Back to Topic Index

Leecable

By George on 06/12/2009
IF THIS CONTENT REMOVES LEVEL TWO THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE WILL FACE A PERMANENT BAN.
WG knows what has happened and the reasons why, but quotes from here and pictures MUST NOT LEAVE.

QUOTE   original level four post)

(22:40:10) <%leecable> Your innactive as fucking shit
(22:40:16) <%leecable> fucking stpe fucking down
(22:40:22) <%leecable> you power mad fucking idio

(22:44:05) <%leecable> Your fucking power mad
(22:44:07) <%leecable> you wont step down
(22:44:12) <%leecable> because you like your rank
(22:44:16) <%leecable> stop being such a fucking douche
(22:44:19) <%leecable> yur not active enough

(22:42:42) <%leecable> Lazy council are fucking lazy

(22:42:26) <%leecable> Go on
(22:42:28) <%leecable> fuck off.

(22:41:00) <%leecable> 3/4 of wg wants you to stpe down

(22:40:10) <%leecable> Your innactive as fucking shit
(22:40:16) <%leecable> fucking stpe fucking down
(22:40:22) <%leecable> you power mad fucking idio


The reason for this post is to inform you all that Gene has taken the decision to temporarily demote Leecable from the staff for 4 weeks.

Reasons can be found below if you care to scroll down to Lordy's posts.

I am very sorry that it turned out this way Lee.
It wasn't my decision, and I didn't want it to come to this.
But after what you said to me i'm not at all surprised this happened.
The insults alone in IRC/TS could have been put aside, but the fact that you made that abusive IA that Lordy soon deleted really brought the matter to a head.

Your rank will come back to you on Friday 8th January 2009 at 7pm GMT/2pm EST.

~George

By George on 06/12/2009
He then posts an IA asking me to resign.
What the FUCK has happened to this guy who is supposed to be supporting the Council.

By Kyle on 06/12/2009
<content removed>

By George on 06/12/2009
<content removed>

By Kyle on 06/12/2009
<content removed to maintain Level Four privacy>

By DZ on 07/12/2009
What happened to this IA I am hearing about? I would have liked to have been able to see it myself. I was basically gone all day as my first exam is tomorrow morning and I came back to several IRC pms about it.

By George on 07/12/2009
It was so abusive, you really didn't want to see it.
<content removed to maintain Level Four privacy>

By His Lordship on 08/12/2009
Demote Leecable under my orders and quote this to him:
Your behavior, irrespective of whom it was directed at, reflects poorly on your position. Your rank is suspended from you until your behaviour reflects that expected from a leader.

By George on 08/12/2009
Are you sure Gene?
<content removed to maintain Level Four privacy>

By His Lordship on 08/12/2009
Perhaps move this topic to level 3 or 2 as verification. Be sure to emphasise this as a
4 week suspension and not a demotion... unless the behavior continues. He can't get away from it.

By George on 08/12/2009
Moved to Level Two.

By Lee on 08/12/2009
Lol.

By rachellove9 on 08/12/2009
Sigh. I am very sad and understand this.

By Randy on 08/12/2009
Ok... so i'll still be asking Lee to lead once you realize we have no leaders on ever.

Way to conisder all the negative consequences in play.
Because demoting him was the absolute only option?

By Dorcha3377 on 08/12/2009
Basically I hate to say this from a clan standpoint, but Randy is right.

So who will lead our raids? Gorge or DZ?


Please understand I am not trying to be smart mouthed. I am very concerned where this will end up.

By Randy on 08/12/2009
Also, no offence, but Lordy's leading from the sidelines.
It doesn't seem like much thought was put into this.

Warnings?
Suspension?
Nah, we'll just demote him and let the clan suffer.

By Lee on 08/12/2009
QUOTE   WG_KR @ December 08, 2009 02:15 pm)

Ok... so i'll still be asking Lee to lead once you realize we have no leaders on ever.

Way to conisder all the negative consequences in play.
Because demoting him was the absolute only option?

WG Keanu for raid leader.

By ThisIsUnique on 08/12/2009
QUOTE   Leecable @ December 08, 2009 02:27 pm)

QUOTE   WG_KR
December 08, 2009 02:15 pm

Ok... so i'll still be asking Lee to lead once you realize we have no leaders on ever.

