Back to Topic Index

Does WG AntiRpk

By His_Lordship on 12/06/2010
Does WG anti-RPK?

Click HERE to find out.

By His_Lordship on 12/06/2010
The antiRPKing code it written in the clan rules:
http://www.wildernessguardians.com/forum/i...showtopic=13492

It's in the code of honour section.
As part of the application process, you were required to read our rules.
One member was just caught killing a bandits trainer in a PVP world.
The member is suspended for 3 days.
It will lead to expulsion if that member does it again.

Guys, it is our belief, as a clan, that honour needs to be preserved.
We're one of the last clans faithful to honour, and we can't let it slip.

By Reticked on 12/06/2010
antirpking is all i knowww

By George on 12/06/2010
Glad I found it by mistake lol.

By Dallar on 12/06/2010
I don't think many people take their time to read our rules tbh..

By His_Lordship on 12/06/2010
If they did, I wouldn't have to post this.
But they did agree to them on application, so we leaders assume they've read them.
Their fault if they didn't.

By WG_Keanu on 12/06/2010
I'll wait for the code of honour to be updated. In any case, I only ever attack people who I consider a threat to myself or others who are not threats themselves.

By sgtswordfish on 12/06/2010
it's sad he got suspended



By WG_Keanu on 12/06/2010
QUOTE: sgtswordfish @ June 12, 2010 03:13 pm)
it's sad he got suspended

no it's not

By Eregion2 on 12/06/2010
We care about this again? Yay!

By Quikdrawjoe on 12/06/2010
Who got suspended? lol

By Nick on 12/06/2010
Okay. I will just follow what the leaders say on raids because I never solo PK.

By Ubg-Fcbruges on 12/06/2010
Well deserved! mwuahaha

By Indivi2you on 12/06/2010
Yeah, who?

By Eregion2 on 12/06/2010
If the who was important I'm sure Eugene would have mentioned it.

By ImBryanMan on 12/06/2010
I can really appreciate the integrity here, but I have to be honest I totally disagree, its not 2006 anymore the game has changed dynamically. Used to be you HAD to go in the wilderness to kill green dragons, finish some clue scrolls, maybe even mine rune ore. Nowadays this all can be done relatively safely in the wild. You now have the option of CHOOSING to go to a dangerous world, and more often than not that choice is made so the player can gain ep. For that reward they run the risk of being attacked, basically all fair game. Now that I am thinking about it this is so hypocritical, every trip I have ever been on with wg, we have attacked any white dot that we come across, except for an obvious skiller who is using brawling gloves (as they are not there for ep but bc it is the only place they can use brawlers). But according to the oldschool ARpking rules, if that player didnt attack us we shouldnt attack them right?(correct me if Im wrong) All Im trying to say is that in my opinion it is nh to ddos, crash planned fights,1 item, but not to kill a player that intentionally went to a pvp world for their own gain. Im sure a lot of the nostalgic old school members will disagree with me, but opinions are like assholes, we all have one.

With that being said and to keep things fair I am requesting to be suspended as well. Yesterday I killed a guy that was inside bh crater killing greaters. He wasnt wearing brawlers and didnt have any real expensive gear on just rune, but he was there to kill greaters and gain ep.

By ZurvivorMan on 12/06/2010
yeahthat.gif

By WG_Keanu on 13/06/2010
QUOTE: Quikdrawjoe @ June 12, 2010 04:58 pm)
Who got suspended? lol

Could you honestly just not post if you have no idea what you're talking about? If you're going to post either have some idea AND/OR do some research. Your ignorance is appalling, instead of using a brain which it appears you lack instead you make some inane post that I have to reply to so that everyone doesn't actually listen to the load of drivel you posted here.

