. : News : . . : Message of the Week : .
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.

These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only.

For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE.
"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home."
~His Lordship
War Alert: OFF Raid Alert: OFF
PM a WG Official
 A question of bias., Elias + Council + all
Posted: January 4, 2009 03:10 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Valdremia
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 289
Member No.: 64
Joined: December 31, 2007
Total Events Attended: 9
First of all, congratulations of the much elated win to take #10 RAW rank crown. As a token of memoir, I have taken a screenshot of the attendees in the cc, although I am sure there's even more to the list.

user posted image
EDIT: LATEST FULL LIST UPDATED - unable to update at war topic due to locked at http://www.wildernessguardians.com/forum/i...?showtopic=8572 TY.



I will save you the time in reading too much about what this is all about, which I have chosen to announce this after the RAW war for obvious reasons. I found something which I would like you to rest your eyes on an ex-member's view.


THE PICTURE

And so, voila, may I present...

user posted image


Which clearly sits in the IA section...

user posted image


THE DEBATE

http://www.wildernessguardians.com/forum/i...?showtopic=8420
http://www.wildernessguardians.com/forum/i...?showtopic=8433
http://www.wildernessguardians.com/forum/i...?showtopic=8696

QUOTE (Abmanju @ December 24, 2008 08:23 pm)
Well, quite a few people have been complaining about the new changes. So help the Council by answering the following question put forward by Elias:

What should we do to the emeritus rank in order to achieve the following:

1. Reward the longstanding members who decide to retire
2. Maintain our activity standards
3. Ensure that the active members have the incentive to remain on the main ML and not retire - meaning they need to be given extra rewards for committing to the higher activity standards.

If someone comes up with a better suggestion than the current system, we *might* do it.

~Abs


QUOTE (His Lordship @ December 24, 2008 10:12 pm)

That's pretty much no different from Elite.
If I were an Elite I'd go Emeritus simply because I could still get all the goodies, and not worry about as much commitment.


QUOTE (His Lordship @ December 25, 2008 10:56 am)

There are HEAPS of Emeritus members that expect to be given the same amount of privileges as the active ranks and that's fucking wrong.

I am VERY strongly against the idea of letting them freeload off other peoples efforts. If they want to go inactive, they at least have to give SOMETHING back.



QUOTE (His Lordship @ December 27, 2008 06:00 pm)

Taking away access allows a more fair reward to those members who are still committed to the events of WG.


QUOTE (Samurai-JM @ January 02, 2009 12:31 am)
Oh look, I got demoted. Signed up as 'No' for the war, had a legit excuse(weekly family event) and still lost my "honoured" status as an emeritus. Just goes to show how much 3+ years of friendship can go right? Cya.


QUOTE (His Lordship @ January 02, 2009 03:15 am)
To add additionally.
I can understand your anger.
I too would not be happy with losing privileges that I was once given, for no apparent reason.

It is my job to make decisions that WG needs, not what it wants. I just said to someone in PM...

QUOTE
I can see 40 disappointed Emeritus members, but their anger pales in light of the consequences of inaction.



With no offence and taking a true quote...

QUOTE (Abmanju @ January 02, 2009 06:46 am)
QUOTE (Kingrandy0 @ January 01, 2009 09:35 pm)
QUOTE
< work all weekend, getting off sunday in time for the Steeler game, and I spend that time with my family.

also for future wars: no gear, no gp, no time, no will to play runescape, no time to play runescape, do not want runescape, wtf is runescape?

Ah, that last paragraph explains the reason to your "demotion" Sam =(.
It is very saddening =\, but Council can't be biased...you already know that.

=\

~Abs


THE MORALE OF THE STORY?
So, BEFORE you think about demoting or splitting up active to inactive retirees, I would suggest you re-adjust yourselves to think

- that the retired Emeritus are required to earn their access while you allow some freeload access of even ex-members.
- People who stayed and those who even took out time in their RL to attend wars (NOT events mind you) are being segregated and judged based on their activity for being inactive.
- Demotion for people who actually aren't actually freeloading.
- Retirees who actually had to debate and ask their way through this.

