Back to Topic Index

The EPers Debate

By Randy on 15/09/2010
So, should we be able to kill EPers on raids?
The current rules is no, but there seems to be no clarification as to why.

Reason why we should be able to:
-They're not innocent. Anyone who chooses to gain EP is clearly knowledgable about PvP and is participating in a PvP activity. It is not a Runescape skill. I understand not attacking people with brawlers, but this is a completely different reason for being in the wilderness. I would even go as far as to say that they're using their drops for more PKing.
-More loot for members on raids.

By Fbi3255 on 15/09/2010
Well considering they log into a PVP world, they are essentially braking the jagex rules by abusing the pvp drop system, they intend to use the ep to kill people later. Eping is not skilling in any form you do not gain experience. I think that we should be able to kill eper's they make a conscious choice to log on and most of them afk another rule that they are braking.

By JC on 15/09/2010
QUOTE: Fbi3255 @ September 16, 2010 11:58 am)
Well considering they log into a PVP world, they are essentially braking the jagex rules by abusing the pvp drop system, they intend to use the ep to kill people later. Eping is not skilling in any form you do not gain experience. I think that we should be able to kill eper's they make a conscious choice to log on and most of them afk another rule that they are braking.

I just have to say you're incorrect there Jordan, it is not against the RS rules to sit in PvP with the intent of gaining EP. At the end of the day to gain EP you have to be in PvP with over 76k of items, so (with some exceptions) you always have the potential to loose that.

Jagex has always stated that EP is only one factor in determining what drop you get in PvP anyway, with Target kills and DP being important as well. They do say that '76k'ing' is against the spirit of the game, but once again, it's not strictly against the rules.

I'm on the fence with EP'er killing, because while I agree that ultimately they will use that EP to kill people the WG ARPK code does not state "We must not kill skillers", it states:

QUOTE
No killing people who are in the wilderness who are CLEARLY not there for a fight


ie. "Randomers". I guess you can decide based on their intent to Pk in the future, or that they are a 'randomer' while EP'ing neko2.gif

By Randy on 15/09/2010
Our rules are still based off of the old wilderness.
You couldn't stand in the wildy in 2003 and gain cash for doing nothing.

By WG_Keanu on 15/09/2010
I like these topics. It gives us a moment to reflect on our beliefs and think deep into the foundations of the syndicate.

EPers being innocent is an ongoing debate. I have a solution. WG's first rules:
http://web.archive.org/web/20040921105039/...d/policies.html

QUOTE
Under no circumstances must any member of the Wilderness Guardians PK a player with no skull above his or her head
Death pays death, and those who enter the Wilderness to kill for fun have no business with this clan whatsoever.


Imagine the skull system is still in effect. EPers do not attack anyone, and therefore would not be skulled. And don't forget ARPKing means Anti-Random Player Killing - EPers fall under that category.

They are no threat to innocents, and even though they are using the PvP system in the way it is meant to be used, it is not abuse, as there is no rule against it. I have EP'ed, and I think it would be fairly hard to find another WG member who hasn't at some point. It is unfair to assume they would use their profits for PKing, as their reasons vary from person to person. Ask yourself, how would you feel if you were killed by an ARPK clan when you bore no threat to anyone else? To me, it makes us look as if we are simply drop-whores who lack morals.

I will not attack an EPer on a raid. I stand by the concept that our only adversaries in the wild should be people who are prepared to fight.

By Randy on 16/09/2010
Well you obviously failed to read my last post.
Again, WG's rules are based off of the old wilderness.
The old wilderness did not award players for standing there.
In fact, the new wilderness is a minigame.
Anyone who enters i is now a player.

By Fbi3255 on 16/09/2010
Keanu, so what your saying is that if we say run into cwa and theres a person sitting there not attacking anyone and not with a clan we should stay off them? They could be eping. Epers in extent are logging into a PVP world to kill other players eventually.

By Pyroclastic0 on 16/09/2010
Just because someone has the potential to kill someone later doesn't give us the right to kill them.
In my eyes eping is now part of the game and under the clan i've always thought we were only ment to kill people who were looking for a fight and epers aren't untill they gear up and stuff.
killing them only leads to them getting more drop potential anyway and anyone who can sit in one spot in the wilderness for hours on end doing nothing can do it if they want. I would find it harder to do that than trying to skill

By Fbi3255 on 16/09/2010
The thing is that pyro alot of these eper's break rules. Either Afking on runescape which is agianst the rules or they bot to stay online and get the ep.

