Back to Topic Index
ZT ...
By Kevin on 11/08/2010
<00:49:28> "Torreoria": Has WG got rid of Katie yet?
<00:49:49> "Kcross73": no
<00:50:16> "Torreoria": Then I will continue to not attend events
And she's apparently not the only one that feels that way.
I was going to invite ZT to our Big Five events, but I'm not even going to bother now.
Something needs to be done to fix this problem we have between our clans, and kicking Kat is not an option.
By Fbi3255 on 11/08/2010
Fk.
Shes got sumfin stuck up there lately.
By WG Justin on 11/08/2010
In all honesty she needs to get rid of that chip off of her shoulder, Katie is none of her business she has very limited interaction with them and when it is its initiated by ZT's members.
I am continuously seeing the same two or three people from ZT attending our events and noone else, I honestly feel as though they are becoming dead weight allies fast and we need to consider looking for other alliances that that will be cooperative and participate in our events.
By VEPHYSAURAS on 11/08/2010
I'll try to talk to them in bit. Rather boot them after this hectic month or maybe next.
Start looking for other allies now to be potentially added.
By Zemus3654 on 11/08/2010
I talk to Torr alot and shes one of my good friends, but yeah i have to agree this isnt ZT's business anymore and it's just becoming a bit immature.
By His_Lordship on 11/08/2010
One member in exchange for an alliance is unfair.
Kicking Katie is an option, but an unlikely one.
Don't rule it out.
By WG Justin on 11/08/2010
QUOTE: His_Lordship August 11, 2010 09:50 am |
One member in exchange for an alliance is unfair. Kicking Katie is an option, but an unlikely one. Don't rule it out.
|
There were rules set in place when Katie joined WG they have not been breached as far as I am concerned. You cant just boot someone because our allies leader is having a dummy spit.
I feel that ZT are going way to far, and in all honesty I would much prefer Katie as another active member in our clan over our alliance with ZT where we only ever see the same two to three ZT members at an event.
By His_Lordship on 11/08/2010
This isn't a democracy though.
If we have to choose between a member and an alliance, I'm just saying we should pick the alliance.
However, let's try and keep both.
By VEPHYSAURAS on 11/08/2010
If I had to choose between a member that makes a variety of events and an alliance that is merely 2 people at whatever pks we have going who would I choose?
That is the question in a blunt way.
By His_Lordship on 11/08/2010
If Kat had a penis, I bet half your answers would be different.
By VEPHYSAURAS on 11/08/2010
Uhh actually no it doesn't.
By Kyle on 11/08/2010
I still don't even know what this is all about.
QUOTE |
There were rules set in place when Katie joined WG they have not been breached as far as I am concerned.
|
Someone inform me?
By Sativas on 11/08/2010
I think keeping our members should be a bigger concern then keeping our allies.
If we can't stand on our own two then what can we do?
ZT's leadership is disappointing to me. Holding onto such a stupid grudge and jeopardizing our alliance.
Sounds like someone doesn't appreciate the alliance we have.
And I would say the same thing for any active member, Male or female.
By DZ on 11/08/2010
/me is out of the loop
By Kevin on 11/08/2010
QUOTE: His_Lordship @ August 11, 2010 04:50 am) |
One member in exchange for an alliance is unfair. Kicking Katie is an option, but an unlikely one. Don't rule it out.
|
If Katie is kicked over this, it will result in a shitstorm.
And if you try to lie about the reason why she was kicked, guess who will be the first person to tell everyone the real reason.
By Dieyou2000 on 11/08/2010
I have no idea what this is all about.
I think she joined before I was staff, so maybe this was discussed in here or level 4 and I haven't seen it.
Can somebody please fill me in on what exactly happened either on this thread or in a PM please? I prefer not judging a situation with limited knowledge.
In my opinion, I would rather lose ZT as an alliance than lose Katie as a member, and no Gene this is not because she is a girl. As everybody else has said, we basically see the same 3 or 4 members at our events over and over, and CJ (Underceige; Sir Calmdown) constantly has to leave raids to go pk with Renegade which Torr also had issues with many ZT members joining Renegade. She forced her members to choose between the two, but for some reason CJ stayed in both, so I don't know what the situation is there.
