. : News : . . : Message of the Week : .
You are currently viewing an archive of the Wilderness Guardians clan's IPB1 forums.

These forums were used by WG from 2008 to 2011, and now exist for historical and achival purposes only.

For the clan's current forums, CLICK HERE.
"You are a Wilderness Guardian. That northern wasteland; that land of blood, desolation and death is your dominion. Tonight we are going home."
~His Lordship
War Alert: OFF Raid Alert: OFF
PM a WG Official

Pages: (6) [1] 2 3 4 5 6

 Raise the requirements?
Posted: February 12, 2009 12:53 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
This is not a definitive poll. I just want the clan's opinion, from which I will make my own judgment.

PROS OF A REQUIREMENT RAISE
  • We will attract more higher level members
  • Such members won't get KO'd and probably have better knowledge of the wilderness
  • Our clan will appear stronger to the clan world
  • Spies will find it marginally harder to join
  • Lower levelled members will be encouraged to train

CONS OF A REQUIREMENT RAISE
  • The higher the reqs go, the more elitist WG gets, moving away from the initial premise for us to be a clan for all.
  • A lot of clans have 105 reqs. If we raise, we lose our appeal to lower levels who are training to join a top clan. (Check the Apps forum. 8 out of the last 15 accepted apps would not meet a 105 req)
  • The community will shift to more combat focus
  • It would be motivation to train by force rather than encouragement
  • What's better? A clan of 60 Lvl 110+, or a Clan of 60 Lvl110+ and 30 100+?

 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: February 12, 2009 12:55 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Robertw56
Group: Guest
Posts: 1908
Member No.: 15
Joined: December 29, 2007
Total Events Attended: 118
Voted hash.png
 
--------------------
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

Posted: February 12, 2009 12:55 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
4 people, including Robertw56, voted without weighing the pros and cons.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: February 12, 2009 12:57 amTop
   


IRC Nickname: [Randy]
Group: Raid Leader
Posts: 5065
Member No.: 16
Joined: December 29, 2007
Total Events Attended: 499
I voted 105. Anything above that seems like a big step. If 105 works, then raise it. I think if we raise it our recruitment will go down the shitter. But if it works, it will make us stronger. Hm....
 
--------------------

user posted imageuser posted image

Posted: February 12, 2009 12:58 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Useph
Group: Guest
Posts: 267
Member No.: 125
Joined: January 12, 2008
Total Events Attended: 29
I voted no - but I don't really care what the Reqs are, nor will making them above 105 combat speed up my training.
 
--------------------
Goals
78/99 user posted image | 99/99 user posted image | 92/99 user posted image | 94/99 user posted image | 82/99 user posted image | 99/99 user posted image | 77/99 user posted image
mIRC Guru
user posted image
WG's #1 Pyromaniac

Posted: February 12, 2009 12:58 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Sithofwookie
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 2842
Member No.: 815
Joined: June 11, 2008
Total Events Attended: 48
Personally I'd like to see the req be 105+ but at the same time not be more combat focused.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: February 12, 2009 12:58 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Robertw56
Group: Guest
Posts: 1908
Member No.: 15
Joined: December 29, 2007
Total Events Attended: 118
QUOTE (His Lordship @ February 12, 2009 12:55 am)
4 people, including Robertw56, voted without weighing the pros and cons.

I know what I want.
 
--------------------
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

Posted: February 12, 2009 12:59 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
QUOTE (Robertw56 @ February 12, 2009 12:58 am)
QUOTE (His Lordship @ February 12, 2009 12:55 am)
4 people, including Robertw56, voted without weighing the pros and cons.

I know what I want.

But do you know what I want and why?
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:01 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Robertw56
Group: Guest
Posts: 1908
Member No.: 15
Joined: December 29, 2007
Total Events Attended: 118
QUOTE (His Lordship @ February 12, 2009 12:59 am)
QUOTE (Robertw56 @ February 12, 2009 12:58 am)
QUOTE (His Lordship @ February 12, 2009 12:55 am)
4 people, including Robertw56, voted without weighing the pros and cons.