By Rodney75 on 13/06/2010
QUOTE: ImBryanMan June 12, 2010 05:16 pm
I can really appreciate the integrity here, but I have to be honest I totally disagree, its not 2006 anymore the game has changed dynamically. Used to be you HAD to go in the wilderness to kill green dragons, finish some clue scrolls, maybe even mine rune ore. Nowadays this all can be done relatively safely in the wild. You now have the option of CHOOSING to go to a dangerous world, and more often than not that choice is made so the player can gain ep. For that reward they run the risk of being attacked, basically all fair game. Now that I am thinking about it this is so hypocritical, every trip I have ever been on with wg, we have attacked any white dot that we come across, except for an obvious skiller who is using brawling gloves (as they are not there for ep but bc it is the only place they can use brawlers). But according to the oldschool ARpking rules, if that player didnt attack us we shouldnt attack them right?(correct me if Im wrong) All Im trying to say is that in my opinion it is nh to ddos, crash planned fights,1 item, but not to kill a player that intentionally went to a pvp world for their own gain. Im sure a lot of the nostalgic old school members will disagree with me, but opinions are like assholes, we all have one.

Sensible - and agree.

But it's in the clan rules which I agreed - so I wouldn't do it (plus - don't solo pk and daydream when I pk with clan).

EDIT: My Bad Keanu stupid.gif

By WG_Keanu on 13/06/2010
QUOTE: Rodney75 @ June 13, 2010 01:28 am)
Keanu. Where have your manners gone? This is offensive and I am very suprised this came from you.

PM'ed.

By Kung Man149 on 13/06/2010
I find this post to be insanely stupid because we've all killed skiller's at some point.
Hell I've even killed a few in my time so does that mean i should be suspended as well?

I'm just saying this post is over the top.

By WG_Keanu on 13/06/2010
QUOTE: Kung Man149 @ June 13, 2010 01:43 am)
Hell I've even killed a few in my time so does that mean i should be suspended as well?

It's not just about him RPKing. You gotta look at the bigger picture.

By Kung Man149 on 13/06/2010
QUOTE: WG_Keanu @ June 12, 2010 07:50 pm)
QUOTE: Kung Man149 June 13, 2010 01:43 am
Hell I've even killed a few in my time so does that mean i should be suspended as well?

It's not just about him RPKing. You gotta look at the bigger picture.

Either way this is friggin' stupid.

By Quikdrawjoe on 13/06/2010
QUOTE: WG_Keanu @ June 13, 2010 12:23 am)
QUOTE: Quikdrawjoe June 12, 2010 04:58 pm
Who got suspended? lol

Could you honestly just not post if you have no idea what you're talking about? If you're going to post either have some idea AND/OR do some research. Your ignorance is appalling, instead of using a brain which it appears you lack instead you make some inane post that I have to reply to so that everyone doesn't actually listen to the load of drivel you posted here.

Your e-rage is really quite amusing. I also don't have access to level 4 but if you can get me that I'd appreciate it.

By Jayson on 13/06/2010
QUOTE: Quikdrawjoe @ June 13, 2010 01:17 pm)
QUOTE: WG_Keanu June 13, 2010 12:23 am
       
QUOTE: Quikdrawjoe  June 12, 2010 04:58 pm
Who got suspended? lol

Could you honestly just not post if you have no idea what you're talking about? If you're going to post either have some idea AND/OR do some research. Your ignorance is appalling, instead of using a brain which it appears you lack instead you make some inane post that I have to reply to so that everyone doesn't actually listen to the load of drivel you posted here.

Your e-rage is really quite amusing. I also don't have access to level 4 but if you can get me that I'd appreciate it.

joe has a point keanu, he just asked a simple question. i didn't relise your race also for biggest e-penis by posting as much as you can makes joe's post count a threat to you.

and what is he meant to post? this isn't a discussion thread, it is a post to let everyone know that the rule is still in place, and the only posts i see are you. you posted "Pm'ed", and as you would put it "you make some inane post that I have to reply to so that everyone doesn't actually listen to the load of drivel you posted here."