By WG_Keanu on 16/09/2010
QUOTE: Fbi3255 @ September 16, 2010 10:18 am)
Keanu, so what your saying is that if we say run into cwa and theres a person sitting there not attacking anyone and not with a clan we should stay off them?

If they aren't prepared for a fight eg. have no gear, then yes we should stay off them.

QUOTE
Epers in extent are logging into a PVP world to kill other players eventually.


But not innocents. The person they kill would have to be either a target or risking 76k themselves, so unless they go EPer-hunting themselves (which I doubt), they bear no threat to our cause. If they're clearly AFK or botting, then I'd turn a blind eye to it. But I hate to see WG chasing a person who is clearly not AFK or botting and not prepared for a fight.

QUOTE
Again, WG's rules are based off of the old wilderness.


But we can transfer certain words across, like "weak", "innocent" and "random". It's how we apply them to the new system that matters.

By JC on 16/09/2010
QUOTE: Fbi3255 @ September 17, 2010 12:21 am)
The thing is that pyro alot of these eper's break rules. Either Afking on runescape which is agianst the rules or they bot to stay online and get the ep.

Okay Jordan, gotta ask what your point is there?

Am I allowed to go killing most of WG's staff (and I would suspect, the majority of WG to some extent) because the vast majority log into each others accounts? I know you PK on other members accounts so why the sudden "omgf they're rule breaking, I'm on the moral high ground"?

I disagree with any assumption that "If X is doing this I assume they're doing that" because in general it is a select few who make the majority of people look bad and I suspect that the amount of EP'ers that break other rules is smaller than you think.

I think if any decision is made it should be based on facts rather than 'assumptions' that because they're EP'ing they must be botting/afking/<insert randomly selected rule breaking here>.

By Quikdrawjoe on 16/09/2010
By WG_Keanu on 16/09/2010
QUOTE: Quikdrawjoe @ September 16, 2010 04:17 pm)
topic lolz

Original:
QUOTE
* Do not wear welfare gear. On f2p, full warring gear is expected as the minimum to raids, and on P2P gear worth at least 200k cumulatively is required


Revised:
QUOTE
* Do not wear 1 item.


Sly tongue.gif

By Fbi3255 on 16/09/2010
Im just trying to justify that while eper's are not harmful, take into consideration that effectively they are taking there own risk by eping. Pretty much anyone that logs into a pvp world is taking a risk. If they want no risk they can stay away from pvp worlds which alot of people do. The amount of people that go on to pvp worlds for the strict activity of skilling are very limited and are easy to spot. Im not saying people dont 76k but in doing so they are taking a risk they will loose their items.

By Flame Outlaw on 16/09/2010
It goes under the thought of do you follow the letter of the law or the meaning of the law. The meaning of the rule was to prevent the killing of innocents in the wilderness. Those that are skilling/training or just exploring the wilderness are what is defined as innocents.

We no longer have to worry about innocents in the wilderness as they simply will not go to a pk world, as for the skillers/training. We can easily spot them and identify them by there location in the wilderness.

Epers do not follow under any of those, they are pkers who kill other players often enough that they have a need to sit in the wilderness and regain there ep.

I see np in killing these people. They are the people that kill skillers/trainers. I feel as if we are actually guarding the wilderness by killing them. So I don't this as breaking the arpking rule at all.

By WG_Keanu on 17/09/2010
QUOTE: Flame Outlaw @ September 16, 2010 11:19 pm)
I see np in killing these people. They are the people that kill skillers/trainers.

I EP and I don't kill skillers/trainers blink.gif

By Flame Outlaw on 17/09/2010
QUOTE: WG_Keanu @ September 16, 2010 08:04 pm)
QUOTE: Flame Outlaw September 16, 2010 11:19 pm
I see np in killing these people. They are the people that kill skillers/trainers.

I EP and I don't kill skillers/trainers blink.gif

Us and the Sabres are an exception to that, as we don't kill skillers/trainers.

By JC on 17/09/2010
QUOTE: Fbi3255 @ September 16, 2010 10:18 pm)
Epers in extent are logging into a PVP world to kill other players eventually.

Just had a thought about this:

Who are we to 'punish' people for something they may do sometime in the future? by the same argument if someone is using brawlers they must have PK'd someone at some point in time, so they aren't innocent either. Are they fine to PK?

I guess my overall thought is stick to the "Here and now" and PK only those who are there to PK, if they're EP'ing so be it, they're still clearly not there to PK at that moment. If WG got a reputation for killing EP'ers I suspect you would find we'll loose allot of credibility as an 'honour' clan, as well as looking pretty pixel hungry.