And I understand there had been several ex-members given this SPECIAL privilege for having been out and "freeloading" you call it?


TRUST
This is no longer a new issue. But since you've decided to practice bias triple standards. Its sad to even watch all these bickering while this is the truth. And so this is it.

Sure, we could say this whole thing is rectified, IA is opened and #WG is available. It all happened before this and retirees STILL needs to EARN their stay here.

* Why not provide free access to all ex-members?

*Why not do-away with Emeritus? You don't need that complications by the looks of this.

* What is the point to continue taking time out from RL to contribute, to earn something as if its owed?


And yet you question many others who had given alot of their efforts, should I name a few? Snowzak, Palidore, Tnuac etc...many more, ex-staffs too and members.

These debates encourages rifts among members to retirees with all those implementations and yet the audacity of lack in respect to even dare condemn those who are still here to contribute.


AUDACITY
While this CR WAR is won, you better believe it that it is owed to the people who retired and came out to just fight this, to earn their commitment while some are indeed allowed freeloads by the very person who advocated against it.

Maybe some have more patience for this, because the moral of it isn't important to them.

But I wonder whatever gives you the right to question emeritus who do not play RS nor can attend wars while you give freeloads to those who doesn't play anyway nor attend wars outside the community. A question of trust.

What is the point even to attend your precious (only)wars when others need not do a thing nor play a thing or be active within to keep their access?

GF.

 
--------------------
"I will listen to you, especially when we disagree." - Barack Obama

user posted image

Posted: January 4, 2009 03:17 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: leecable
Group: Banned
Posts: 1938
Member No.: 410
Joined: April 1, 2008
Total Events Attended: 178
Just because Kenshln is trying to look at the topic, doesnt mean he can read it. I can link someone something in the adult forum, and if they dont appear, they still appear in the viewing box.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image user posted image

Posted: January 4, 2009 03:19 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Rage|Mike
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 1948
Member No.: 1238
Joined: July 29, 2008
Total Events Attended: 132
I'm not sure about this but in multiple forums, being linked to a board that you can't access makes you appear on that board's active viewing user list.

Might be the case, but I in no way am saying that I'm sure here, better ask Robbie
 
--------------------
user posted image

MSN: [email protected]
IRC: Rage|Mike at SwiftIRC and SeersIRC
Drop me a comment, click to view my RSC profile!


Proud to be ex-Wilderness Guardian.
user posted image

Posted: January 4, 2009 03:23 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Valdremia
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 289
Member No.: 64
Joined: December 31, 2007
Total Events Attended: 9
QUOTE (Leecable @ January 04, 2009 11:17 pm)
Just because Kenshln is trying to look at the topic, doesnt mean he can read it. I can link someone something in the adult forum, and if they dont appear, they still appear in the viewing box.

Sure, show me a link that goes there without direct access from the to-be reader. And why give link when its a sensitive topic when clearly the person knows he/she cannot read and yet give them?

Oh, I do have other testimonials to this, but as I promised, I will not reveal the person's id and conversation. No matter what, you can choose not to believe it, whether or not, the trust is questionable.
 
--------------------
"I will listen to you, especially when we disagree." - Barack Obama

user posted image

Posted: January 4, 2009 03:23 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Jesseh
Group: Guest
Posts: 2670
Member No.: 297
Joined: March 8, 2008
Total Events Attended: 222
Hmmm weird, he shouldn't be able to view it.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
17/6/08--> 12/9/08--> 29/11/08--> 5/1/09--> 2/3/09(Left)--> 19/7/09(Rejoin)--> 2/8/09
QUOTE
�21:48:06� * @Abs|Busy sexes Jesseh

Posted: January 5, 2009 12:52 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Gorgemaster
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 9840
Member No.: 3
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 540
QUOTE (Valdremia @ January 04, 2009 03:23 pm)
QUOTE (Leecable @ January 04, 2009 11:17 pm)
Just because Kenshln is trying to look at the topic, doesnt mean he can read it. I can link someone something in the adult forum, and if they dont appear, they still appear in the viewing box.