By Eregion2 on 13/06/2010
QUOTE: ImBryanMan June 12, 2010 05:16 pm
I can really appreciate the integrity here, but I have to be honest I totally disagree, its not 2006 anymore the game has changed dynamically. Used to be you HAD to go in the wilderness to kill green dragons, finish some clue scrolls, maybe even mine rune ore. Nowadays this all can be done relatively safely in the wild. You now have the option of CHOOSING to go to a dangerous world, and more often than not that choice is made so the player can gain ep. For that reward they run the risk of being attacked, basically all fair game. Now that I am thinking about it this is so hypocritical, every trip I have ever been on with wg, we have attacked any white dot that we come across, except for an obvious skiller who is using brawling gloves (as they are not there for ep but bc it is the only place they can use brawlers). But according to the oldschool ARpking rules, if that player didnt attack us we shouldnt attack them right?(correct me if Im wrong) All Im trying to say is that in my opinion it is nh to ddos, crash planned fights,1 item, but not to kill a player that intentionally went to a pvp world for their own gain. Im sure a lot of the nostalgic old school members will disagree with me, but opinions are like assholes, we all have one.

That's not what AntiRpking is. It is what most people think it is though, which is why we have so much trouble enforcing it. AntiRpking isn't some rigid code of rights and wrongs that you just do, at it's baseline it's Pk'ing ETHICALLY. Regardless of how the game evolves that will never go away. There will still be ethical decisions to be made, it's not just about whether or not we kill skillers. A huge part of it is if a WG raid of 50-75 people (yeah) runs into a lower level group of 3 PK'ers barely into the 100s who are out to have some fun. Is it ETHICAL for us to kill them? I doubt it.

There are risks to being in a PK'ing world. AntiRpking says that regardless of those risks, we still shouldn't act like dicks "because they knew the risks beforehand." It's about ethics, fairness, and being a decent person.
QUOTE
With that being said and to keep things fair I am requesting to be suspended as well. Yesterday I killed a guy that was inside bh crater killing greaters. He wasnt wearing brawlers and didnt have any real expensive gear on just rune, but he was there to kill greaters and gain ep.
And you should be. But you get points from me for being honest.
QUOTE: "Kung Man149")
I find this post to be insanely stupid because we've all killed skiller's at some point.
Hell I've even killed a few in my time so does that mean i should be suspended as well?

I'm just saying this post is over the top.
I never have since joining WG. I can honestly testify to that.

By WG_Keanu on 13/06/2010
QUOTE
A huge part of it is if a WG raid of 50-75 people (yeah) runs into a lower level group of 3 PK'ers barely into the 100s who are out to have some fun. Is it ETHICAL for us to kill them? I doubt it.


That's an interesting point. Right now, we would, without a second thought.

By Kiwi011 on 13/06/2010
QUOTE: Eregion2 @ June 13, 2010 08:13 pm)
QUOTE: ImBryanMan June 12, 2010 05:16 pm
I can really appreciate the integrity here, but I have to be honest I totally disagree, its not 2006 anymore the game has changed dynamically. Used to be you HAD to go in the wilderness to kill green dragons, finish some clue scrolls, maybe even mine rune ore. Nowadays this all can be done relatively safely in the wild. You now have the option of CHOOSING to go to a dangerous world, and more often than not that choice is made so the player can gain ep. For that reward they run the risk of being attacked, basically all fair game. Now that I am thinking about it this is so hypocritical, every trip I have ever been on with wg, we have attacked any white dot that we come across, except for an obvious skiller who is using brawling gloves (as they are not there for ep but bc it is the only place they can use brawlers). But according to the oldschool ARpking rules, if that player didnt attack us we shouldnt attack them right?(correct me if Im wrong) All Im trying to say is that in my opinion it is nh to ddos, crash planned fights,1 item, but not to kill a player that intentionally went to a pvp world for their own gain. Im sure a lot of the nostalgic old school members will disagree with me, but opinions are like assholes, we all have one.

That's not what AntiRpking is. It is what most people think it is though, which is why we have so much trouble enforcing it. AntiRpking isn't some rigid code of rights and wrongs that you just do, at it's baseline it's Pk'ing ETHICALLY. Regardless of how the game evolves that will never go away. There will still be ethical decisions to be made, it's not just about whether or not we kill skillers. A huge part of it is if a WG raid of 50-75 people (yeah) runs into a lower level group of 3 PK'ers barely into the 100s who are out to have some fun. Is it ETHICAL for us to kill them? I doubt it.

