. : News : . . : Message of the Week : .
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.

These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only.

For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE.
"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home."
~His Lordship
War Alert: OFF Raid Alert: OFF
PM a WG Official

Pages: (3) [1] 2 3

 A Sensitive Discussion
Posted: January 11, 2009 01:15 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
Because this discussion is so sensitive, there will be rules in place

1. No threats, eg. "I will leave if _______"
2. No scenarios, eg. "I wouldn't join WG if I thought _________"
3. No naming specific names except non-WG and His Lordship
4. ZERO flaming tolerance, with immediate suspensions given out.
5. Nothing that could lower morale.

__________

We had a RoT castle wars crash once and lost 20 members to it.
As to avoid it, I want to conduct this maturely.
I have just been flamed by about 5-6 different clans... here's the story.

QUOTE
As most of you know, VR hacked TT several times and TT threatened to hunt VR until death. In support of TT, I pledged WG to TT's cause, as hacking is the lowest NH.

TT massed to crash a VR fight today against DF, and I massed WG to join them. DF threatened to crash us into closure should we go through with it. I submitted to DF's threat following the advice of (unnamed member). Dalejamesw has consequently been demoted as a result of his rudeness toward WG and the despicable way he talked down to us.


The discussion is about the ethics of WG. Under most circumstances we frown upon crashing. Does a hacking clan deserve a clean fight? We have to choose between two morals. Crashing or hacking. Inaction against either validates it as acceptable.

Now onto an equally important topic. DF and perhaps one or two other clans now have the intention of planting spies in WG. This means applications have to get bloody intense. Can a leader please disable the top-clan option to join WG, thanks. Also referrals will now have to be pre-intro referrals. You have to have known them before they intro'd, and each application need TWO referrals. Be VERY careful with recruitment.

Leaders, do not accept any applications without my green light from now on.

___________

Be delicate in your replies. I am currently supremely agitated, and holding my composure with difficulty. I have been flamed by about 10 clans, threatened with crashed from DF, had to fight my old friend Dhboy on MSN, argue with (unnamed member) over DF, as well as cop the usual anti-Lordship remarks. If there is flaming on this topic, I could very well overreact, and lose WG's trust. The last thing I want is for this to turn into a RoT Fidelity Crash situation, with 15-20 members leaving.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:18 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
Before you say it, yes I am going to spend some time cooling off.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:18 amTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Elite Guardian
Posts: 7306
Member No.: 47
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 343
Personally, I say we assist TT in hunting VR. Not crashing planned fights but if they step foot in the wilderness we're out there with TT making them wish they hadn't.
 
--------------------
July 5, 2007 - June 27, 2011

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:19 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: [Narita]
Group: Guest
Posts: 695
Member No.: 1378
Joined: October 15, 2008
Total Events Attended: 34
why stoop to a nh level? wg has moral stick to them, if other clan want to crash leave them. and on the recruitment side, its a good idea to be cautious but we dont want to be too cautious or it will put members off joining
 
--------------------

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:20 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Mickey
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 5305
Member No.: 48
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 282
They tried to crash us anyway, and yeh, Dales behaviour was unacceptable.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:20 amTop
   


IRC Nickname: Tttkaab|Brandon
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 622
Member No.: 123
Joined: January 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 53
Two wrongs don't make a right, and I'm afraid it'd be the worst possible decision for us to start crashing VR wars. VR and clans that fight VR like DF are way out of our league and could hunt WG into extinction. It was a mistake to agree to this, no offense. I suggest stay out of it, we don't need to take sides we can be fence-sitters and that way take no blame. I agree with Joe, hunting them is fine. Crashing them is another story.





Brandon
 
--------------------
Ex-Wilderness Leader of WG.

I'll always be here for the people that need me.

RS Accounts: Sadcon1, Tttkaab & T Dwag

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:21 amTop
   


IRC Nickname: [Kgmb]
Group: Guest
Posts: 223
Member No.: 1568
Joined: December 20, 2008
Total Events Attended: 34
Maybe just hunting them with TT and others but not bothering a planned fight
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:22 amTop
   


IRC Nickname: Hobbo690
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 147
Member No.: 1497
Joined: November 23, 2008
Total Events Attended: 9
honestly heres my opinion.

the df and vr fight should have gone ahead as planned as like df said on the rsc topic no1 else will fight them and also the war was arranged before the hacking went public. However any wars after this 1 the crashing should have started or no1 should war vr. People are now assuming df have taken vrs side however they only wanted a clean fight. After the crashing i think we must be careful as this could lead to df joining vrs side.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:24 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Aardvark
Group: Banned
Posts: 759
Member No.: 322
Joined: March 13, 2008
Total Events Attended: 175
QUOTE (Quikdrawjoe @ January 10, 2009 08:18 pm)
Personally, I say we assist TT in hunting VR. Not crashing planned fights but if they step foot in the wilderness we're out there with TT making them wish they hadn't.