Sure, show me a link that goes there without direct access from the to-be reader. And why give link when its a sensitive topic when clearly the person knows he/she cannot read and yet give them?

Oh, I do have other testimonials to this, but as I promised, I will not reveal the person's id and conversation. No matter what, you can choose not to believe it, whether or not, the trust is questionable.

Lee speaks the truth.
Accidents happen, sometimes topics links like this are posted in the lobby and stuff.
Like if one member sees another coming into the lobby who has not signed up, member one may say "sign up for the war- link to topic here"

Mistakes happen
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted imageuser posted image

Posted: January 5, 2009 01:03 amTop
   


IRC Nickname: [Randy]
Group: Raid Leader
Posts: 5065
Member No.: 16
Joined: December 29, 2007
Total Events Attended: 499
Yeah, when a guest clicks on a link on our forums, it says they're reading that topic but they really are on the menu that says "You can't read this blah blah blah"

It just so happens that Ken clicked on the site banner at the time.
Occasionally you see guests reading the TS details because they click on the link in the header.
 
--------------------

user posted imageuser posted image

Posted: January 5, 2009 01:10 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Ret[Keith]
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 2049
Member No.: 86
Joined: January 1, 2008
Total Events Attended: 82
Kenshln is a hax mastermind
 
--------------------
Best Firemaker in WG no lie
user posted image
user posted image<--- rofl
1st joined WG: October 18th, 2005.
Ex-WG mod, OPH winner
user posted image
^My original idea (U GOIN DOWN TWIZ)^
189th person to get "100" firemaking
Hash Unit, Tun Unit, C-Unit
user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image

Posted: January 5, 2009 02:19 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Abs
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 2071
Member No.: 4
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 97
I click the "Member Name" thing all the time, and sometimes I see a Tertiary Leader viewing a topic, I click on it, and bam "Sorry you have no permission to view this topic"

The "Sorry you have no permission to view this topic" screen IS what Kenshln is looking at in that screenshot.

Valdremia, we're not hiding this from you, I am 150% sure Council will NEVER EVER give out biased access to certain Ex-Members, it NEVER happened while you were Council, and it will NEVER happen, just because Wg has changed doesn't mean our expectations has changed =P

It was just a mistake on your part, you weren't fully aware of the topic viewing thing.

Anyway, 150% sure Council is still unbiased, when I left, Ex-Members aren't able to be view IA, and I'm pretty sure they still can't.

~Abs

P.S. - I think this topic should be moved to Trash Can on approval from Topic owner, since it was indeed made from not enough information, therefore it is wrong information making unnecessary drama.
 
--------------------
user posted image
"I may not agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
Wg Council & Secondary Leader - 21/10/07 to 24/12/08
Msn: [email protected]

Posted: January 5, 2009 03:16 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Colin
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 2039
Member No.: 68
Joined: December 31, 2007
Total Events Attended: 69
You missed me in the attendance part. sad.gif
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
Proud WG member from January 2006 - Fall 2009

Posted: January 5, 2009 03:45 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Karlfischer
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 664
Member No.: 124
Joined: January 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 55
QUOTE (Gorgemaster @ January 05, 2009 12:52 am)
QUOTE (Valdremia @ January 04, 2009 03:23 pm)
QUOTE (Leecable @ January 04, 2009 11:17 pm)
Just because Kenshln is trying to look at the topic, doesnt mean he can read it. I can link someone something in the adult forum, and if they dont appear, they still appear in the viewing box.

Sure, show me a link that goes there without direct access from the to-be reader. And why give link when its a sensitive topic when clearly the person knows he/she cannot read and yet give them?

Oh, I do have other testimonials to this, but as I promised, I will not reveal the person's id and conversation. No matter what, you can choose not to believe it, whether or not, the trust is questionable.