There are risks to being in a PK'ing world. AntiRpking says that regardless of those risks, we still shouldn't act like dicks "because they knew the risks beforehand." It's about ethics, fairness, and being a decent person.
QUOTE
With that being said and to keep things fair I am requesting to be suspended as well. Yesterday I killed a guy that was inside bh crater killing greaters. He wasnt wearing brawlers and didnt have any real expensive gear on just rune, but he was there to kill greaters and gain ep.
And you should be. But you get points from me for being honest.
QUOTE: "Kung Man149")
I find this post to be insanely stupid because we've all killed skiller's at some point.
Hell I've even killed a few in my time so does that mean i should be suspended as well?

I'm just saying this post is over the top.
I never have since joining WG. I can honestly testify to that.

yea pretty much agree with this guy......

haven't killed a skiller since I joined wg.

By Jayson on 13/06/2010
QUOTE: Kiwi011 @ June 14, 2010 07:50 am)
QUOTE: Eregion2 June 13, 2010 08:13 pm
       
QUOTE: ImBryanMan  June 12, 2010 05:16 pm
I can really appreciate the integrity here, but I have to be honest I totally disagree, its not 2006 anymore the game has changed dynamically. Used to be you HAD to go in the wilderness to kill green dragons, finish some clue scrolls, maybe even mine rune ore. Nowadays this all can be done relatively safely in the wild. You now have the option of CHOOSING to go to a dangerous world, and more often than not that choice is made so the player can gain ep. For that reward they run the risk of being attacked, basically all fair game. Now that I am thinking about it this is so hypocritical, every trip I have ever been on with wg, we have attacked any white dot that we come across, except for an obvious skiller who is using brawling gloves (as they are not there for ep but bc it is the only place they can use brawlers). But according to the oldschool ARpking rules, if that player didnt attack us we shouldnt attack them right?(correct me if Im wrong) All Im trying to say is that in my opinion it is nh to ddos, crash planned fights,1 item, but not to kill a player that intentionally went to a pvp world for their own gain. Im sure a lot of the nostalgic old school members will disagree with me, but opinions are like assholes, we all have one.

That's not what AntiRpking is. It is what most people think it is though, which is why we have so much trouble enforcing it. AntiRpking isn't some rigid code of rights and wrongs that you just do, at it's baseline it's Pk'ing ETHICALLY. Regardless of how the game evolves that will never go away. There will still be ethical decisions to be made, it's not just about whether or not we kill skillers. A huge part of it is if a WG raid of 50-75 people (yeah) runs into a lower level group of 3 PK'ers barely into the 100s who are out to have some fun. Is it ETHICAL for us to kill them? I doubt it.

There are risks to being in a PK'ing world. AntiRpking says that regardless of those risks, we still shouldn't act like dicks "because they knew the risks beforehand." It's about ethics, fairness, and being a decent person.
QUOTE
With that being said and to keep things fair I am requesting to be suspended as well. Yesterday I killed a guy that was inside bh crater killing greaters. He wasnt wearing brawlers and didnt have any real expensive gear on just rune, but he was there to kill greaters and gain ep.
And you should be. But you get points from me for being honest.
QUOTE: "Kung Man149")
I find this post to be insanely stupid because we've all killed skiller's at some point.
Hell I've even killed a few in my time so does that mean i should be suspended as well?

I'm just saying this post is over the top.
I never have since joining WG. I can honestly testify to that.

yea pretty much agree with this guy......

haven't killed a skiller since I joined wg.

+1, i never attack non pkers on raids

By WG_Keanu on 17/06/2010
user posted image

Authentic. His Lordship, 2005.

Humour over. You can say ARPKing is dead, but we FREQUENTLY run into people in the wild on our raids (Or hell, even in Fally) who are obviously not PKers. And what do we do? We attack them and kill them.

I've always made a point to avoid attacking them. I'll personally emphaise this from now on.

By ImBryanMan on 19/06/2010
QUOTE: Eregion2 @ June 13, 2010 03:13 pm)
QUOTE: ImBryanMan June 12, 2010 05:16 pm
Im sure a lot of the nostalgic old school members will disagree with me, but opinions are like assholes, we all have one.

