Back to Topic Index

My Ideas on how to fix WG

By Chimpy on 23/02/2010
So yeah, part deux of my other rant topic, here it is, my solutions hash.png.

ACTIVITY BY ATTENDANCE PERCENTAGE
We did this in Team Kenya with much success.

We have a spread sheet with everyones name, and in one column we have our total amount of events, and in the other we have amounts attended by that member. Divide one by the other, x 100 and you got your activity percentage of each member.

I recommend starting at about 60% activity, 6 out of 10 events isn't really that much to ask for. And if events are out of your timezone or you have another overriding issue you can work something out with council or whoever will be managing it. Make Joe do it he's our excel and attendance man hash.png.


SKIPPING


Regardless of rank or merit, if you skip a war or pk, you get 40-60% Warn and a two week suspension. I would say just kick them but I'm trying to make a slight compromise for the hippies hash.png.


HIGHER REQUIREMENTS

Been alot of discussioni about this in level 2, matter fact it looks like we're going to go through with it (Pro leak hash.png), but I figured I'd post it here anyways.

I personally suggest either

~ 100+ FA, 105+ TG, 108+ full member ~
- Pros: Still have 100+ req
- Cons: We don't keep out old trial system, the new system would be more complicated.

~ 105+ TG, 110+ Full member; OR 100+ cmb with 94+ mage or 95+ range. ~
- Pros: More solid req., the 100+ alternative has good p2p member potential (many lvl ~100's that are mage/range tanks).
- Cons: Still means having low levels, but they can still be rather beneficial now no?

I likd #2 better myself.


ALL WARS MANDATORY SIGN UPS

) Signing up for every event with a prep over 3 days is MANDATORY. **

2) For every war/raid that you don't sign up for, you instantly get a warn level. ***

3) If you sign up as Yes and don't come TWICE, then you will be warned. ****

4) If you don't come to 3 events in a row WITHOUT legitimate reason, you will be warned, and if youre really that inactive probably kicked eventually.

5) Every Raid/War, matched or what have you, will be treated as EXTREMELY IMPORTANT, and will as stated have mandatory sign ups.


-----

** - Meaning that anything over 3 days prep, EVERYONE must sign up. Under 3 days and you're inactive at the time for whatever reason, and you don't sign up, ur gud.

*** - For every 3 events consecutively signed up for after that, warn level for not signing up gets erased.

**** - For every 2 events that you do sign up as yes for and do ccome to, warn will be erased.


MORE TRANSPARENCY

The Members don't know what is going on in levels 3 & 4, and we hear all the time "Don't worry it's being discussed in level 3/4" Then nothing ever comes out of it. Why not give like a weekly or monthly announcement, jsut saying what you guys are talking about, or maybe just talk about more things in level 1. I don't really think most of the stuff you guys talk about in there is UBER SEEKRAT.

The Members really feel distanced from the Council atm, and I think it's hurting us.


WAR BULLETINS TYPE THINGS IDK WHAT TO CALL IT

Just have BIG and BRIGHT notices at the top of the Forum with links to the fight topic, or have a different way of making noticing events easier. The PvP events forum hardly ever gets read, even though it should, and it's because people only see the bumped topic from the forum index, not all the other ones. And it can get a bit confusing when you have alot of wars in one week.

EXAMPLES:

Forum Heading:
http://img194.imageshack.us/i/eventnotice1b.png/

Alternative Events Forums layout:
http://img717.imageshack.us/i/eventnotice2.png/

They're ugly and annoying but they work pretty damn good.


AUDIO

Get Teamspeak 3. It's just as clear as mumble, has cooler stuffs, and it is far, far better for allied events. I invite the Sabres to pretty much all of our pks but they don't come because only like 3 have mumble downloaded, and you can't blame them really.

That's about it for now, if I think of something else or you want me to add something else, I will.

Discuss. AND DON'T FUCKING IGNORE!!!!

By VEPHYSAURAS on 23/02/2010
Good work lil fella.

By Uma on 23/02/2010
good ideas but i dont like the 40-60% warn for missing a war :/ not everyone can be available all the time

By Onathe on 23/02/2010
IF this gets done then EPIC. I'll watch this space. See what council say.

By Chimpy on 23/02/2010
QUOTE: Uma De Luz @ February 23, 2010 04:04 pm)
good ideas but i dont like the 40-60% warn for missing a war :/ not everyone can be available all the time

I didn't write that, it's only if they don't sign up and don't have a valid reason for not doing so. Same stands for skipping, if you're online, you're at the raid/war.

By Billy on 23/02/2010
Yes.

By Sonixpber on 23/02/2010
Yes to everything. Only problem is spur of the moment raids/events which should never be mandatory.

By Chimpy on 23/02/2010
QUOTE: Sonixpber @ February 23, 2010 04:07 pm)
Yes to everything. Only problem is spur of the moment raids/events which should never be mandatory.

I wouldn't hate this tooo much if we had more planned out raids that were mandatory.

By Quikdrawjoe on 23/02/2010
QUOTE: Chimpy @ February 23, 2010 08:58 pm)
ACTIVITY BY ATTENDANCE PERCENTAGE
We did this in Team Kenya with much success.

We have a spread sheet with everyones name, and in one column we have our total amount of events, and in the other we have amounts attended by that member. Divide one by the other, x 100 and you got your activity percentage of each member.

I recommend starting at about 60% activity, 6 out of 10 events isn't really that much to ask for. And if events are out of your timezone or you have another overriding issue you can work something out with council or whoever will be managing it. Make Joe do it he's our excel and attendance man hash.png.


SKIPPING

Regardless of rank or merit, if you skip a war or pk, you get 40-60% Warn and a two week suspension. I would say just kick them.

HIGHER REQUIREMENTS

~ 105+ TG, 110+ Full member; OR 100+ cmb with 94+ mage or 95+ range. ~

ALL WARS MANDATORY SIGN UPS

) Signing up for every event with a prep over 3 days is MANDATORY. **

3) If you sign up as Yes and don't come TWICE, then you will be warned. ****

4) If you don't come to 3 events in a row WITHOUT legitimate reason, you will be warned, and if youre really that inactive probably kicked eventually.

