as a joke anyway smile.gif.
Also if to many people do it theirs a option to turn off signatures.
 
--------------------
user posted image

The Ultimate Skilling and Combat Badges Updated June 17th, 2011

user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image
user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image
user posted image

Posted: September 21, 2008 10:23 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Wayne|Eregion2
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3087
Member No.: 156
Joined: January 25, 2008
Total Events Attended: 8
Yeah, but I don't want to miss out on EVERYONE'S signature just because yours contains an epic mount. hash.png I really like seeing what people come up with around here since there's so much talent.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: September 21, 2008 10:32 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Yingy
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 2205
Member No.: 27
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 21
Signatures are allowed unless they are Racist/Offensive and/or show nude picture's within them.

Half naked women are ok im afraid.

Here is the link to Robbies topic: http://www.wildernessguardians.com/forum/i...p?showtopic=873

PG-13+ Would be topless or bottomless+

Sorry Wayne.

QUOTE
PG-13 rated maximum. You shouldn't have anything in your signature beyond this rating anyway.

Posted: September 21, 2008 10:32 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Banned
Posts: 2447
Member No.: 114
Joined: January 8, 2008
Total Events Attended: 149
Wayne, we are thinking alike... I usually click on View New Posts, and you must have made this topic when I was doing that. Cause I just posted something on this myself. tighthug.gif
 
--------------------

Posted: September 21, 2008 10:47 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Mistah_Vince
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 2235
Member No.: 233
Joined: February 14, 2008
Total Events Attended: 85
I personally see no problem with them, because I make many of them myself...but just to be fair, I want to see them go. I had a nice sig and Tabs made me remove it a while back. :9
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: September 21, 2008 10:57 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Havochaha
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 2257
Member No.: 106
Joined: January 5, 2008
Total Events Attended: 113
i like them though sad.gif
 
--------------------
Havochaha Perm Banned Oct 1st 2009
Havochaha Unbanned February 13th 2011
user posted image
http://www.erepublik.com/en/referrer/Omar+Dandan
How to Make 10m an Hour

Posted: September 21, 2008 11:41 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Rage|Mike
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 1948
Member No.: 1238
Joined: July 29, 2008
Total Events Attended: 132
I have to agree with you wayne, lots of people come near me while I'm on the PC, it makes me scroll down to avoid such signatures all the time :S
 
--------------------
user posted image

MSN: [email protected]
IRC: Rage|Mike at SwiftIRC and SeersIRC
Drop me a comment, click to view my RSC profile!


Proud to be ex-Wilderness Guardian.
user posted image

Posted: September 21, 2008 11:54 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: [JC]
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3320
Member No.: 23
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 147
QUOTE (Yingyang06 @ September 22, 2008 10:32 am)
Signatures are allowed unless they are Racist/Offensive and/or show nude picture's within them.

Half naked women are ok im afraid.

PG-13+ Would be topless or bottomless+

QUOTE
PG-13 rated maximum. You shouldn't have anything in your signature beyond this rating anyway.

I'm sorry Simon but I disagree with you here where you say 'half naked women are okay', an image being offensive is a personal thing and though some people may feel that half nudity is fine others may not.

Yes I am sure that a 13 year old could easily go to a beach to see people dressed the same as those shown in Lego's and Dale's sigs, but in those cases it is their parent's responsobility to censor/educate them.

It is our (The leadership's) responsoibility to act as the hypothetical parents on these forums, and I know for sure that some people would find semi nudity offensive, its sure as hell not what I come and play RS to see.

From my point of veiw, if there is any debate over whather it is or isnt offensive, better to just leave it and find a less contraversial signature.

~Evil
 
--------------------
user posted image

Old awards wat
Most Mature & Most Honourable
Most Dedicated|IRC Freak|Best Emeritus
Placeholder lolz

Posted: September 22, 2008 12:17 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Samurai-JM
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3204
Member No.: 117
Joined: January 11, 2008
Total Events Attended: 8
QUOTE (Theevildead2 @ September 21, 2008 06:54 pm)
QUOTE (Yingyang06 @ September 22, 2008 10:32 am)
Signatures are allowed unless they are Racist/Offensive and/or show nude picture's within them.

Half naked women are ok im afraid.

PG-13+ Would be topless or bottomless+

QUOTE
PG-13 rated maximum. You shouldn't have anything in your signature beyond this rating anyway.

I'm sorry Simon but I disagree with you here where you say 'half naked women are okay', an image being offensive is a personal thing and though some people may feel that half nudity is fine others may not.

Yes I am sure that a 13 year old could easily go to a beach to see people dressed the same as those shown in Lego's and Dale's sigs, but in those cases it is their parent's responsobility to censor/educate them.

It is our (The leadership's) responsoibility to act as the hypothetical parents on these forums, and I know for sure that some people would find semi nudity offensive, its sure as hell not what I come and play RS to see.