That's not what AntiRpking is. It is what most people think it is though, which is why we have so much trouble enforcing it. AntiRpking isn't some rigid code of rights and wrongs that you just do, at it's baseline it's Pk'ing ETHICALLY. Regardless of how the game evolves that will never go away. There will still be ethical decisions to be made, it's not just about whether or not we kill skillers. A huge part of it is if a WG raid of 50-75 people (yeah) runs into a lower level group of 3 PK'ers barely into the 100s who are out to have some fun. Is it ETHICAL for us to kill them? I doubt it.

There are risks to being in a PK'ing world. AntiRpking says that regardless of those risks, we still shouldn't act like dicks "because they knew the risks beforehand." It's about ethics, fairness, and being a decent person

Ethics is morality with loopholes. The ethics have changed with the game that was my original point. If Im in lv 50 wild and watch a long fight and 1 guy dies, Id have the oppurtunity to get an easy kill but I dont, Id even go a step further and offer the guy food. I consider myself an honor pker, that it is one of the main factors that attracted me to join wg. I dont want to offend whatsoever, nor do I mean to disrespect your history with wg, but youre retired, when was the last time youve pked/played rs? I cant take your opinion serious when it comes to this subject. Im not new to rs I know how things were a few years ago, and I really wish it was still that way. If 3 lvl 100s are at greaters just to have a good time they still know the risk they are taking, if 50-75 wg run into them they WILL kill them(speaking based on every single time Ive been in the wilderness with wg, no matter who was leading). Its just a game, its just pixels, its just 1 pk set that they lost. In my opinion this attitude would just damage our already delicate standing in the wilderness (for what its worth, see last sentence of my first post lol). I could say more but I think Im rambling its late angryhahs.gif.png

By ImBryanMan on 19/06/2010
QUOTE: Kiwi011 @ June 13, 2010 03:50 pm)
yea pretty much agree with this guy......

haven't killed a skiller since I joined wg.

This all started over a member killing someone who was afk at bandits.....in a PVP WORLD. Last time I checked the bandits camp was available on all servers. The line has blurred between whats skilling and not.

By Quikdrawjoe on 19/06/2010
If you're risking gear in a PVP world and then AFK don't be surprised when you die.

By Kyle on 19/06/2010
QUOTE
Wilderness Guardians Code of Honour

While PKing, there is a code of honour that guides us. This code of honour ensures that we provide fair combat to our enemies and also maintain high standards for ourselves.

During Clan Raids/PK Events
No killing non-skulled soloers or small groups. Teams of unskulled are OK. This is in compliance with antiRPKing. If someone looks like they are PKing, they have to confirm it before you attack.
No deliberately crashing an organised fight between two or more clans, unless one or more of those clans is an enemy of WG
Do not wear welfare gear. On f2p, full warring gear is expected as the minimum to raids, and on P2P gear worth at least 200k cumulatively is required
Running away from a clan that is clearly overpowering us is acceptable for now, though this may change in a few months' time
Teleporting away from battle is not allowed
Logging out of a battle is not allowed
In single combat, PJing is not allowed, and tagging is not allowed unless the enemy is also tagging.
Luring is acceptable, as long as you don't backstab (eg. Ask them to join your team)
By Dallar on 20/06/2010
Okay, but I have weed

By Dallar on 20/06/2010
Okay, but I have weed

By Quikdrawjoe on 20/06/2010
QUOTE: Kyle @ June 19, 2010 09:28 pm)
QUOTE
Wilderness Guardians Code of Honour

While PKing, there is a code of honour that guides us. This code of honour ensures that we provide fair combat to our enemies and also maintain high standards for ourselves.

During Clan Raids/PK Events
No killing non-skulled soloers or small groups. Teams of unskulled are OK. This is in compliance with antiRPKing. If someone looks like they are PKing, they have to confirm it before you attack.
No deliberately crashing an organised fight between two or more clans, unless one or more of those clans is an enemy of WG
Do not wear welfare gear. On f2p, full warring gear is expected as the minimum to raids, and on P2P gear worth at least 200k cumulatively is required
Running away from a clan that is clearly overpowering us is acceptable for now, though this may change in a few months' time
Teleporting away from battle is not allowed
Logging out of a battle is not allowed
In single combat, PJing is not allowed, and tagging is not allowed unless the enemy is also tagging.
Luring is acceptable, as long as you don't backstab (eg. Ask them to join your team)

WG SLUMPING NH CLAN

By David on 21/06/2010
Brian, I just want to say one thing.