5) Every Raid/War, matched or what have you, will be treated as EXTREMELY IMPORTANT, and will as stated have mandatory sign ups.


-----

** - Meaning that anything over 3 days prep, EVERYONE must sign up. Under 3 days and you're inactive at the time for whatever reason, and you don't sign up, ur gud.


**** - For every 2 events that you do sign up as yes for and do ccome to, warn will be erased.


MORE TRANSPARENCY
Give like a weekly or monthly announcement, jsut saying what you guys are talking about, or maybe just talk about more things in level 1. I don't really think most of the stuff you guys talk about in there is UBER SEEKRAT.

WAR BULLETINS TYPE THINGS IDK WHAT TO CALL IT

Just have BIG and BRIGHT notices at the top of the Forum with links to the fight topic, or have a different way of making noticing events easier. The PvP events forum hardly ever gets read, even though it should, and it's because people only see the bumped topic from the forum index, not all the other ones. And it can get a bit confusing when you have alot of wars in one week.

EXAMPLES:

Forum Heading:
http://img194.imageshack.us/i/eventnotice1b.png/

AUDIO

Get Teamspeak 3. It's just as clear as mumble and it is far, far better for allied events. Only like 3 have mumble downloaded, and you can't blame them really.

Improved suggestion is improved.

By VEPHYSAURAS on 23/02/2010
QUOTE: Chimpy @ February 23, 2010 04:09 pm)
QUOTE: Sonixpber February 23, 2010 04:07 pm
Yes to everything. Only problem is spur of the moment raids/events which should never be mandatory.

I wouldn't hate this tooo much if we had more planned out raids that were mandatory.

lolz

By Chimpy on 23/02/2010
Thank you Joe for yet another useless post hash.png

By Quikdrawjoe on 23/02/2010
QUOTE: Chimpy @ February 23, 2010 09:13 pm)
Thank you Joe for yet another useless post hash.png

Thank you for not reading yet another useful post.

By Renegade3540 on 23/02/2010
Before people say that I'm too new, I have been going around and talking to people to get their opinions and ideas. This is a summary of it so far with my own ideas added in.

----

The first part: a new spreadsheet should be made for everyone and the same for new members who join after and events only start counting for them from the time they've joined. tongue.gif

What about when people go inactive with reason for extended periods of time and there percentage drops below it?

Personally I'm also more a fan of the second requirements option. However I don't feel we should raise the requirements before we start winning wars again.

----

A couple of things I'd like to add:

Start making sign ups for ALL Wars and Raids that have a prep time over 3 days and make signing up mandatory, miss 2 sign ups and you'll be sent a warning. Miss another without excuse and you get the boot.

-----

The members need to start contributing and when the council do agree to the option of starting to discuss stuff in public/ level 1 or 1.75 the members should not respond to serious topic with joke posts. The members need to start helping out the council as well by pointing out people who haven't signed up yet and by helping them to spam reminders in irc once in a while.

----

Wars need to by hyped up more and members should be told to train for upcomming wars to get them pumped up and leveld up. When you spent a lot more time preparing for a war the mentality will be better and you will want to win more. Negativity needs to be removed from the forums and members need to stop posting demotivating comments such as 'we're going to lose anyways' or things along that line.

-----

The council needs to get more involved with the clan members and should become more active and start engaging in IRC conversations as well, some do this yet several are lacking.

-----

A large part of the problem is that the community is too divided at the current time and unhappy.

By Chimpy on 23/02/2010
QUOTE
The first part: a new spreadsheet should be made for everyone and the same for new members who join after and events only start counting for them from the time they've joined.

What about when people go inactive with reason for extended periods of time and there percentage drops below it?


Good question, I'm sure there's a way to work out the kinks, for example putting like an "E" in there for excused and make it not hurt thier percentage. Knacker Joe/Robbie about it they're the spreadsheet queens.


QUOTE
Personally I'm also more a fan of the second requirements option. However I don't feel we should raise the requirements before we start winning wars again.

Higher reqs will help us win wars.


QUOTE
Start making sign ups for ALL Wars and Raids that have a prep time over 3 days and make signing up mandatory, miss 2 sign ups and you'll be sent a warning. Miss another without excuse and you get the boot.

Sounds good.


QUOTE
The members need to start contributing and when the council do agree to the option of starting to discuss stuff in public/ level 1 or 1.75 the members should not respond to serious topic with joke posts. The members need to start helping out the council as well by pointing out people who haven't signed up yet and by helping them to spam reminders in irc once in a while.

Agreed.


QUOTE
Wars need to by hyped up more and members should be told to train for upcomming wars to get them pumped up and leveld up. When you spent a lot more time preparing for a war the mentality will be better and you will want to win more. Negativity needs to be removed from the forums and members need to stop posting demotivating comments such as 'we're going to lose anyways' or things along that line.

Agreed, we should have abnenrs and sigs for every major war.


QUOTE
The council needs to get more involved with the clan members and should become more active and start engaging in IRC conversations as well, some do this yet several are lacking.

Yus, *SLOWLY GLARES AT STOKENUT/LORDY* hash.png.

By Chimpy on 23/02/2010
QUOTE: Quikdrawjoe @ February 23, 2010 04:14 pm)
QUOTE: Chimpy February 23, 2010 09:13 pm
Thank you Joe for yet another useless post hash.png

Thank you for not reading yet another useful post.

You just made stuff green and dleted a few lines.

No honor. hash.png

By Nick on 23/02/2010
When it comes to the events part, I am part to blame at the inactivity that occurs at them. I honestly do not have time to be event active in WG and that is why I previously asked for Emeritus, but I have not been given that. Because of this, I am not going to input my opinion on what happens at events or the attendance of them.

Transparency would be nice. It is something I have advocated since I have been a higher guardian.

Higher requirements are said that they will improve WG. Why not try? I don't mind having the FA requirement actually.