Lee speaks the truth.
Accidents happen, sometimes topics links like this are posted in the lobby and stuff.
Like if one member sees another coming into the lobby who has not signed up, member one may say "sign up for the war- link to topic here"

Mistakes happen

Sure, he could have accidentally clicked on the link, or clicked on it purposely. However, what I find strange is that he would sit at a page he cannot view for over 10 minutes (look at the times, he clicked it at 1:21, the most recent time is 1:32) without either closing the window or navigating to another part of WG forums.

EDIT: It occurs to me now though that closing the window might not actually log the person out of the forum, in which case he could have closed the window without bothering to log out and it would still display his name on the forum.

I know this picture does not prove he can view anything he is not supposed to, but it would be nice for a Council to atleast check the masks of what forums he can view.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: January 5, 2009 05:52 amTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Banned
Posts: 2447
Member No.: 114
Joined: January 8, 2008
Total Events Attended: 149
QUOTE (Karlfischer @ January 04, 2009 07:45 pm)
Sure, he could have accidentally clicked on the link, or clicked on it purposely. However, what I find strange is that he would sit at a page he cannot view for over 10 minutes (look at the times, he clicked it at 1:21, the most recent time is 1:32) without either closing the window or navigating to another part of WG forums.

EDIT: It occurs to me now though that closing the window might not actually log the person out of the forum, in which case he could have closed the window without bothering to log out and it would still display his name on the forum.

I know this picture does not prove he can view anything he is not supposed to, but it would be nice for a Council to atleast check the masks of what forums he can view.

When I go to check new posts on forums, I literally open up 5-15 tabs to view different topics. Sometimes, I don't get to the last tab I opened for 15-30 min, depending on how much posting I'm doing on other topics. So in theory, I could be viewing a topic for that long, when in practice, I haven't even read it. confused.gif
 
--------------------

Posted: January 5, 2009 06:58 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
I viewed the entire Admin logs of Myself, Arsenalfan32, Mugger84, Anatcrafter, Kingrandy0 and even Abmanu and Robbiethe1st.

I give you my word, none of them touch Kenshln's account. I will take screenshots if you don't believe me.

In all likelihood, the link to the war topic was given in the lobby or on the forums somewhere and Kenshln clicked it.

He was unable to view the topic, but the online logs showed that he was on it. In the same way... conduct this test yourself... Get a trial to click a level 1 topic. It will show them as viewing it, even though they can't. It's just the way the forums work.

I guarentee you, this is a misunderstanding Daren.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: January 5, 2009 07:06 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Geofff
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 1238
Member No.: 608
Joined: May 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 96
QUOTE (Colinwarrior @ January 04, 2009 10:16 pm)
You missed me in the attendance part. sad.gif

+1. Although I had to go after the third kill.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: January 5, 2009 04:54 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Valdremia
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 289
Member No.: 64
Joined: December 31, 2007
Total Events Attended: 9
When we stand between the lines of guilty till proven innocent and innocent till proven guilty, place these lines together one after the other and vice versa, there lies in a kind of truth that disables each other out because of conditions that we choose to forgo a truth as oppose to a fact.

The reason we choose to protect certain things lies very much on truths that are witnessed and not told, things we hold dearly because its worth it. And what’s worth it lies in the reasons again that springs from where one’s integrity and idea of it is built on.

The toughest to the easiest is when we are unable to exercise it to when we can but chose not to.

Thank you for the explanation Elias.

If I were to ask myself honestly, I could not ignore the testimonial and list of names given to me deemed "illegitimate access" that cannot be shared without discrediting the goodwill of a promise, yet at the same time I will take into account all the rationale here plus the stake of trust given based on what’s said and explained. It isn’t fair to all those not involved, members or council, leaders alike. If for whence a misunderstanding would definitely do us all good.

This is, unfortunately, the best honest answer I could give, without intent, to further question all current council's integrity. All in all, I'm sure its better exercising thereon non-bias treatment and fairness to those who deserve it, would be a priority of yours, at best interests for all, as guaranteed.