By Fbi3255 on 17/09/2010
Like Cory said there is no classification for this group. They could be out there to ep and when they see a skillers location because they often ep at these spots gear and up get them. Even so there not there to skill they are there to get ep and kill people no matter who it is.

By WG_Keanu on 17/09/2010
QUOTE: Flame Outlaw @ September 17, 2010 02:37 am)
QUOTE: WG_Keanu September 16, 2010 08:04 pm
       
QUOTE: Flame Outlaw  September 16, 2010 11:19 pm
I see np in killing these people. They are the people that kill skillers/trainers.

I EP and I don't kill skillers/trainers blink.gif

Us and the Sabres are an exception to that, as we don't kill skillers/trainers.

Yeah, but think about it from an EPer's point of view. You've just spent 4 hours sitting around getting 100% EP. Do you go kill a guy with a rune pickaxe or go after someone with half a mil worth of gear? Like JC said, we can't judge people on what they *might* do, for all we know they could just do a triangle and be done with it.

By Randy on 18/09/2010
QUOTE: WG_Keanu @ September 17, 2010 07:26 am)
QUOTE: Flame Outlaw September 17, 2010 02:37 am
       
QUOTE: WG_Keanu  September 16, 2010 08:04 pm
       
QUOTE: Flame Outlaw  September 16, 2010 11:19 pm
I see np in killing these people. They are the people that kill skillers/trainers.

I EP and I don't kill skillers/trainers blink.gif

Us and the Sabres are an exception to that, as we don't kill skillers/trainers.

Yeah, but think about it from an EPer's point of view. You've just spent 4 hours sitting around getting 100% EP. Do you go kill a guy with a rune pickaxe or go after someone with half a mil worth of gear? Like JC said, we can't judge people on what they *might* do, for all we know they could just do a triangle and be done with it.

If you think about it, someone who does a triangle is technically killing an "innocent." They must kill someone who is also risking. Therefore, triangling is technically player killing.

By WG_Keanu on 18/09/2010
QUOTE: Randy @ September 18, 2010 03:12 am)
If you think about it, someone who does a triangle is technically killing an "innocent."

Incorrect sir. We've established that EPers don't fall under the category of "innocents", they're under "random".

Because we all do triangles at the end of raids, does that make us RPKers? No tongue.gif

By VEPHYSAURAS on 18/09/2010
If you put someone trial are they guilty before innocent or innocent before guilty? Who are we to judge? All we have to gain from it is a few more pixels for our bank if were lucky. To me even though under some of the current raid leaders up until recently we have been killing epers, we shouldn't be killing any eper since it is morally gray.

We can go back and forth through this as long as we keep changing the part that comes before this. Innocent before proven guilty or guilty before being proven innocent?

By Flame Outlaw on 18/09/2010
My point of view is there no longer innocent, because they have killed. Else they wouldn't have the need to restore there ep..

By VEPHYSAURAS on 19/09/2010
QUOTE: Flame Outlaw September 18, 2010 04:44 am
My point of view is there no longer innocent, because they have killed. Else they wouldn't have the need to restore there ep..

So by virtue of filling their EP they must automatically be intended to straight up pk with it? You ignored my point. I feel like I'm in a religious debate, I should have ignored this topic lol. Really though there is still the possibility of merely 76king/triangling and though it is discouraged it isn't against Jagex's rules. I feel like were using this just to get a few more pixels/drops for ourselves at raids.



By rachellove9 on 21/09/2010
I read all of this post up to here. I have to say I have never EP. I know there are others in WG that never do it either.

I was willing to revise the rules as was most of the council on the thread Joe link you to. Rereading these posts make it more clear that EP is a huge issue with some members. I do know that when I have been on raids with The Sabras they talk about our rules and it changes some of what they do. I'm not sure if it is just because WG leadership is along or not. (I may be known as the one to give out warns and suspensions.)

If you can really convince me, I will change it. So far you are not very convincing to me. It seems like we are just out for the pixels. I know that is true, but we have to be careful of our reputation too.

By Randy on 21/09/2010
QUOTE: rachellove9 @ September 21, 2010 07:43 am)
I read all of this post up to here. I have to say I have never EP. I know there are others in WG that never do it either.

I was willing to revise the rules as was most of the council on the thread Joe link you to. Rereading these posts make it more clear that EP is a huge issue with some members. I do know that when I have been on raids with The Sabras they talk about our rules and it changes some of what they do. I'm not sure if it is just because WG leadership is along or not. (I may be known as the one to give out warns and suspensions.)