I agree with Joe very strongly, and about the recruitment deal I totally understand but going that extreme is going to hurt people wanting to join WG that are innnocent. deal is we cant back off when being blackmailed, if we make a choice then stick to it, otherwise dont make the choice in the 1st place, and also be sure that the teams we are baclking up will be willing to back us up as well

 
--------------------
user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:25 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Ret[Keith]
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 2049
Member No.: 86
Joined: January 1, 2008
Total Events Attended: 82
I was astonished when I saw that a VR member told you outright to shut up, and then went on to insult our entire clan.

Those spy sending clans deserve to have their most private matters leaked, TBH. Not a flame, just what I believe.
 
--------------------
Best Firemaker in WG no lie
user posted image
user posted image<--- rofl
1st joined WG: October 18th, 2005.
Ex-WG mod, OPH winner
user posted image
^My original idea (U GOIN DOWN TWIZ)^
189th person to get "100" firemaking
Hash Unit, Tun Unit, C-Unit
user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:28 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: leecable
Group: Banned
Posts: 1938
Member No.: 410
Joined: April 1, 2008
Total Events Attended: 178
Pssh, bring them on. Let them send what they can send. I dont care about losing rune, to some NH pieces of crap.


 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image user posted image

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:29 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: bto
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3815
Member No.: 196
Joined: February 3, 2008
Total Events Attended: 332
Its not our fight

To be honest, I think it would cause way too much chaos in WG. I believe we should stand up in our morals, but we're just a speckle in the clan world. It would hurt us way more to continue this then to let things just go.

We're also not strong enough. They're way out of our league.
It would take alot of effort to bring down VR, too much at our cost.
 
--------------------
bto
user posted image
Ex-WG Warlord
user posted image
"It is our direction, not our intentions, that lead us to our destinations."

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:31 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Geofff
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 1238
Member No.: 608
Joined: May 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 96
There is NO proof that Vr hacked TT.
The most trustworthy theory so far is that the spies in TT gave their forum accounts to Vr.
This was a very rash decision in joining TT.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:34 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Aardvark
Group: Banned
Posts: 759
Member No.: 322
Joined: March 13, 2008
Total Events Attended: 175
QUOTE (Back to Own @ January 10, 2009 08:29 pm)
Its not our fight

To be honest, I think it would cause way too much chaos in WG. I believe we should stand up in our morals, but we're just a speckle in the clan world. It would hurt us way more to continue this then to let things just go.

We're also not strong enough. They're way out of our league.
It would take alot of effort to bring down VR, too much at our cost.

Well said mate, but the fact of making it harder for any new people to join only makes us wealer, too many restrictions etc, extenxive back ground checks can help with that etc. but the easieats way for them to do it is to remove the persons name from clan list etc, but this new restrictiuon is still gonna hurt us
 
--------------------
user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:37 amTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Banned
Posts: 2447
Member No.: 114
Joined: January 8, 2008
Total Events Attended: 149
Makes me wonder what else Dalejamesw has said that Council/Tertiaries just believed him in... Maybe they should rethink anything he's said or told them.
 
--------------------

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:39 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Aardvark
Group: Banned
Posts: 759
Member No.: 322
Joined: March 13, 2008
Total Events Attended: 175
agreed
 
--------------------
user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:43 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Useph
Group: Guest
Posts: 267
Member No.: 125
Joined: January 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 29
WG (Guardian+ Rank) should have had a vote if we should have assisted WG or not (somewhere in IA or something). If the poll had been kept open for even a measly 2 hours I'm sure at least 30% of WG would have voted and the results would be fairly clear. Who's decision was it to have WG help some clan in some private issue, besides your own?

I think WG should have just remained neutral in the issue, as well as all issues, to be honest.
 