P.S. Well, still adore you Abs, thank you for your POV I do enjoy reading it, likewise for everyone, thank you. And pardon the pre-mature attendance list, I've missed out 1 more screenie too late.
 
--------------------
"I will listen to you, especially when we disagree." - Barack Obama

user posted image

Posted: January 5, 2009 11:15 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Jenny
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 1967
Member No.: 19
Joined: December 29, 2007
Total Events Attended: 56
Where the hell is my name?
 
--------------------
user posted image


user posted image

Posted: January 6, 2009 03:29 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: [JC]
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3320
Member No.: 23
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 147
I don't have time to post a long reply to this post at the moemnt, but I do think that Valdy has discovered some security risk here.

It seems unusual to me that Kenshln (who obviously is one of those members that has alot of friends both within WG and within the leadership) that no longer has his main RS account (its banned for those that don't know) would come accross a link to a topic in our IRC (or elsewhere).

Have you seen Ken in our IRC recently? because unless he suddenly decided to become active there, I havent seen him there in months.

I also find it incredible that someone like Ken (who has many friends in WG) just happens to be the one that has shown up with potential IA access. He would be just the kind of person that some bias would be applied to IMO, I just hope that this isn't the case, though I would be surprised if Valdy was posting this thread without rock solid evidence.

~Evil
 
--------------------
user posted image

Old awards wat
Most Mature & Most Honourable
Most Dedicated|IRC Freak|Best Emeritus
Placeholder lolz

Posted: January 6, 2009 03:50 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Robertw56
Group: Guest
Posts: 1908
Member No.: 15
Joined: December 29, 2007
Total Events Attended: 118
You know he could of just clicked one of the war sigs.....
 
--------------------
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

Posted: January 6, 2009 05:28 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: RobbieThe1st
Group: Founder
Posts: 770
Member No.: 2
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 49
QUOTE (Robertw56 @ January 06, 2009 03:50 am)
You know he could of just clicked one of the war sigs.....

Exactly. Or, at that time, the frigging *banner*.

-RobbieThe1st
 
--------------------
Old Avatar - Paypal donation link
user posted image
I am left handed, and proud of it! Retired from RuneScape.
Old forum posts: 2275(s4+s10+wg.com)+1759(z6 old account)+474(z6 new account) Total: 4508
Join date: 4/16/05 | Get Firefox 3.5 now: http://www.getfirefox.com | RobbieSwich for Firefox

Posted: January 6, 2009 07:52 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Mickey
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 5305
Member No.: 48
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 282
I've linked people in the IRC to high level secruity topics before. The member without the access clicks it and get's a "You do not have permission to view this topic" message, meanwhile, in the few seconds they are TRYING to view the topic, they are marked on the active users as actually viewing it.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: January 6, 2009 10:51 pmTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Kiwi011
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3052
Member No.: 40
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 21
QUOTE (Geoff_Bland @ January 05, 2009 07:06 am)
QUOTE (Colinwarrior @ January 04, 2009 10:16 pm)
You missed me in the attendance part.  sad.gif

+1. Although I had to go after the third kill.

I also am not in it =/
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: January 6, 2009 11:02 pmTop
   


IRC Nickname: Mojohaza1
Group: Council
Posts: 495
Member No.: 1574
Joined: December 22, 2008
Total Events Attended: 33
i don't know whats happening here so i won't comment, although i do see my name on the forum screeny!
 
--------------------

Posted: January 9, 2009 02:24 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: megajayson
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 9246
Member No.: 423
Joined: April 4, 2008
Total Events Attended: 216
ya um *confused*

he just clicked on a link

no biggy
 
--------------------
user posted image

This is ten percent luck, twenty percent skill
Fifteen percent concentrated power of will
Five percent pleasure, fifty percent pain
And a hundred percent reason to remember the name!



7th Highest Overall for Wars Attended.