Mandatory war sign ups would also be nice. It would bring people onto the forums. Something that you have to know and do though is make sure that there is a way to keep the PvP events forum clean. I look in it and it gets extremely messy.

By Renegade3540 on 23/02/2010
I forgot to add though that the Important Announcements forum should be used more often not just to advocate your winter awards which could have just been handled without posting in IA except for the winners.

It should be used to advertise actual important stuff regarding events and clan decisions not the winter awards and such.

By Snowzak on 23/02/2010
I agree. But we need a nazi in the council. Which we don't have. Keeping track of attendance is seriously long, boring, monotonous, time-munching. If you don't have at least one person that'll take the time and effort to be the one everybody hates, then it's useless to implement any activity requirements.

By George on 23/02/2010
QUOTE: Renegade3540 @ February 23, 2010 09:37 pm)
I forgot to add though that the Important Announcements forum should be used more often not just to advocate your winter awards which could have just been handled without posting in IA except for the winners.

It should be used to advertise actual important stuff regarding events and clan decisions not the winter awards and such.

You used one example of a post.
I used that forum because it is the only one that I can GUARANTEE my topic will be read.
Not my fault, it's other members who refuse to read forums that aren't classified as "Important".

Chimpy, great suggestions, some of them are being discussed, some could be most helpful.

Apologies, but it is late and so I will read and post in depth tomorrow afternoon, hope that's ok.
(I know you would would prefer a longer and more sincere, in depth reply than a quick post because i'm tired biggrin.gif )

x


By Nick on 23/02/2010
QUOTE: Snowzak @ February 23, 2010 05:15 pm)
I agree. But we need a nazi in the council. Which we don't have.

I said the same thing to Groe last night.

Good to know that my thoughts of the best way to get things done in here, is shared by others.

By George on 23/02/2010
One further thought before I sleep - you want more planned raids? How the hell can we do that when 3 staff have just walked out on us?
Yeah I didn't want to have to say this, but cmon, it's quite frankly a disgrace.

We, as members of WG, need to give the staff support, especially those who are newer to the job and have less experience.

We all need to work together, or NOTHING will get done and WG will remain as it is.... which I think we can all agree would destroy WG as we know it.

By Snowzak on 23/02/2010
QUOTE: George @ February 23, 2010 10:30 pm)
One further thought before I sleep - you want more planned raids? How the hell can we do that when 3 staff have just walked out on us?
Yeah I didn't want to have to say this, but cmon, it's quite frankly a disgrace.

We, as members of WG, need to give the staff support, especially those who are newer to the job and have less experience.

We all need to work together, or NOTHING will get done and WG will remain as it is.... which I think we can all agree would destroy WG as we know it.

Support, yes.
Yes to responsability as well.

Which is the egg, which is the hen, troll it out. But things have to start somewhere, and leaders are leaders because five people are supposed to start shit faster than fifty do.

By DZ on 24/02/2010
Good ideas Chimpy. If we want to do better we're going to have to get more strict. That's just the way it goes.

By 30 Str 0wnz on 24/02/2010
One problem that I see is members will use the Emertius rank to bypass the activity requirement while still coming to the events they want.

Possible option I guess is to limit emertius rights. I know emertius like to cry about this subject, but if they want to play with WG I think they should just join as a member. If they can't keep the activity requirement, than they shouldn't be qualified to fight with WG.

One example of someone who has done this in a way is Kero2, who was never talked to about it, so it is viable and possible.

By Kyle on 24/02/2010
ACTIVITY BY ATTENDANCE PERCENTAGE

Please, and if Joe would like to do the Excel work, I'd be really happy.

SKIPPING

Agreed

HIGHER REQUIREMENTS

Can't do until Lordy okays it, so it's at quite a standstill.

ALL WARS MANDATORY SIGN UPS
Ye that'd be good. neko2.gif

MORE TRANSPARENCY
Okay

WAR BULLETINS TYPE THINGS IDK WHAT TO CALL IT
I don't know HTML, ask Robbie lolz

AUDIO
See above^

By Snowzak on 24/02/2010
Hassle the pandahof, Kyle.

By WG_Keanu on 24/02/2010
QUOTE
ACTIVITY BY ATTENDANCE PERCENTAGE


Agree

QUOTE
if you skip a war or pk, you get 40-60% Warn and a two week suspension.


A war, yes. A raid, leave that at 20% warn.

QUOTE
HIGHER REQUIREMENTS


I still think asking for 3 combat levels in 1 month ALONGSIDE 6m worth of gear plus event attendance and so is asking for too much. Definitely not 5. Unless of course we extend the TG period - that I don't mind so much.

QUOTE
ALL WARS MANDATORY SIGN UPS


Agree

QUOTE
MORE TRANSPARENCY


Strongly agree

QUOTE
WAR BULLETINS TYPE THINGS IDK WHAT TO CALL IT


Yes but don't make them look as horrible as that. But they do work really well.

QUOTE
AUDIO


Mmmrrrrrrrgggghhhhhh I really dunno anymore. I'm gonna stay neutral on this but I don't mind whether we switch to TS3 or keep mumble. I have both and am happy using either.

By Mickey on 24/02/2010
QUOTE
ACTIVITY BY ATTENDANCE PERCENTAGE


Can easily be added the attendance editor.

QUOTE
if you skip a war or pk, you get 40-60% Warn and a two week suspension.


Two week suspension is a tad overboard. I agree with the 40-60% warn though, as long as the prep is over 3 days.

QUOTE
HIGHER REQUIREMENTS


Agreed. WTF @ Keanu. 3 combat levels in one month and 6m of gear? That's a piece of piss. I got well over 5 combat levels in that time and that wasn't even no lifing, that was also before armoured zombies. As for making 6m in a month.. Come on. I've made over 25m in the last week, and that's without godwars/merching

QUOTE
ALL WARS MANDATORY SIGN UPS


Agreed. There's no reason why you shouldn't be able to sign up if there's over 3 days prep, unless of course you have an inactivity post.

QUOTE
MORE TRANSPARENCY


Agreed. I won't go into level 4, but what happens in level 3 isn't as important as it's made out to be.