From my point of veiw, if there is any debate over whather it is or isnt offensive, better to just leave it and find a less contraversial signature.

~Evil

I for one would most certainly return to playing RS if they introduced hordes of half naked women to the game.
 
--------------------
-=}¤- Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici -¤{=-
user posted image

W I N N I N G

Posted: September 22, 2008 12:26 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Sativas
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 2255
Member No.: 1305
Joined: August 29, 2008
Total Events Attended: 155
QUOTE (Samurai-JM @ September 21, 2008 05:17 pm)
QUOTE (Theevildead2 @ September 21, 2008 06:54 pm)
QUOTE (Yingyang06 @ September 22, 2008 10:32 am)
Signatures are allowed unless they are Racist/Offensive and/or show nude picture's within them.

Half naked women are ok im afraid.

PG-13+ Would be topless or bottomless+

QUOTE
PG-13 rated maximum. You shouldn't have anything in your signature beyond this rating anyway.

I'm sorry Simon but I disagree with you here where you say 'half naked women are okay', an image being offensive is a personal thing and though some people may feel that half nudity is fine others may not.

Yes I am sure that a 13 year old could easily go to a beach to see people dressed the same as those shown in Lego's and Dale's sigs, but in those cases it is their parent's responsobility to censor/educate them.

It is our (The leadership's) responsoibility to act as the hypothetical parents on these forums, and I know for sure that some people would find semi nudity offensive, its sure as hell not what I come and play RS to see.

From my point of veiw, if there is any debate over whather it is or isnt offensive, better to just leave it and find a less contraversial signature.

~Evil

I for one would most certainly return to playing RS if they introduced hordes of half naked women to the game.

rofl tongue.gif
 
--------------------
user posted image

The Ultimate Skilling and Combat Badges Updated June 17th, 2011

user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image
user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image
user posted image

Posted: September 22, 2008 01:02 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Hyperion
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 1636
Member No.: 978
Joined: June 23, 2008
Total Events Attended: 141
My Controls > Board Settings > Do you wish to view members signatures when reading topics? > Select "No"
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image
Dragon boots:29 Whips:2

Posted: September 22, 2008 01:21 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Mike|Sonix
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 1483
Member No.: 13
Joined: December 29, 2007
Total Events Attended: 103
Censorship. Don't we all love it.

Not that these new rules apply to me in any way whatsoever, but I think that you are all being too uptight about everything, its becoming ridiculous. Wayne's first post, in my opinion, is the only valid argument against these signatures at the moment. You don't want your 7 year old brother/sister/cousin walking into your room and asking "Whats that?"

On the other hand, if we have people age 13 (or less) they probably see this stuff constantly online. So why should our boards be any different? The PG13 rule was thought to be fair, because most of us are (or close to) the age of 13. Why should this rule change if we all meet the "age requirement" so to speak, to view such material.

Overall I think its absolutely awful that you are trying to censor anything, when there is nothing to really be censored in the first place. Seriously, when did we become so damn strict on the rules? Its becoming ridiculous lately.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: September 22, 2008 02:15 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Yingy
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 2205
Member No.: 27
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 21
QUOTE (Sonixpber @ September 22, 2008 01:21 am)
Seriously, when did we become so damn strict on the rules? Its becoming ridiculous lately.

Since older players with/out kids, those without a sense of humour and/or those at a certain age began to join. Yes the rules need to be tightened down upon but the signatures are the least of some peoples worries.
 
--------------------
Friend's Forver
The Long Road Ahead - 91/99 Prayer
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: September 22, 2008 02:20 amTop
   


IRC Nickname: [Randy]
Group: Raid Leader
Posts: 5065
Member No.: 16
Joined: December 29, 2007
Total Events Attended: 499
What's the need?
I don't get it... like why is it necessary to have them in your sig.
We all understand she may be hot but how does that represent you?
 
--------------------

user posted imageuser posted image

Posted: September 22, 2008 02:28 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Wayne|Eregion2
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3087
Member No.: 156
Joined: January 25, 2008
Total Events Attended: 8
QUOTE (Sonixpber)
Overall I think its absolutely awful that you are trying to censor anything, when there is nothing to really be censored in the first place. Seriously, when did we become so damn strict on the rules? Its becoming ridiculous lately.
Usually I'd agree with you, I've found several favorite authors by looking up titles of banned books (Robert Cormier and Kevin Henkes, for example). I read Fahrenheit 451 after I heard it was a book about censorship and that it had actually been illicitly censored by the publisher without the author's consent, and found out it was an incredible book.