I get what you're saying, with new times we have to adapt and redefine our code of honor and ethics.

What I disagree with is your basis of what is OK and not-OK to kill.

You say that basically anyone in a PvP/BH world is fair game because they're using the system to their advantage. They're EPing so they can PK later and get loot. By that virtue, they're fair game. I see your point.

You say that in the past, it made sense to protect skillers in the Wilderness because there happened to be tasks that HAD to be done there, and there was no avoiding it (ie: Green Dragons).

What I don't think you take into account is the fact that they're still there for their personal gain. Your basis for saying everyone in a PvP/BH world being fair game is that they're there for their personal gain...well I had no other reason to go into the Wilderness in the past except for personal gain...what's the difference?

By Rodney75 on 21/06/2010
QUOTE: David June 21, 2010 05:08 am
You say that in the past, it made sense to protect skillers in the Wilderness because there happened to be tasks that HAD to be done there, and there was no avoiding it (ie: Green Dragons).

What I don't think you take into account is the fact that they're still there for their personal gain. Your basis for saying everyone in a PvP/BH world being fair game is that they're there for their personal gain...well I had no other reason to go into the Wilderness in the past except for personal gain...what's the difference?

The past is the past - talk about present

If on a PVP/Bounty world - I feel it's fair game nowadays.. But I stick to WG rules, it's clear we are still sticking to it (Anti-Rpk)- so I shall.

By Eregion2 on 21/06/2010
QUOTE: ImBryanMan)
Ethics is morality with loopholes. The ethics have changed with the game that was my original point. [....] Im not new to rs I know how things were a few years ago, and I really wish it was still that way.


Bryan, it's because I've been here so long that I can see things happening. This argument is not at all new; I know because I've been involved in it, literally, for years. I've argued and debated and thrown hissy fits, everything I can possibly think of to make people look around and realize what a shithole they're building for themselves.

One time I threw a temper tantrum so bad there's probably still people here who remember it.

It never works though. Nobody ever listens. They're happy to be followers. Skunks. They look at the clan community, and figure whatever works for them works for us too. We should fit in. We should do everything they do the way they do it. Then we can hang out at the same parties and be accepted and not get made fun of in the hallways.

It's bullcrap. That thinking has killed WG more times than I can count.

WG used to MEAN SOMETHING goddammit. We used to stand for honor and integrity and fair play in a sea of thousands of angsty teenage pricks who get off online by taking advantage of players not as well off as they are. They roll into a PvP area and just kill whatever they can and run from whatever offers them a true challenge.

I'm not some sort of maniacal zealot. And I'm not really aiming this at you Bryan so much as saying that this is a real issue and it's bigger than you guys are giving it credit for. If you want to see WG rise, RISE UP. Make something of yourselves. Dare to be different. Dare to stand up for what you believe in. Dare to make a difference.

The clan community needs to see that happen. They need to see someone step up out of the quagmire of this shitty pathetic little game and say that there's more to this. Honor is not dead and it's damn well never out of date. But I guess none of this matters. I mean, WG has done fine doing things this way the last few years, right?

*insert scornful laugh here*

Maybe you're right. Maybe I am out of date. It'll certainly be easier for you all to just fit in with the crowd. Smack the poor kids around and act cool. Fit in. But you know what? When WG fits in, then we don't stand out. There's nothing to make us different from any of the thousands of other pathetic clans in this pathetic little game.

So when WG stops standing up for itself, it will die. And it will die pathetically, alone, in a gutter, and the other clans will pick our bones clean and laugh at the remains. It's not what we do when it's easy damn it, it's how we act when the goings tough! That's now, if we bend we break. But if we dare to be different, we can thrive.
QUOTE: Snowzak)
How many breakoff clans and mass leavings has WG suffered?
You will say that WG never died. Well it did die each time those things happened. A clan is composed of a name, sure, but most importantly of people. When half those people get spread to wherever they'll get accepted, a clan has died.