Way to conisder all the negative consequences in play.
Because demoting him was the absolute only option?

WG Keanu for raid leader.

+7

By rachellove9 on 08/12/2009
Who in the clan has led before? Let's try to be a bit supportive. It is only 4 weeks and I am hoping Lee will be ready to lead upon his return.

Maybe you could ask lets say Steve, Jess, Joe or Tweek. I really don't know who all has led or how good they are but our pvp really can't take a beating for this. We want to have people ready to follow Lee on his return to his position too.

Our ML is only 60 people we will have to pull together now to make this work. We can't start fighting among ourselves. What is done is done whether we like the outcome of it or not.

There is not a winning/losing side in this. Just pull together now and do what is best from this point on for the clan.

Rachy wub.gif

By Dorcha3377 on 08/12/2009
Tbh I wouldnt follow Tweek down a dark alley.
We have a warlord and two raid leaders. Things will work out they always do.
I realize Lee has Wg's best interests at heart. He is a wonderful raid leader and only was doing what he did out of desperation and frustration.

By Mustangred1 on 08/12/2009
So much drama.



By VEPHYSAURAS on 08/12/2009
I think Stokenut would be good while Lee is away. If he is into it, I don't know. He should be since he applied for Council and wants to bring back the fighting in WG.

By Lee on 08/12/2009
Dont want the rank back. Keep it.

By VEPHYSAURAS on 09/12/2009
QUOTE   Leecable @ December 08, 2009 06:13 pm)

Dont want the rank back. Keep it.

Feel relieved?

By His Lordship on 09/12/2009
Let steve lead. I don't care if lee is the only capable one. His behavior is unworthy of the rank. If someone is a dickhead, the fact that they are best suited to a job should not make them immune. I may be leading from the sidelines but I know enough to make the call. If I let this slide it would be bias. That lee can't lead is his fault alone. If you ask him to,lead that is cool, but he is not a raid leader and does not have th3 authority that comes with that. Lee, the fact that you are laughing at this is just further insulting us. You know how much I enjoy chatting with you but I am in leader mode. Don't take this as a sign I don't like you.

By Lee on 09/12/2009
QUOTE   His Lordship @ December 09, 2009 02:29 am)

Let steve lead. I don't care if lee is the only capable one. His behavior is unworthy of the rank. If someone is a dickhead, the fact that they are best suited to a job should not make them immune. I may be leading from the sidelines but I know enough to make the call. If I let this slide it would be bias. That lee can't lead is his fault alone. If you ask him to,lead that is cool, but he is not a raid leader and does not have th3 authority that comes with that. Lee, the fact that you are laughing at this is just further insulting us. You know how much I enjoy chatting with you but I am in leader mode. Don't take this as a sign I don't like you.

Naa, I understand. I just like the way, all the other bits of convosation were removed. Made me see the light even more.

By JC on 09/12/2009
QUOTE   Dorcha3377 @ December 09, 2009 09:24 am)

Tbh I wouldnt follow Tweek down a dark alley.

BEST





POST





EVER



















Also applies to Keanu though hashdown.gif.png

By VEPHYSAURAS on 09/12/2009
LOL

Moving on tongue.gif

By George on 09/12/2009
QUOTE   Leecable @ December 09, 2009 09:25 am)

QUOTE   His Lordship
December 09, 2009 02:29 am

Let steve lead. I don't care if lee is the only capable one.  His behavior is unworthy of the rank. If someone is a dickhead, the fact that they are best suited to a job should not make them immune. I may be leading from the sidelines but I know enough to make the call. If I let this slide it would be bias. That lee can't lead is his fault alone. If you ask him to,lead that is cool, but he is not a raid leader and does not have th3 authority that comes with that. Lee, the fact that you are laughing at this is just further insulting us. You know how much I enjoy chatting with you but I am in leader mode. Don't take this as a sign I don't like you.

Naa, I understand. I just like the way, all the other bits of convosation were removed. Made me see the light even more.

The "content removed" bits were were other bits of level four information were in breach.
If I had kept those in then Level Four would be breached.



Back to Topic Index

Developed by Mojo.