I know what I want.

But do you know what I want and why?

What you want is different from what the clan wants.
 
--------------------
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:02 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
QUOTE (Robertw56 @ February 12, 2009 01:01 am)
QUOTE (His Lordship @ February 12, 2009 12:59 am)
QUOTE (Robertw56 @ February 12, 2009 12:58 am)
QUOTE (His Lordship @ February 12, 2009 12:55 am)
4 people, including Robertw56, voted without weighing the pros and cons.

I know what I want.

But do you know what I want and why?

What you want is different from what the clan wants.

What I want is different from the clan's wants, but exactly the same as their needs.
If I have to stop my kids from eating junk food, I will no matter how much they want it.
At least I'm keeping an open mind about this.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:07 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: [ FlAmEy ]
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 848
Member No.: 138
Joined: January 20, 2008
Total Events Attended: 123
i voted for 105+, i'd to see use with more experienced warring members but i also don't want to raise our reqs to high so it discourages lower levels on joining our Community.

~Flamey
 
--------------------
WG since january 28TH 2008

user posted image

user posted image

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:09 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Hyperion
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 1636
Member No.: 978
Joined: June 23, 2008
Total Events Attended: 141
Voted no, although i meet all set levels there, it would be a shame to loose so many people, and to also not be able to gain that many. It is the lower levels of the clan that keep us active with the skills. (not saying anything against the higher levels) But even myself i still consider myself a lower level and would like to see that clan have the same amount of memebers, and stay focused they way it is.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image
Dragon boots:29 Whips:2

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:13 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
Agreed Sooth.
Lower levels give us a reality check.
They make sure we're not like the powerhouse clans that value people for how good they are in the wild.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:19 amTop
   


IRC Nickname: Kero2|bryan
Group: Guest
Posts: 1302
Member No.: 91
Joined: January 2, 2008
Total Events Attended: 26
I voted yes being honest. 107 cmb +

Or do kero2 reqs 100+ rune and your fine tongue.gif

But ya seriously I dotn mean to piss of any of WG skillers/ cmb haters. But trust me it would look good. And then we should have a monthly skill wars tongue.gif
 
--------------------
Best pure f2p Guardian
user posted image

Post here
http://www.wildernessguardians.com/forum/i...owtopic=20&st=0

user posted image
user posted image

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:22 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Brian|30
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 565
Member No.: 1547
Joined: December 13, 2008
Total Events Attended: 75
I voted knowing the pros and cons. It wasn't a blind move. You can't treat everyone like their 6 Elias.
 
--------------------
Dragon Claws Drops: 1 2
Dragonic Visage Drops: 1
Ruined Dragon Drops: 1
Abyssal Whip Drops: 1 2

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:22 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Plano|Adam
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 1449
Member No.: 228
Joined: February 13, 2008
Total Events Attended: 107
i said 105+
i dont think its too much of a hassle and if u dont have the time to get the level you really dun play enough to be a decent member.

105 is like 79 in atk, str, and def, and like 60 prayer. and it will also boost morale during wars/raids, knowing we have a better chance at having a succesful one at all.
 
--------------------
user posted image
"If at first you don’t succeed, call it version 1.0"

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:23 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Kiwi011
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3052
Member No.: 40
Joined: December 30, 2007
Total Events Attended: 21
No, everytime we raise req's we loose members and go into a recession and loose 70% of our members. I would rather have the lower levels who will grow in WG and stay WG rather than lvl 110 clan hoppers who just want a clan to be in.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:25 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: His Lordship
Group: Founder
Posts: 6029
Member No.: 1
Joined: December 26, 2007
Total Events Attended: 129
QUOTE (Kiwi011 @ February 12, 2009 01:23 am)
No, everytime we raise req's we loose members and go into a recession and loose 70% of our members. I would rather have the lower levels who will grow in WG and stay WG rather than lvl 110 clan hoppers who just want a clan to be in.

At least someone remembers the old requirement raises.
Such a shame I have to prove this theory every year to show the newer guys.
 