QUOTE
WAR BULLETINS TYPE THINGS IDK WHAT TO CALL IT


I had an idea for that a while ago, but these forums aren't capable of what I had in mind.

QUOTE
AUDIO


I think everyone already knows my stance on this already.

By WG_Keanu on 24/02/2010
QUOTE
I've made over 25m in the last week, and that's without godwars/merching.


WTFAK TEACH ME

By Evil 9116 on 24/02/2010
Excellent ideas Chimpy. I agree with almost every single one.

QUOTE
if you skip a war or pk, you get 40-60% Warn and a two week suspension.


But I say put that to 20-40%wink.gif 50 or 60% is a little harsh in my opinion.

And Regenade, great suggestions mate.

By Renegade3540 on 24/02/2010
--- Post was made before seeing Gene's topic, kindly ignore it. :< ---



By rachellove9 on 24/02/2010
Did you read the recap of the Mumble Meeting?
http://92.48.69.8/~wgwilde/forum/index.php?showtopic=16389

I do not like the idea of the percentages. Our members over the age of 18, it would be most difficult for them.

Another idea I posted in lvl 4 is this:

QUOTE
I can support increases the number of events per week to attend and keeping the rolling count.  Even if we erase the attendance at the end of each month to "0" roll count and you have to have [set amount] to keep your ranks or membership with the clan.  I can go for that.  We have weeks with tons of events and then others quiet.  If you are doing exams or working you need the flexibility.


Requirement raises are still being discussed. The last time we did this the I think I was a higher guardian at the time. It was such a disappointment to me. I would be in irc and someone new would come in and I'd be the only one to greet them. We had loads of intros and unfriendly members. Gene wasn't there to see how badly some of the clan behaved. Things have gotten better but the porn links and cum in your face talk is not going to help keep intros now either. "That is all."



By His_Lordship on 24/02/2010
IN a nutshell

ACTIVITY BY ATTENDANCE PERCENTAGE
This is Robbie's next project, when he has time of course. I'm totally with you on this. We're recording the percentage over 60 days, perhaps 90. Not decided yet.

SKIPPING
I think if you give 100% to this clan you can afford to skip the occasional raid if you so choose. Loyalty is not measured in attendance.

HIGHER REQUIREMENTS
Lol, just no. We've been over this for three years and every generation makes the same mistake.

ALL WARS MANDATORY SIGN UPS
YES! This is already in place but I would like to emphasise it. I very much agree with you here.

MORE TRANSPARENCY
I suppose we can do this. Right now level 3 and 4 is all talk no walk. We need more action and I'm going to push for that as a high priority. As for members feeling seperate from the council, it is going to help that I am giving all council members tertiary jobs, to get back in touch with the members.

WAR BULLETINS TYPE THINGS IDK WHAT TO CALL IT
We do, but not for every war. Frankly, a war a week is too much anyway. I can't keep that activity up myself so I don't expect it of another member. Wars should be rare treats.

AUDIO
Mumble vs Teamspeak. I'll think about it but I'm not warming up to the idea, simply because Mumble is finally starting to establish itself in WG.


AND DON'T FUCKING IGNORE!!!!
I want to finish by saying your posts in this forum are really rude, and its only because I care so much that I'm bothering with them.
You need to work on your attitude.

By His_Lordship on 24/02/2010
Reposting this for emphasis.
We are not raising our requirements... ever.

I don't care if I'm the last person in WG who wants them the same.
I'm flexible on other matters but never on this.

WG never learns that this does not help us at all.

By WG_Keanu on 24/02/2010
QUOTE: His_Lordship @ February 24, 2010 03:58 pm)
Reposting this for emphasis.
We are not raising our requirements... ever.

user posted image

By His_Lordship on 24/02/2010
Keanu this does not exempt you from training.
In fact I strongly urge you especially to train.

By WG_Keanu on 24/02/2010
Ya I know I was just enjoying the moment tongue.gif I shall continue training of course tongue.gif

By George on 24/02/2010
Gene just wrinsed what I was about to write.... I guess all I can say is "yeah that" to what he said.
All good points, but he has explained the reasons for why we cannot go down SOME of those paths.
Others, as he has already mentioned, are already being addressed - the activity percentage system for one, and the transparency thing.

Edit: To add:
Your suggestion about the war/event bulletin type things.
Do we really need them when we have the EVENT TIMES tab that functions perfectly?
Don't come back and say that members don't use it... they should do. EVERY SINGLE EVENT is put on that tab within 12 hours of it being posted. It doesn't take long to do and the HTML for it is simple.
If you hover over the event, it not only tells you how long it is until the event, but it also tells you the time IN YOUR OWN TIMEZONE = win. Clicking on the description will bring you to the topic.

Typing "!event" in #wg will bring up the next event (straight from the tab)..

So encourage people to use that more. It will really help us.

By Chimpy on 24/02/2010
QUOTE
SKIPPING
I think if you give 100% to this clan you can afford to skip the occasional raid if you so choose. Loyalty is not measured in attendance.

Have to disagree. Attendance is what is killing our clan. Skipping is lowering our attendance, thus hurting the clan. People that skip usually aren't doing anything better. Maybe loyalty isn't measured in attendance, but you're hurting your clan by not attending.

Also who determines if the person has put in enough work? Leaves ALOT of room for bias.

QUOTE
HIGHER REQUIREMENTS
Lol, just no. We've been over this for three years and every generation makes the same mistake.

Wrong.

Last time we tried this, we had our by far biggest influx of intros in my time in WG, at one point 2-3 A DAY. But nobody worked hard to get these people in, so many didn't really join because they felt detached. On the side, our avg went up and we were winning more. However we weren't getting new members at a satisfactory pace, so you came in and made one of your "I told you I was right you were wrong" speeches and now here we are, no better off. Matter of fact, worse off. I really hope you don't think 100+ has been working out better for us, we've only gained a few members more because of it, half being inactive.