By rachellove9 on 12/08/2010
TBH The only ones in staff that should know about this personal and sensitive matter is Gene, George and myself. It should not of become an issue for anyone else. Katt is doing great in WG. She has caused some trouble with ZT though even since coming to WG. I have to agree with Gene that if she had a pns that some of you would feel differently about the choice.
I personally want Katt to stay. I really like her. Our alliance has greatly suffered and it is why ZT has only those few that attend our things. Part of the agreement was that ZT alliance would come first if we had any trouble. We have to stick by our word. It's not up to any of you to break that agreement. It was an arrangement to allow her to still enjoy a nice clan.
I would prefer that ZT stay out of contact with Kat but they really need to start attending our events/raids too.
I have spent a lot of time talking with Torri about all this and also with Katt. Katt knows that I'm very supportive of her being in WG and Torri has accepted that I like Katt on a personal lvl.
Instead of avoiding ZT, I think invite them more and let them know what they are missing. If they value the alliance they will accept that Katt is part of WG. Sometimes when you have been wronged, it is hard to get over but not impossible.
By Kevin on 12/08/2010
QUOTE |
TBH The only ones in staff that should know about this personal and sensitive matter is Gene, George and myself
|
Torri told me the whole story a while ago, and why shouldn't the rest of staff be aware about it?
QUOTE |
It should not of become an issue for anyone else.
|
It has become an issue for everyone else, because ZT is making it an issue for everyone else.
QUOTE |
She has caused some trouble with ZT though even since coming to WG.
|
Really? Give me an example.
QUOTE |
I have to agree with Gene that if she had a pns that some of you would feel differently about the choice.
|
I highly resent that statement. I would stick up for anybody in this type of situation.
And if she had a penis, Torri wouldn't have as much of an issue with her. It's a catfight/grudge match, one that could only happen between two women - although Torri is the one taking the offensive.
QUOTE |
Part of the agreement was that ZT alliance would come first if we had any trouble.
|
The trouble we have is being caused by ZT, not Kat. So if ZT is causing the trouble (by holding this grudge and refusing to attend events), should not the agreement be voided?
QUOTE |
Instead of avoiding ZT, I think invite them more and let them know what they are missing.
|
I've tried numerous times to get ZT involved with our events, but time and time again I am told by Torri that not many ZT will come if Kat is still in our clan. She has seemed to step it up recently, by telling me what she told me in the first post of this topic. I will personally not waste my time to set anything up with ZT if Torri and the rest of their clan continue to keep this stance.
By rachellove9 on 12/08/2010
Torri should not be gossiping about Katt to anyone. This really is unfair to Katt. She came to WG to start over not have everyone talking about her.
I want to know what everyone thought about the alliance before Katt came to WG. Was it wonderful then? See I never thought ZT was all that active with us before, but I might be wrong.
Anytime it is an embarrassing situation for someone, I think the less people know the better. Why should the reasons Katt got kicked from ZT be anyone in staff's business other than those that were accepting her into WG. It is not a clan matter for you all to be talking and gossiping about. The new council had to know because issues came up. Those issues are posted in lvl 4. It is not something we are going to be leaking.
Going at Torri about Katt isn't going to solve it. I saw logs that they both attacked each other just a few days ago. It goes both ways. Katt reacts to things in a bad way too. Really the more you guys try to help Katt and get involved the worse it will get.
Stick to the alliance being crappy because they don't attend our things. Don't bring Torri and Katt's fighting into this.
By Kevin on 12/08/2010
QUOTE: rachellove9 @ August 11, 2010 09:51 pm) |
Going at Torri about Katt isn't going to solve it.
...
Stick to the alliance being crappy because they don't attend our things.
|
But if we want to fix the alliance, we have to fix the reason behind that.
If talking to Torri about it won't fix it, than what will?
By Sativas on 12/08/2010
I'm going to have to agree with Rachel that the entire staff doesn't need to hear whatever happened previously. If the council thought what she did was bad enough to tell everyone I doubt she would have gotten accepted.
See the thing is they don't even have to like each other, but they don't need to be rude to each other either.