WG has had more rebuildings than SA, with a particularity... We didn't give names to the remakes.

I, for one, do not want to work to rebuild a WG that will eventually shatter and fall.

I hope Zak doesn't mind me borrowing something he wrote years and years ago. I think it fits. WG isn't a clan it's a group of people who can ascribe to common ideals. I've watched those ideals get warped and twisted beyond recognizability and now people want to just toss them aside even though the damage is self-inflicted.

Grow some balls.

If you want to see WG thrive, do something about it.

My 0.02

By David on 21/06/2010
QUOTE: Rodney75 @ June 21, 2010 06:52 am)
QUOTE: David June 21, 2010 05:08 am
You say that in the past, it made sense to protect skillers in the Wilderness because there happened to be tasks that HAD to be done there, and there was no avoiding it (ie: Green Dragons).

What I don't think you take into account is the fact that they're still there for their personal gain. Your basis for saying everyone in a PvP/BH world being fair game is that they're there for their personal gain...well I had no other reason to go into the Wilderness in the past except for personal gain...what's the difference?

The past is the past - talk about present

If on a PVP/Bounty world - I feel it's fair game nowadays.. But I stick to WG rules, it's clear we are still sticking to it (Anti-Rpk)- so I shall.

I don't think you quite understand what I was saying...

I was just pointing out similarities between the past and the present in regards to Brian's reasoning for saying everyone on a PvP/BH world is fair game.

ARPK = Anti RANDOM Player Killing

This means no attacking of people not looking to fight.

This means people training with brawlers are NOT fair game because they're there to skill, not do combat.

This means that NOT everyone is fair game.

Sure the past is the past, and sure we have to look to the future, but does that mean we have to burn all remnants of our history and foundation? To stray from our core code of ARPKing would result in the loss of everything that is WG.

By Mmangler on 21/06/2010
I find this post to be insanely stupid because we've all killed skiller's at some point.
Hell I've even killed a few in my time so does that mean i should be suspended as well?

I'm just saying this post is over the top.

Uh, not all of us--hey, I just realized your the one that killed me when I was skilling (lol). However, in all seriousness, thanks to WG I am not afraid to go into the Wilderness--it also helps that I am 126 ftp.

By Kung Man149 on 21/06/2010
QUOTE: Mmangler @ June 21, 2010 05:53 pm)
I find this post to be insanely stupid because we've all killed skiller's at some point.
Hell I've even killed a few in my time so does that mean i should be suspended as well?

I'm just saying this post is over the top.

Uh, not all of us--hey, I just realized your the one that killed me when I was skilling (lol). However, in all seriousness, thanks to WG I am not afraid to go into the Wilderness--it also helps that I am 126 ftp.

So you're saying i killed you before Mmangler?
I don't recall the last time i killed someone in Wildy aside from my time in Raining Chaos.

By Eregion2 on 22/06/2010
Just a note don't get angry at me! I realize that last post seemed really argumentative and it wasn't strictly intentional. I just get really intense with this sometimes. biggrin.gif

Love you guys! I'm trying to help I swear.

By rachellove9 on 22/06/2010
QUOTE: Kung Man149 @ June 21, 2010 06:48 pm)
QUOTE: Mmangler June 21, 2010 05:53 pm
I find this post to be insanely stupid because we've all killed skiller's at some point.
Hell I've even killed a few in my time so does that mean i should be suspended as well?

I'm just saying this post is over the top.

Uh, not all of us--hey, I just realized your the one that killed me when I was skilling (lol).  However, in all seriousness, thanks to WG I am not afraid to go into the Wilderness--it also helps that I am 126 ftp.

So you're saying i killed you before Mmangler?
I don't recall the last time i killed someone in Wildy aside from my time in Raining Chaos.

Alain, read that again. I think you will find sarcasm in it. I believe he really is saying that he only has gone to pk-ing since coming to WG too.



Back to Topic Index

Developed by Mojo.