Back to Topic Index
IRC Chatrooms
By Big Al 002 on 02/08/2009
Atm our #Alliance_H_Q room is quite dead, and I came up with some solutions to increase activity in some of our channels.
Option #1
We could totally delete #wg and use the lobby and #Alliance_H_Q, while keeping #wgwilderness.
Option #2
Delete #wg, keep lobby, wgwilderness, and alliance_h_q.
Option #3
Delete alliance_h_q, delete #wg, keep lobby and alliance_h_q and make a specific channel for trial guardians
Idk. Perhaps you can create something? It's really hard to not talk in #wg, and I'd rather not watch automated messages going out when something better could be done with them. Honestly.
Option #1
We could totally delete #wg and use the lobby and #Alliance_H_Q, while keeping #wgwilderness.
Option #2
Delete #wg, keep lobby, wgwilderness, and alliance_h_q.
Option #3
Delete alliance_h_q, delete #wg, keep lobby and alliance_h_q and make a specific channel for trial guardians
Idk. Perhaps you can create something? It's really hard to not talk in #wg, and I'd rather not watch automated messages going out when something better could be done with them. Honestly.
By George on 02/08/2009
Oh #alliance_H_Q still going?
Eh the allied leaders weren't pushing it so it grew inactive.
Too frequent talks with our allies was clearly not meant to be.
We should just keep the lobby, wg and the wgwilderness.
Eh the allied leaders weren't pushing it so it grew inactive.
Too frequent talks with our allies was clearly not meant to be.
We should just keep the lobby, wg and the wgwilderness.
By Big Al 002 on 02/08/2009
| QUOTE (Gorgemaster @ August 02, 2009 02:39 pm) |
| Oh #alliance_H_Q still going? Eh the allied leaders weren't pushing it so it grew inactive. Too frequent talks with our allies was clearly not meant to be. We should just keep the lobby, wg and the wgwilderness. |
i agree. it is still going and i can still talk in the channel
i kind of like that suggestion but its still hard to keep lobby talk and wg talk separated. um..
we should keep a lobby, #wgwilderness, and a help channel where we keep trials (unfinished)
you know what, lmao, im stuck ill come back to this later.
By Angus0000 on 02/08/2009
You seem to have animosity towards #WG in your plans.
By Onathe on 02/08/2009
The alliance chat kind of failed, when ever i entered everyone was WG or the allied leaders who just idled in there, no ally members ever went in there tbh.
By Big Al 002 on 03/08/2009
| QUOTE (Angus0000 @ August 02, 2009 03:43 pm) |
| You seem to have animosity towards #WG in your plans. |
why is shields our private conversations
By ThisIsUnique on 03/08/2009
i think its fine the way it is
By David on 03/08/2009
It is fine the way it is, besides you're contradicting and repeating yourself, lol.
Option #1
Option #1
| QUOTE |
| We could totally delete #wg and use the lobby and #Alliance_H_Q, while keeping #wgwilderness. |
Option #2
| QUOTE |
| Delete #wg, keep lobby, wgwilderness, and alliance_h_q. |
So, we could either delete #wg, and use the lobby, Alliance_H_Q and #wgwilderness (option #1) OR delete #wg, keep the lobby, Alliance_H_Q and #wgwilderness (option #2). Personally don't see much difference...lol?
Or there is Option #3:
| QUOTE |
| Delete alliance_h_q, delete #wg, keep lobby and alliance_h_q and make a specific channel for trial guardians |
We could delete, and keep Alliance_H_Q. And add a new room for trials which would coincide with the lobby where they're allowed also.
SO Option #3 does God knows what with Alliance_H_Q. Deletes #wg, leaving us with our public chat room for trials to come into. And gives us a new room for trials...wait a second...aren't they already allowed into #wg? So what exactly would we benefit?
Lol.
Absolutely nothing is wrong with our current system.
By Big Al 002 on 03/08/2009
L.
1
alliance_h_q is still dead
2.
keeping the lobby and using are different, truth be told this topic was for alliance_h_q
1
alliance_h_q is still dead
2.
keeping the lobby and using are different, truth be told this topic was for alliance_h_q
By JC on 03/08/2009
This topic has done one thing:
Confuse the person who created it
Confuse the person who created it
By Tnuac on 03/08/2009
#wg may seem pointless but its been with the history of the clan so can't really be deleted in that sense. Its a living section of history.
Alliance HQ - thats active during events though right?
Alliance HQ - thats active during events though right?
By rachellove9 on 03/08/2009
I was never going to add alliance one. That is to many to watch when I have my own and friends to visit.
My suggestion is this When You sign into IRC just go to #WG_lobby for your first 10 minutes or something then enter #WG. This way you have already chatted to the ones in the lobby before going to our private chat. It is sorta like when you go to a party, you talk to people then go settle in and party with your friends.
My suggestion is this When You sign into IRC just go to #WG_lobby for your first 10 minutes or something then enter #WG. This way you have already chatted to the ones in the lobby before going to our private chat. It is sorta like when you go to a party, you talk to people then go settle in and party with your friends.
By ThisIsUnique on 03/08/2009
in a party u just get drunk O.o
By Bassism on 03/08/2009
Option 1 and 2 are the same, option 3 makes no sense, and everything is fine the way it is, if we need to talk to allies we can go to their IRC, or they can come to ours.
By Back to Own on 03/08/2009
We pushed for #alliance_h_q. We kept it active while it was created. Not gonna lie, our allies didnt really help at all in its survivall.
I did suggest removing #wg as private channel and using that or #wgwilderness as the warring channel in order to keep lobby active, but there are obvious consequences for that.
Its fine atm imo.
I did suggest removing #wg as private channel and using that or #wgwilderness as the warring channel in order to keep lobby active, but there are obvious consequences for that.
Its fine atm imo.
By Big Al 002 on 03/08/2009
| QUOTE (Back to Own @ August 03, 2009 02:37 pm) |
| We pushed for #alliance_h_q. We kept it active while it was created. Not gonna lie, our allies didnt really help at all in its survivall. I did suggest removing #wg as private channel and using that or #wgwilderness as the warring channel in order to keep lobby active, but there are obvious consequences for that. Its fine atm imo. |
done deal close/lock topic
By David on 03/08/2009
Glad we were able to stick with what we've got.
Locked at the author's request.
Locked at the author's request.
Back to Topic Index