BARELY-CLOTHED GIRLS IN FORUM SIGNATURES DO NOT DESERVE THAT MUCH RESPECT!
Besides, you're actually censoring my request for censorship. happy.gif
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: September 22, 2008 06:08 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Geofff
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 1238
Member No.: 608
Joined: May 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 96
The last one is hawt hash.png But I think it is fine cause it's not showing any nudity. Just close to it.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: September 22, 2008 06:32 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Ahrims
Group: Guest
Posts: 229
Member No.: 273
Joined: February 26, 2008
Total Events Attended: 29
QUOTE (Geoff_Bland @ September 22, 2008 03:08 pm)
The last one is hawt hash.png But I think it is fine cause it's not showing any nudity. Just close to it.

+1 but like legos the best lul hash.png
 
--------------------
h00kd 0n ph0nix!
user posted image

Posted: September 22, 2008 08:19 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Maths
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 1855
Member No.: 54
Joined: December 31, 2007
Total Events Attended: 286
Rob I have a problem with your avatar because I am a vegetarian and I don't like to see interracial animal sex with sharks + dewgong.

Seriously, I could say stuff like that.
You can only take this so far.
They're not naked.
 
--------------------
user posted image

"Journeys are what brings us happiness,
Not the destination."

~ Two time ex-raid leader of wg ~

user posted image

Posted: September 22, 2008 03:41 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Sativas
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 2255
Member No.: 1305
Joined: August 29, 2008
Total Events Attended: 155
QUOTE (Mathsnerd18 @ September 22, 2008 01:19 am)
Rob I have a problem with your avatar because I am a vegetarian and I don't like to see interracial animal sex with sharks + dewgong.

Seriously, I could say stuff like that.
You can only take this so far.
They're not naked.

I thought you were serious for a second rofl,

I was like "NOT MY AVVY TOO!"
 
--------------------
user posted image

The Ultimate Skilling and Combat Badges Updated June 17th, 2011

user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image
user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image
user posted image

Posted: September 22, 2008 05:42 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Zlat
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 2781
Member No.: 9
Joined: December 29, 2007
Total Events Attended: 60
lol, /drama
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: September 23, 2008 04:53 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Samurai-JM
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3204
Member No.: 117
Joined: January 11, 2008
Total Events Attended: 8
If children learned about where babies REALLY come from and what REALLY happens on Christmas in their early years, none of this would be a problem for anybody.
 
--------------------
-=}¤- Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici -¤{=-
user posted image

W I N N I N G

Posted: September 23, 2008 08:28 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Danltn
Group: Guest
Posts: 268
Member No.: 734
Joined: May 31, 2008
Total Events Attended: 29
QUOTE (Samurai-JM @ September 23, 2008 11:53 am)
If children learned about where babies REALLY come from and what REALLY happens on Christmas in their early years, none of this would be a problem for anybody.

Agreed, I'm not signing up to the "OMG, HUMAN FLESH!!" approach.

Nothing wrong with a nude body. smile.gif
 
--------------------
I'm just Dan.
user posted image

Posted: September 23, 2008 08:38 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Yingy
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 2205
Member No.: 27
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 21
QUOTE (Danltn @ September 23, 2008 08:28 pm)
QUOTE (Samurai-JM @ September 23, 2008 11:53 am)
If children learned about where babies REALLY come from and what REALLY happens on Christmas in their early years, none of this would be a problem for anybody.

Agreed, I'm not signing up to the "OMG, HUMAN FLESH!!" approach.

Nothing wrong with a nude body. smile.gif

Exactly, Everyone has seen themselve's nude... so what's the big deal?
 
--------------------
Friend's Forver
The Long Road Ahead - 91/99 Prayer
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: September 24, 2008 03:53 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: RobbieThe1st
Group: Founder
Posts: 770
Member No.: 2
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 49
Well, erm, my opinion on this is mixed. For one, the arguments that "we have all seen our own bodies, its ok" and "we are all old enough" *are* valid, and heck, I would bet that most of WG is masturbating to porn by 15 anyways, so I can't really say its not OK when coming from that angle.

However, the other side is, do we really want that as the image portrayed when a guest reads the forums? Or if a parent/other non-wg member sees a WG member browsing the forums? It really is immature.

I would like to say no, keep these out of our signatures, keep em in topics in the Gallery(However, we aught to add a [NSFW] designation to such topics), however I will agree that its not a clear cut issue.

What it all boils down to, in my opinion, is what type of image we want to present to the outside world. Do we want to seem like a bunch of young teens whos hormones are completely overrunning any logical thought processes, or a bunch of older, more mature people who deserve respect

I would think the latter, but its up to you all to decide.


-RobbieThe1st
 
--------------------
Old Avatar - Paypal donation link
user posted image
I am left handed, and proud of it! Retired from RuneScape.
Old forum posts: 2275(s4+s10+wg.com)+1759(z6 old account)+474(z6 new account) Total: 4508
Join date: 4/16/05 | Get Firefox 3.5 now: http://www.getfirefox.com | RobbieSwich for Firefox

Pages: (2) [1] 2