I'm sorry to say lordy, but this isn't 2006 or 2007 anymore. The times are changing, higher levels ARE needed to be better now, that's just the way it is. I would know, frankly you wouldn't. I'm not trying to be rude at all, I have a TON of respect for you, but you don't have a grasp at all of the current clan world. It's the strongest survive now, adapt or die.

As much as I'd like to have lower reqs, we just can't afford it at the moment, not with the current clan situation.

QUOTE

WAR BULLETINS TYPE THINGS IDK WHAT TO CALL IT
We do, but not for every war. Frankly, a war a week is too much anyway. I can't keep that activity up myself so I don't expect it of another member. Wars should be rare treats.

Again, members that like wars and pking (which at this point is most of us), are being starved of what they like, wars. They might be rare treats to you, but to us we thirst for them, and we expect them.


QUOTE
AUDIO
Mumble vs Teamspeak. I'll think about it but I'm not warming up to the idea, simply because Mumble is finally starting to establish itself in WG.

Not really, most people hate it, we just use it because we have to.


QUOTE
AND DON'T FUCKING IGNORE!!!!
I want to finish by saying your posts in this forum are really rude, and its only because I care so much that I'm bothering with them.
You need to work on your attitude.

Sorry if I came across rude, posting things in here has gotten beyond pointless recently because in my last few topics it was rare that a council person even bothered to post at all.

By Snowzak on 24/02/2010
QUOTE: His_Lordship @ February 24, 2010 03:58 pm)
Reposting this for emphasis.
We are not raising our requirements... ever.

I don't care if I'm the last person in WG who wants them the same.
I'm flexible on other matters but never on this.

WG never learns that this does not help us at all.

How does NOT raising them help us?

Right, I guess they're one more D skirt loot for our opponents in the P2P wars we'll have once a month. Kewl.

Have you ever been wrong Gene? O wait, you can't. Sorry for forgetting that basic rule.

By mtoise on 24/02/2010
I think I love Snowzak

By Onathe on 24/02/2010
Gotta adapt to the new clan world and step out the dark ages Gene. Times are changing and we need to learn ourselves that raising requirements do not work.

By WG_Keanu on 25/02/2010
QUOTE: Chimpy @ February 24, 2010 08:36 pm)
QUOTE
SKIPPING
I think if you give 100% to this clan you can afford to skip the occasional raid if you so choose. Loyalty is not measured in attendance.

Have to disagree. Attendance is what is killing our clan. Skipping is lowering our attendance, thus hurting the clan. People that skip usually aren't doing anything better. Maybe loyalty isn't measured in attendance, but you're hurting your clan by not attending.

It comes down to the basic underlying rule that raids and wars should be events that people WANT to come to, and are not forced to come to. Then we get into a whole debate about why are you in this clan and you're not supporting us progressing and that shit. Still not found a viable solution.

By His_Lordship on 25/02/2010
I don't give a flying fuck about adaptation.
There will not be a requirement change no matter what logic you throw at me.
Accuse me of suffocating WG. I won't care.

I'm perfectly capable of being wrong Zach but right now you are the one strutting around like you know best. The attitude you accuse me of having.. well... lol.

We've tried the whole req raise thing. And how you can bother looking at our levels when we have numbers and organisation to worry about... pfft.

By Chimpy on 25/02/2010
QUOTE: His_Lordship @ February 24, 2010 07:19 pm)
I don't give a flying fuck about adaptation.
There will not be a requirement change no matter what logic you throw at me.
Accuse me of suffocating WG. I won't care.

I'm perfectly capable of being wrong Zach but right now you are the one strutting around like you know best. The attitude you accuse me of having.. well... lol.

We've tried the whole req raise thing. And how you can bother looking at our levels when we have numbers and organisation to worry about... pfft.

You're always going to want quantity, but you need quality first to bring in the members.

You don't give a flying fuck about adaptation? That's really sad. Seeing as your whole council, and 95% of the whole clan want to or are atleast willing to try to raise the requirements. You're just to stubborn to do it, nobody is going to care if you're wrong.

Most clans we fight nowadays have far, FAR better stats than we do, and that's why we keep on losing. It's not our fault, it's just statistics, someone with 5x the experience and 15-20 more levels is simply going to tank longer, hit higher, hit more often, hit more successful binds, yadda yadda yadda. This clan isn't attractive whatsoever to experienced, high level players. I don't blame them for not joining honestly.

Zach and me are "strutting around pretending like we know everything" because we DO know better and more about the current clan scene than you do. That's a fact.

You're going to kill this damn clan by being a damn nazi. 95% of the clan wants higher reqs, or to do the things you don't want to. If you deny us what we want, we will and most certainly can find it elsewhere.





By Snowzak on 25/02/2010
QUOTE: Gene)
I'm perfectly capable of being wrong Zach but right now you are the one strutting around like you know best. The attitude you accuse me of having.. well... lol.


Hey, you started the "WG is ALWAYS wrong and ALWAYS has been, I'm right and ALWAYS have been" thing. I just started the "I'm right you're wrong this time in particular" thing.

Struttin' since 05.

By Jayson on 25/02/2010
QUOTE: WG_Keanu @ February 25, 2010 03:26 am)
Ya I know I was just enjoying the moment tongue.gif I shall continue training of course tongue.gif

you have started training?

you have gotten 3 combat levels since you joined on October 16th.

That is 5 months, 10 days.

Or 163 days.

you say you are deticated to WG, yet you show very little detication to training for WG.

By sgtswordfish on 25/02/2010
QUOTE: Jayson @ February 25, 2010 01:26 am)
QUOTE: WG_Keanu February 25, 2010 03:26 am
Ya I know I was just enjoying the moment tongue.gif I shall continue training of course tongue.gif

you have started training?

you have gotten 3 combat levels since you joined on October 16th.

That is 5 months, 10 days.

Or 163 days.

you say you are deticated to WG, yet you show very little detication to training for WG.

he did train his account from scratch to join wg
^

in any case. not everyone will give their all.