What's happened to the 'Show Courtesy At All Times' rule?
Even if they aren't in WG I think the same rule should still be obeyed.
By Kyle on 12/08/2010
Trying to understand why Council can't trust STAFF with something.
By Dieyou2000 on 12/08/2010
QUOTE: Kyle @ August 11, 2010 11:21 pm) |
Trying to understand why Council can't trust STAFF with something.
|
This...
I feel I have not only a right to know this, but a NEED.
By VEPHYSAURAS on 12/08/2010
If its private we should also trust in the staff that know it to make the best decision while keeping it that way.
By Kevin on 12/08/2010
QUOTE: VEPHYSAURAS @ August 12, 2010 01:18 am) |
If its private we should also trust in the staff that know it to make the best decision while keeping it that way.
|
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
By Dieyou2000 on 12/08/2010
This "The staff doesn't/shouldn't know because it's none of their business" is kind of getting on my nerves.
Normally, you would be correct, but ZT is MAKING it an issue, and we as leaders of WG need to know all the facts to make a decision on what to do about this.
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I'm pretty sure most of us are mature enough not to go leaking this info to normal members. What Kat did does not deserve what kind of response Torr and ZT are pushing onto not only her, but us; who have done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING wrong except accept (lol @ 2 exact same words spelled differently) somebody that wanted to join our clan. As staff, it is our responsibility to be impartial to the opinions/personal life of a clan member unless they actually murder or rape somebody irl. I think I can keep this issue to myself, and make a mature, informed decision about this.
Amazingly, even knowing this information, I am not going to tell any members what went on with Kat and ZT, and I am not going to let it affect my treatment of Kat...how will I do it? Flying Spaghetti Monster only knows...
By His_Lordship on 12/08/2010
QUOTE: Kcross73 @ August 11, 2010 05:49 pm) |
QUOTE: His_Lordship August 11, 2010 04:50 am |
One member in exchange for an alliance is unfair. Kicking Katie is an option, but an unlikely one. Don't rule it out.
|
If Katie is kicked over this, it will result in a shitstorm.
And if you try to lie about the reason why she was kicked, guess who will be the first person to tell everyone the real reason.
|
How dare you accuse me of lying to my clan.
How could that enter your head.
You're more likely to lie to wg than me.
By Fbi3255 on 12/08/2010
Firstly :What happened with Kat should stay with the people that know it and noone else its not ours to share.
Second: Kicking a member for an alliance in not what a community is about.
Third: what dieyouu i think said is true its very rarely more than a few ZT's that are interested in our events and would still come either way.
Fourth: The alliance with Zt does need work and so does the alliance with Sabres but its hard to intergrate clans.
Fifth: Kat has been very active is generally nice and does care a lot about this clan personally i know she would be crushed if she got kicked.
Sixth: Comments like "if she had a dick this would be a different story" are not needed. It wouldn't would you kick any of our members in the same category as Kat even if they are blokes.
What we need to do is to work this out with Torre because most of the grudge held is with her i have talked to Kat and Torr on several occasions about this and ill keep trying to make a agreement with her without jeopardizing the alliance.
By George on 12/08/2010
I think we're all forgetting the fact that we ASKED TORREORIA before accepting Kat's app to make sure that she would accept it.
She wasn't too happy about it, but promised me as a friend, that she would try to make it work.
Torr can't just go back on that now... kat's done nothing wrong, as far as i'm aware...
By Kevin on 12/08/2010
QUOTE: His_Lordship @ August 12, 2010 05:07 am) |
QUOTE: Kcross73 August 11, 2010 05:49 pm |
QUOTE: His_Lordship August 11, 2010 04:50 am |
One member in exchange for an alliance is unfair. Kicking Katie is an option, but an unlikely one. Don't rule it out.
|
If Katie is kicked over this, it will result in a shitstorm.
And if you try to lie about the reason why she was kicked, guess who will be the first person to tell everyone the real reason.
|
How dare you accuse me of lying to my clan. How could that enter your head. You're more likely to lie to wg than me.
|
I didn't accuse you of lying.
By Sativas on 12/08/2010
No reason to be snapping at each other. We're all on the same side.
Back to Topic Index