--------------------
user posted image

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:29 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Billis
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 113
Member No.: 1668
Joined: January 28, 2009
Total Events Attended: 8
Your leaving out members with 100cmb and 90 mage or range
i voted for 105 cuz its not that big of a jump LOL
But 80-85-80 or 80-80-80 with a 90+ in mage or range
Witch i fall into that category
 
--------------------
"No man is an island entire of itself; every man is a piece of the Continent, a part of the main.... Any man's death diminishes me because I am involved in Mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee."

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:31 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Hyperion
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 1636
Member No.: 978
Joined: June 23, 2008
Total Events Attended: 141
QUOTE (Billis2525 @ February 11, 2009 08:29 pm)
Your leaving out members with 100cmb and 90 mage or range
i voted for 105 cuz its not that big of a jump LOL
But 80-85-80 or 80-80-80 with a 90+ in mage or range
Witch i fall into that category

lies you have 89 range and 81 mage.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image
Dragon boots:29 Whips:2

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:32 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Lefty
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3340
Member No.: 1055
Joined: June 30, 2008
Total Events Attended: 211
Okay let's get away from the skilling part of WG even more.
Let's try to become a powerhouse clan that looks good to RSC because we war a lot and are all about combat.
Let's turn away those applicants that see WG as a clan with equal interest in many things.

I know I joined WG for some combat based events, but I also joined WG because WG was an all-around clan; something that did a little of everything. When you ask to improve the combat part of a clan, you basically take what was in everything else (skilling and the community) and you put that into the third leg, the combat area. If you increase the requirements, you are taking away from other aspects of WG.

Honestly, a person who does not like us because we are 100+ and not 105+ is just a greedy person who wants to be an elitist, and will have the chances of being a power-hungry bastard. I have seen it in my previous clan, but this is just a generalization, not a fact.

If someone gets KO'd at a war, who's fault is it but their own? What is wrong with that? They lose a set of rune? How can that really matter? We are too critical on those who get KO'd when we all know, it happens to the best of us. I know a few people that are better tanks than higher levels regardless of their combat level, regardless of how much they like combat, and regardless of their defense level. If you want to lower the chances of getting KO'd, put those who do get KO'd into the conditions inwhich they would for them to get used to the environment.

How does them getting KO'd really matter though? That is the true question. If it is a full-out war, they helped us while they were alive. If it is a PKRI, they lose a set, we lose what? Nothing.

Honestly, I would rather WG look like a little clan that has their great community and then go out and show whatever clan up that challenges us, or denies us our power, than to look like a VR or DF to the clan world. I do not want the huge rep and expectations that everyone puts onto a "top" clan. The "top" clans should be ranked on their performance rather than their levels, and if we can pull 70+ 100+ over 60+ 105+, I don't think that the clan world is really going to care about the 5 levels that are required by entry requirements; they will look at our numbers, our opts.

We have had few problems with spies within WG. One of them was in WG before I was. There is nothing and no-one to fault for that. Any person who is willing to train a level 100 to spy on a clan will train the 5 extra levels to spy. Those who love combat, will spend the extra time for 5 combat levels. Also if the person has used the account to spy on a clan before, then it will already be 105+ if your statement is true about other clans being 105+.

I know for sure that raising the requirements will not encourage me to train any harder. I train at the pace I can, and what I gain is what I gain. Most of the people who are below 105 combat have a head-strong attitude about this the same way as I.

To those who are 105+ and say "Why not?" think if you are answering because you are 105+, or if you think it will really be for the better of the clan.

I believe that I have just argued every point that you have posed on the Cons section in your original post, Elias.

Also while it is somewhat relevant; Who really cares about RSC and what information is on there? Anyone who is semi-active in the higher clan world knows about clans and knows that the RAW list is a joke. We are top 10 and we have a low requirement than top clans. If someone who knows nothing about clans looks around and they are 100+, then they will see us because of our requirements. And completely honestly, I looked from the bottom of the RAW list to the top because I was scared of requirements.

Should be about it for now.. As you can see, my vote is NO.
 