By Jayson on 25/02/2010
QUOTE: sgtswordfish @ February 25, 2010 05:40 pm)
QUOTE: Jayson February 25, 2010 01:26 am
       
QUOTE: WG_Keanu  February 25, 2010 03:26 am
Ya I know I was just enjoying the moment tongue.gif I shall continue training of course tongue.gif

you have started training?

you have gotten 3 combat levels since you joined on October 16th.

That is 5 months, 10 days.

Or 163 days.

you say you are deticated to WG, yet you show very little detication to training for WG.

he did train his account from scratch to join wg
^

in any case. not everyone will give their all.

yes, he has a lvl 100 account, but he decided to train an account from scratch to join WG and be the first WG member with WG in their name. whoops, display name change update

By WG_Keanu on 25/02/2010
Hurr durr another debate about me neko2.gif

QUOTE
he decided to train an account from scratch to join WG and be the first WG member with WG in their name.


Incorrect, sir. Having WG in my name was the last reason I started a new account. I'm not focusing on getting combat levels right now. My primary goal right now is to get to a decent level in terms of gear and supplies, then do some questing so I can have access to things like ancients and curses, and skilling of course. After that, then I will focus on max melee or whatever it is you guys want.

Anyway, back on topic. I have always stuck by the policy that if a clan's in a low state, raising the requirements is the last thing we'd want to do.

Say we raised to 110. Yes, we'd be getting better members in, but with the state of our pulls and our recent war record, how many 110+ clanless will actually want to join WG? And we'd be dead in the water in terms of fights. We find it difficult to have a fair chance against 100+ clans nowadays and putting us up to 110 would put us alongside clans like VR and DF. Think we could challenge them at any point? I doubt. A requirement raise will only really give a false representation.

I agree with Gene when I say mass-recruitment is the way to go. I estimate that most people join the clan world around level 70-80, and by the time they hit 100 they have a basic understanding of how the clan world works and knowledge and experience on the battlefield. They may not have 99 defence or 100 rune sets but they can hold their own on the front lines. If we got 10-20 active 100-110s into WG, they might not be pros but our turnouts would steadily increase, event popularity would rise, and more activity means we start outpulling to wars, end our losing streak and get back on course. THEN we can start thinking about our next move.

Always think one step ahead- not two. We're in a slump, and our priority is to get out of it. A requirement raise would be throwing ourselves ahead and it could very well kill us if it doesn't work. From what Gene's said, we've tried it before and it hasn't, so we shouldn't keep making the same mistakes. Mass recruitment is an open door that we haven't tried yet. I'm willing to bet it works for us if we advocate it.

By Snowzak on 25/02/2010
We've also never tried raising them and keeping them there... mass recruiting the is the solution that's been used every time, it's not the other way around.

Mass recruiting is the reason people have used this clan for so many years as a stepping stone to get into other higher leveled clan. Easy to get in, acceptable training for top clans, but unable to maintain a high standard so off they go.

By WG_Keanu on 25/02/2010
http://92.48.69.8/~wgwilde/forum/index.php?showtopic=11819

Last time we raised for 2 months recruitment halved. I don't see the logic in keeping the reqs raised, because how could things possibly improve? We'd have less choice of members, we'd have harder opponents to fight... \_O.o_/

By Chimpy on 25/02/2010
QUOTE: WG_Keanu @ February 25, 2010 06:21 am)
http://92.48.69.8/~wgwilde/forum/index.php?showtopic=11819

Last time we raised for 2 months recruitment halved. I don't see the logic in keeping the reqs raised, because how could things possibly improve? We'd have less choice of members, we'd have harder opponents to fight... \_O.o_/

QUOTE: Myself on Page 2)
Last time we tried this, we had our by far biggest influx of intros in my time in WG, at one point 2-3 A DAY. But nobody worked hard to get these people in, so many didn't really join because they felt detached. On the side, our avg went up and we were winning more. However we weren't getting new members at a satisfactory pace, so you came in and made one of your "I told you I was right you were wrong" speeches and now here we are, no better off. Matter of fact, worse off. I really hope you don't think 100+ has been working out better for us, we've only gained a few members more because of it, half being inactive.

I'm sorry to say lordy, but this isn't 2006 or 2007 anymore. The times are changing, higher levels ARE needed to be better now, that's just the way it is. I would know, frankly you wouldn't. I'm not trying to be rude at all, I have a TON of respect for you, but you don't have a grasp at all of the current clan world. It's the strongest survive now, adapt or die.

As much as I'd like to have lower reqs, we just can't afford it at the moment, not with the current clan situation.


Yeah, 2 months. We didn't even try. We had our biggest influx of intros that I've ever seen then too. It definatly was not a failure. Lordy just refused to ride it out.

And how does raising reqs to 110+ put us on DF/Vr's level? Lol? I can rattle off 15 clans easily that we can still fight with those reqs that aren't top clans.

By WG_Keanu on 25/02/2010
QUOTE: Chimpy @ February 25, 2010 12:06 pm)
And how does raising reqs to 110+ put us on DF/Vr's level? Lol? I can rattle off 15 clans easily that we can still fight with those reqs that aren't top clans.

If we can easily fight 15 clans at the 110+ level why have we lost the past 15 fights with clans at the 100+ level?

QUOTE
Lordy just refused to ride it out.


Not really. We all refused to ride it out, hence 36 out of 52 votes to put the reqs back down. Can't blame that on Gene.

By His_Lordship on 25/02/2010
QUOTE: Snowzak @ February 25, 2010 01:54 am)
Struttin' since 05.

Struttin' since 03.

PS Chimpy - I'm still not going to change reqs, so write another essay and I'll reply with another 2 lines. It's still a resounding no. I might consider your other ideas.

By Chimpy on 25/02/2010
QUOTE: His_Lordship @ February 25, 2010 10:12 am)
QUOTE: Snowzak February 25, 2010 01:54 am
Struttin' since 05.

Struttin' since 03.

PS Chimpy - I'm still not going to change reqs, so write another essay and I'll reply with another 2 lines. It's still a resounding no. I might consider your other ideas.

Sad that you could give a shit what your clan wants you just want what you want.

