Back to Topic Index

[Recap] WG vs 3v0 P2P then F2P

By ArSeNaLfAn32 on 06/08/2008
Many of the WG were interested in a war. We talked to 3v0 and originally set up a best of 3 P2P with no summon, all styles, middle bounds, and +/- 3 instead of Matched. We massed 17 kids and walked to the middle waiting for 3v0 to attack. 3v0 decimated us quickly. I was not expecting them to all be barraging in full ahrims. We stood no chance. After a minute or two we were all dead.
nstead of continuing down an ugly path of 1-2 more p2p fights, I set up a free to play fight with 3v0. The rules were matched options, melee + binds, and middle bounds. It was a 9 v 9 starting fight. (we cut 5) We had good pile transitions and switches, with great sniping and antisniping. 3v0 stood no chance. We only lost one man in the end.
Gf 3v0. You truly are a powerhouse in pay to play fighting.
Both Attendance Pics:
user posted image
user posted image


By Mistah Vince on 06/08/2008
Jaja, fun stuff.

Gf guys, we totally pwned in f2p.

P2p...not so much. xD

By NightRawrs on 06/08/2008
Ye i gud turn up pls


By Ragingwealth on 06/08/2008
Missed seeing this >.< looked like fun though tongue.gif

By Nick on 06/08/2008
Everyone did a fantastic job in F2P today. There was not much that we could have done in P2P though. We were outnumbered, with P2P not being our strong point, and apparently that is 3v0's. Gf 3v0.

Great tanking + great sniping + great hybrids in F2P.

By T Dwag on 07/08/2008
We need to work on our P2P skills but we did well in F2P. Good job guys hash.png




Brandon

By Pyroclastic0 on 07/08/2008
if i was p2p we would of won both hash.png



Back to Topic Index

Developed by Mojo.