--------------------
Goals
78/99 user posted image | 99/99 user posted image | 92/99 user posted image | 94/99 user posted image | 82/99 user posted image | 99/99 user posted image | 77/99 user posted image
mIRC Guru
user posted image
WG's #1 Pyromaniac

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:45 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
Inaction is not an answer to the degrading standards of the clan world, though I see the value of waiting until we strengthen.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: January 11, 2009 01:59 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Useph
Group: Guest
Posts: 267
Member No.: 125
Joined: January 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 29
QUOTE (His Lordship @ January 10, 2009 08:45 pm)
Inaction is not an answer to the degrading standards of the clan world, though I see the value of waiting until we strengthen.

Helping a rather weak clan and then getting all of our planned wilderness events ruined by two strong clans isn't the answer either. It's just added fuel to the fire of something we didn't have to be part of.

Not that I care much for wars in the wilderness instead of clan wars, perhaps others do.
 
--------------------
Goals
78/99 user posted image | 99/99 user posted image | 92/99 user posted image | 94/99 user posted image | 82/99 user posted image | 99/99 user posted image | 77/99 user posted image
mIRC Guru
user posted image
WG's #1 Pyromaniac

Posted: January 11, 2009 02:01 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Dilz
Group: Banned
Posts: 1403
Member No.: 973
Joined: June 23, 2008
Total Events Attended: 151
My view on this is:

1. Ban Dale from WG or something, since he's joined DF hes just become a fag. As most of you know I used to respect him...alot. Now thats gone to nothing.

2. We should help TT, yes, but not crash. We should only go if we are asked to, not just show up and crash.
 
--------------------
user posted image
LOLPNS
user posted image
Perm banned.

Posted: January 11, 2009 02:02 amTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Banned
Posts: 2447
Member No.: 114
Joined: January 8, 2008
Total Events Attended: 149
QUOTE (Dilz621 @ January 10, 2009 06:01 pm)
My view on this is:

1. Ban Dale from WG or something, since he's joined DF hes just become a fag. As most of you know I used to respect him...alot. Now thats gone to nothing.

2. We should help TT, yes, but not crash. We should only go if we are asked to, not just show up and crash.

Posted: January 11, 2009 02:03 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Dilz
Group: Banned
Posts: 1403
Member No.: 973
Joined: June 23, 2008
Total Events Attended: 151
QUOTE (Winddancir @ January 11, 2009 02:02 am)
QUOTE (Dilz621 @ January 10, 2009 06:01 pm)
My view on this is:

1. Ban Dale from WG or something, since he's joined DF hes just become a fag. As most of you know I used to respect him...alot. Now thats gone to nothing.

2. We should help TT, yes, but not crash. We should only go if we are asked to, not just show up and crash.

Ok good. Shame really as I considered him a great friend. But I guess thats what DF does to you.
 
--------------------
user posted image
LOLPNS
user posted image
Perm banned.

Posted: January 11, 2009 02:10 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Robertw56
Group: Guest
Posts: 1908
Member No.: 15
Joined: December 29, 2007
Total Events Attended: 118
I suggest we stay out of the whole situation, it can only put a bad taste to the name WG.
 
--------------------
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

Posted: January 11, 2009 02:23 amTop
   


IRC Nickname:
Group: Banned
Posts: 2447
Member No.: 114
Joined: January 8, 2008
Total Events Attended: 149
QUOTE (Dilz621 @ January 10, 2009 06:03 pm)
QUOTE (Winddancir @ January 11, 2009 02:02 am)
QUOTE (Dilz621 @ January 10, 2009 06:01 pm)
My view on this is:

1. Ban Dale from WG or something, since he's joined DF hes just become a fag. As most of you know I used to respect him...alot. Now thats gone to nothing.

2. We should help TT, yes, but not crash. We should only go if we are asked to, not just show up and crash.

Ok good. Shame really as I considered him a great friend. But I guess thats what DF does to you.

Yeah. He's cut so many of the ties that once made him WG. Like I said... What other things has he said?

QUOTE (Winddancir @ January 10, 2009 05:37 pm)
Makes me wonder what else Dalejamesw has said that Council/Tertiaries just believed him in...
Maybe they should rethink anything he's said or told them.

 
--------------------

Posted: January 11, 2009 02:27 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Cam
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 749
Member No.: 24
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 69
Dalejamesw should be blacklisted and put in the hall of shame, ex-council have done less and received harsher treatment.
 
--------------------
user posted image
Halo 3 - General Grade 3 ~ CoD4 - 10th Prestige 55 ~ MW2 - 9th Prestige 50
Joined WG 8th August 2006 - Im old School son

Pages: (3) [1] 2 3