By Chimpy on 25/02/2010
QUOTE: WG_Keanu @ February 25, 2010 07:15 am)
QUOTE: Chimpy February 25, 2010 12:06 pm
And how does raising reqs to 110+ put us on DF/Vr's level? Lol?  I can rattle off 15 clans easily that we can still fight with those reqs that aren't top clans.

If we can easily fight 15 clans at the 110+ level why have we lost the past 15 fights with clans at the 100+ level?

wat. We fought like 1, MAYBE 2 clnas with 100+ reqs lately. Rest have been 105-110+, and it makes a big difference.

QUOTE
Lordy just refused to ride it out.


Not really. We all refused to ride it out, hence 36 out of 52 votes to put the reqs back down. Can't blame that on Gene.

Yeah, it was a group failure.

Lordy it's sad you could give a shit what everyone else in your clan wants you only care about what you want. Stuff like that nearly killed the clan before and will most likely do it again.

By sgtswordfish on 25/02/2010
his lordship is wg leader

if he chooses it thus he can kill the clan on the spot. don't test the powers that be.

your resolve is weakened by your inability to accept and trust. you say you're committed to wg yet you won't stand by your leader? you provide ideas to "fix" when your current task is of much greater importance.






By Chimpy on 25/02/2010
QUOTE: sgtswordfish @ February 25, 2010 11:06 am)
his lordship is wg leader

if he chooses it thus he can kill the clan on the spot. don't test the powers that be.

your resolve is weakened by your inability to accept and trust. you say you're committed to wg yet you won't stand by your leader? you provide ideas to "fix" when your current task is of much greater importance.

I really wish I could ever make out what you're saying.

It's not that I don't trust lordy or aren't willing to be under him. I have, do, and always will respect him. Just because we have a disagreement doesn't mean whatever you wrote. I'm sorry I'm not a spineless underlying that follows whatever the leadership tells me to do. I'm allowed to disagree, and I am.

QUOTE
you provide ideas to "fix" when your current task is of much greater importance.

What is my current task supposed to be? >_>

By WG_Keanu on 25/02/2010
QUOTE: Chimpy @ February 25, 2010 05:04 pm)
QUOTE
you provide ideas to "fix" when your current task is of much greater importance.

What is my current task supposed to be? >_>

MASS RECRUIT biggrin.gif

QUOTE: WG_Keanu February 25, 2010 07:15 am
       
QUOTE: Chimpy  February 25, 2010 12:06 pm
And how does raising reqs to 110+ put us on DF/Vr's level? Lol?  I can rattle off 15 clans easily that we can still fight with those reqs that aren't top clans.

If we can easily fight 15 clans at the 110+ level why have we lost the past 15 fights with clans at the 100+ level?

wat. We fought like 1, MAYBE 2 clnas with 100+ reqs lately. Rest have been 105-110+, and it makes a big difference.


Well you just proved my point :S

QUOTE
       
QUOTE
Lordy just refused to ride it out.


Not really. We all refused to ride it out, hence 36 out of 52 votes to put the reqs back down. Can't blame that on Gene.

Yeah, it was a group failure.


And who's to say it won't be another group failure if we raise again?

1. Don't raise. Mass recruit 100+. Keep fighting 100+ clans, start winning. Better turnouts and progression faster. Ability moderate, improves over time.

2. Raise. Try and recruit 110+ or whatever (harder). Start fighting 110+ clans, keep losing. Turnouts and ability improves but slowly. Progression a lot slower.

Between those 2 options, #1 is the one that doesn't put both clan and leadership under a lot of pressure and is least likely to fail.

By Quikdrawjoe on 25/02/2010
You say we make the same mistake of raising requirements yet not raising them has never worked either.
We still end up in the same cycle, yet raising reqs is the same mistake every time?

By Chimpy on 25/02/2010
QUOTE: Quikdrawjoe @ February 25, 2010 01:24 pm)
You say we make the same mistake of raising requirements yet not raising them has never worked either.
We still end up in the same cycle, yet raising reqs is the same mistake every time?

This.

"Mass Recruiting" has never worked, and won't ever work.

Here's how our "recruiting" works.

We go onto a "looking for clan" topic, and post. The person looking for a pking clan see's wg, where warring is a "rare treat", and then they see DF, TRWF, VR, etc; where pking/warring happens 3-5 days a week and they are successful. Who do you think they're going to chose.

If you haven't noticed, the stricter clans are the more successful clans. We say we want to be a fun clan, but are we REALLY having fun? Attendance + levels + experience = success and that my friends, is fun.

Win topics brings in recruits, sorry to say but the recruitment team is practically useless.

We can still have a 100+ req for FA or trial and still have a higher req for full member.


Joe is right here. I think we are stuck in the cycle of lowering reqs, not of raising them.

By Renegade3540 on 25/02/2010
Raising the requirements at the current time will only result in more failure.

Raising the requirements during a time in which we prosper will help improve the clan performance.

I'll put it shortly: Raising the requirements now is a mistake and will only result in nothing being achieved. Raising the requirements when we've already gotten a couple of wins behind our belts will improve the prosperity. The last time the Requirements were raised under circumstances where WG was prospering was after OPH and we never had the chance to see how that evolved because of you Eugene.

Requirements in the current picture are petty and insignificant. You can throw 30 inexperienced and demoralised level 100s-126s at another clan or you can throws 30 inexperienced and demoralised 110-126s at the same clan and you will achieve the same results.

What is making WG lose is not the low levels, what is making us lose is negativity, morale and the unwillingness to win that comes with it. Claiming that you could solve everything by something so passive and long term as a requirements raise is ignorance at it's best.

Just because you will raise the requirements it won't make a clan that hasn't won a war in the past 3 months anymore attractive.

YOU start training up for wars. YOU start pumping members up. YOU start looking at your performance and how you can improve. YOU start acting as a guardian. Instead of complaining and pointing out what everybody else is doing wrong you should be looking for ways on how to help those members and you should be looking for ways to also improve on what you're doing wrong.

Winning a war is done through the effort of a clan, not through the effort of a few individuals.