--------------------
user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image
user posted image
user posted image

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:32 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Brian|30
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 565
Member No.: 1547
Joined: December 13, 2008
Total Events Attended: 75
A higher combat usually means a higher activity by it's members. To be honest you could play RS half-assed and get 100 combat. Now of course, there's plenty of great, 105- members, but if they care a rat's ass they'll be willing to level up 5 levels.

So my opinion for the 105+ only is to increase activity. Because of this, I think a certain total level skill count should be another way to get in the clan, being you are level 100.

If we lose 70% of our members over this slight increase of requirements, we're obviously not as tight as a community as we thought, and probably don't deserve a strong clan. If we're purely a community clan, why not release the requirements all together. If people leave over an increase good. They were obviously either not active enough to be in this clan, or not willing enough to be.
 
--------------------
Dragon Claws Drops: 1 2
Dragonic Visage Drops: 1
Ruined Dragon Drops: 1
Abyssal Whip Drops: 1 2

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:36 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Billis
Group: Clan Friend
Posts: 113
Member No.: 1668
Joined: January 28, 2009
Total Events Attended: 8
QUOTE (For Sooth @ February 11, 2009 08:31 pm)
QUOTE (Billis2525 @ February 11, 2009 08:29 pm)
Your leaving out members with 100cmb and 90 mage or range
i voted for 105 cuz its not that big of a jump LOL
But 80-85-80 or 80-80-80 with a 90+ in mage or range
Witch i fall into that category

lies you have 89 range and 81 mage.

But im also almost 101 cmb biggrin.gif
and i said range or mage
 
--------------------
"No man is an island entire of itself; every man is a piece of the Continent, a part of the main.... Any man's death diminishes me because I am involved in Mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee."

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:37 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Hyperion
Group: Ex-Member
Posts: 1636
Member No.: 978
Joined: June 23, 2008
Total Events Attended: 141
QUOTE (Kero2 @ February 11, 2009 08:19 pm)
I voted yes being honest. 107 cmb +

Or do kero2 reqs 100+ rune and your fine tongue.gif

But ya seriously I dotn mean to piss of any of WG skillers/ cmb haters. But trust me it would look good. And then we should have a monthly skill wars tongue.gif

So your going for what makes the clan look good in numbers, and not what holds that clan together, it's member?
a lvl 128 can be the greatest warrer we have, but be a huge dick and break the clan/make people leave.
While a 104 can hold their own in clans, not standing out like an mvp, but makes it to 95% of all events and gives good feedback/posts, and welcomes people to wg.

Looking good with numbers isn't the only thing for WG here.



-----------------------------


EDIT to 30 str owns.

Just because they are 100 combat doesn't mean they are playing half assed. How do we know that they haven't only been playing for 9-14 months.
I've been playing 6 years now, and what am i, lvl 113.
Don't just a book by it's cover. Don't judge a noob by its level.
 
--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image
Dragon boots:29 Whips:2

Posted: February 12, 2009 01:38 amTop
   
User Avatar

IRC Nickname: Lefty
Group: Emeritus
Posts: 3340
Member No.: 1055
Joined: June 30, 2008
Total Events Attended: 211
QUOTE (Planolocal @ February 11, 2009 08:22 pm)
i dont think its too much of a hassle and if u dont have the time to get the level you really dun play enough to be a decent member.

I don't have time to train to worry about a combat level, and I believe I play more than enough to be a decent member. Tell me if I am wrong though.

QUOTE (Planolocal @ February 11, 2009 08:22 pm)
105 is like 79 in atk, str, and def, and like 60 prayer.

Attack: 83 Strength: 84 Defense: 84 HP: 85 Prayer: 70

Those are basic levels for 105 F2P combat. A pretty big difference actually.

QUOTE (Planolocal @ February 11, 2009 08:22 pm)
and it will also boost morale during wars/raids, knowing we have a better chance at having a succesful one at all.

How will having higher combat levels boost our morale more than having more numbers?



 
--------------------
user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image
user posted image
user posted image

Pages: (6) [1] 2 3 4 5 6