As for you Eugene, I've known you for ages but maybe you haven't known me for so long. I was there during D-Day and I was in your IRC channel talking with you. I know that you are far from an unreasonable person and I know that ego of yours is part of the clan. But you too should realise, even more so after the events back then. That the clan isn't just you. It is everybody who's willing to adapt, change and add another stone to the house, no the monument, that is WG.

By Chimpy on 25/02/2010
QUOTE: Renegade3540 @ February 25, 2010 02:40 pm)
Raising the requirements at the current time will only result in more failure.

Raising the requirements during a time in which we prosper will help improve the clan performance.

I'll put it shortly: Raising the requirements now is a mistake and will only result in nothing being achieved. Raising the requirements when we've already gotten a couple of wins behind our belts will improve the prosperity. The last time the Requirements were raised under circumstances where WG was prospering was after OPH and we never had the chance to see how that evolved because of you Eugene.

Requirements in the current picture are petty and insignificant. You can throw 30 inexperienced and demoralised level 100s-126s at another clan or you can throws 30 inexperienced and demoralised 110-126s at the same clan and you will achieve the same results.

What is making WG lose is not the low levels, what is making us lose is negativity, morale and the unwillingness to win that comes with it. Claiming that you could solve everything by something so passive and long term as a requirements raise is ignorance at it's best.

Just because you will raise the requirements it won't make a clan that hasn't won a war in the past 3 months anymore attractive.

YOU start training up for wars. YOU start pumping members up. YOU start looking at your performance and how you can improve. YOU start acting as a guardian. Instead of complaining and pointing out what everybody else is doing wrong you should be looking for ways on how to help those members and you should be looking for ways to also improve on what you're doing wrong.

Winning a war is done through the effort of a clan, not through the effort of a few individuals.

As for you Eugene, I've known you for ages but maybe you haven't known me for so long. I was there during D-Day and I was in your IRC channel talking with you. I know that you are far from an unreasonable person and I know that ego of yours is part of the clan. But you too should realise, even more so after the events back then. That the clan isn't just you. It is everybody who's willing to adapt, change and add another stone to the house, no the monument, that is WG.

I don't think that raising reqs will instantly make us win wars. I think it is just simply a piece to the puzzle.

By Bobster125 on 26/02/2010
Chimp, it doesn't look like we're going to get anywhere with this, the only person who can change this is Eugene, he's clearly and bluntly stated he ain't ever going to do it. So god knows where that leaves members who are success hungry.

By His_Lordship on 26/02/2010
I'm prepared to make compromises around req changes, such and forcing training amoung lower levels. But when I founded WG I had some principles to live by and the req raise is in conflict with some of my principles.

I'm sorry for coming across as so defensive, but it's not within my moral code for WG to raise requirements. I want success and I'll listen to your ideas. You had some very good ones which I know I will consider STRONGLY. Requirements are just a flat out no. Now let's find a solution around them.

Mass recruiting has not worked because we've not done it properly yet. As of this weekend (my first free weekend in a month for WG), I will set it in motion and I have a few things to do:

1. Set up the anniversary
2. Fix the clan forums
3. Prep for the war, and attend it
4. Work hard with Darth on recruitment
5. Put our new Flash on Newgrounds
6. Reset the bans
7. Speak to David about personal trainers
8. Personal stuff with George
9. Lead the Aussie raid

__________

That's all I'll be able to handle in one weekend, but I hope that's enough to show you I'm following up on my promise to revive this clan.

We're all really frustrated becasue since the great war, nothing has happened.
Please remember I was overseas for three weeks and this is my first week back, and it was 90% occupied with Machinima.
Now that Macvhinima is out of focus, I have that time and energy to give to you guys.

So it's about to get a whole lot better. Think of that week leading up to the great war and how worked up WG got.

It's going to be like that again.

By sgtswordfish on 26/02/2010
it shall be done!



By Stokenut on 26/02/2010
Sweet, saved myself like an hours reading by missing this topic.
But seriously, yes I agree with more or less everything you said in your post Chimpy.

I'll read it and the replies in detail tomorrow when I wake up.

Fitting 8 hours of RS and 10 hours of WoW into each day is tough, but I'm managing!

By Chimpy on 26/02/2010
QUOTE: Stokenut February 25, 2010 08:38 pm
Sweet, saved myself like an hours reading by missing this topic.
But seriously, yes I agree with more or less everything you said in your post Chimpy.

I'll read it and the replies in detail tomorrow when I wake up.

Fitting 8 hours of RS and 10 hours of WoW into each day is tough, but I'm managing!

No time for fap?

Well thank you loads for doin something Gene. I would REALLY like to see reqs raised, because like you said about mass recruiting, I don't think that higher reqs have ever been given a fair chance. Hopefully we can continue to debate this.

Also:
QUOTE
8. Personal stuff with George

Do I want to know? o.o

By sgtswordfish on 26/02/2010
^above post is a major FML

mistaken stokenut for gene?

By Quikdrawjoe on 26/02/2010
QUOTE: Chimpy @ February 26, 2010 01:44 am)
QUOTE: Stokenut February 25, 2010 08:38 pm
Sweet, saved myself like an hours reading by missing this topic.
But seriously, yes I agree with more or less everything you said in your post Chimpy.

I'll read it and the replies in detail tomorrow when I wake up.

Fitting 8 hours of RS and 10 hours of WoW into each day is tough, but I'm managing!

No time for fap?

Well thank you loads for doin something Gene. I would REALLY like to see reqs raised, because like you said about mass recruiting, I don't think that higher reqs have ever been given a fair chance. Hopefully we can continue to debate this.

Also:
QUOTE
8. Personal stuff with George

Do I want to know? o.o

He does that during the 18 hours.

We ideally have numbers, organization, and levels. Currently, we lack all three, without those three our only hope every winning is that the opponent is so below us in those things that they're even worse than us.

By WG_Keanu on 26/02/2010
QUOTE
8. Personal stuff with George


O_o

I agree with Rene I think. Thanks for clearing that up Gene.



Back to Topic Index

Developed by Mojo.