If you can really convince me, I will change it. So far you are not very convincing to me. It seems like we are just out for the pixels. I know that is true, but we have to be careful of our reputation too.

The Sabres are allowed to kill Epers and I'm VERY curious as to why.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe they ended our previous alliance with them because they felt we weren't Arpking.
Yet they are allowed?

Hmm...

By WG_Keanu on 21/09/2010
QUOTE: rachellove9 @ September 21, 2010 12:43 pm)
So far you are not very convincing to me. It seems like we are just out for the pixels.

Anyone who thinks we should kill EPers is proving that statement true.

We're the Wilderness Guardians. And here we are, trying to make excuses and bend our morals to get pixels.

By Randy on 21/09/2010
QUOTE: WG_Keanu September 21, 2010 04:34 pm
       
QUOTE: rachellove9  September 21, 2010 12:43 pm
So far you are not very convincing to me.  It seems like we are just out for the pixels.

Anyone who thinks we should kill EPers is proving that statement true.

We're the Wilderness Guardians. And here we are, trying to make excuses and bend our morals to get pixels.

We're the Wilderness Guardians to only those who need guarding.
As you've said,
QUOTE
We've established that EPers don't fall under the category of "innocents", they're under "random".

So what exactly is a "random" ?
If they're not skilling or PKing, what other reason is there to be in a PvP world?
As Flame Outlaw said,
QUOTE
My point of view is there no longer innocent, because they have killed. Else they wouldn't have the need to restore there ep..

The ONLY reason to be gaining EP is to kill others.
It literally has no other use.
Why would a "random" be gaining EP then? To mine rocks? Cut trees?
No.
76king is a PvP activity and it is definitely not random or innocent.


By WG_Keanu on 21/09/2010
QUOTE: Randy @ September 21, 2010 09:43 pm)
.......76king is a PvP activity and it is definitely not random or innocent.

You're focusing on the killing bit. You're forgetting the endgame of EPing.

TO MAKE MONEY.

When was that a crime?

By Randy on 21/09/2010
QUOTE: WG_Keanu @ September 21, 2010 04:48 pm)
QUOTE: Randy September 21, 2010 09:43 pm
.......76king is a PvP activity and it is definitely not random or innocent.

You're focusing on the killing bit. You're forgetting the endgame of EPing.

TO MAKE MONEY.

When was that a crime?

Making money by killing other players.
That would classify them as PKers, and therefore free game.

By WG_Keanu on 21/09/2010
QUOTE: Randy @ September 21, 2010 09:56 pm)
QUOTE: WG_Keanu September 21, 2010 04:48 pm
       
QUOTE: Randy  September 21, 2010 09:43 pm
.......76king is a PvP activity and it is definitely not random or innocent.

You're focusing on the killing bit. You're forgetting the endgame of EPing.

TO MAKE MONEY.

When was that a crime?

Making money by killing other players.
That would classify them as PKers, and therefore free game.

But they don't kill innocents. They'd have to kill someone who was risking to even get a drop.

We kill other players on raids. Does that make us free game, and should we start BSing each other for it?

Your logic is simply invalid.

By Randy on 21/09/2010
QUOTE: WG_Keanu @ September 21, 2010 05:00 pm)
QUOTE: Randy September 21, 2010 09:56 pm
       
QUOTE: WG_Keanu  September 21, 2010 04:48 pm
       
QUOTE: Randy  September 21, 2010 09:43 pm
.......76king is a PvP activity and it is definitely not random or innocent.

You're focusing on the killing bit. You're forgetting the endgame of EPing.

TO MAKE MONEY.

When was that a crime?

Making money by killing other players.
That would classify them as PKers, and therefore free game.

But they don't kill innocents. They'd have to kill someone who was risking to even get a drop.

We kill other players on raids. Does that make us free game, and should we start BSing each other for it?

Your logic is simply invalid.

Rofl no... We PK as a clan.
We don't PK each other because it's against OUR rules.
EPers DO kill someone who is risking... that's the point of 76king.
They don't have to kill innocents to be a target.
If they're involved in any kind of PvP activity they are asking to be killed.

By WG_Keanu on 21/09/2010
QUOTE: Randy @ September 21, 2010 10:08 pm)
They don't have to kill innocents to be a target.
If they're involved in any kind of PvP activity they are asking to be killed.

1- They don't have to kill innocents to be a target. They have to be prepared for a fight to be a target.
2- We're involved in PvP activity - are we asking to be killed? I'm not

By Randy on 21/09/2010
QUOTE: WG_Keanu @ September 21, 2010 05:17 pm)
QUOTE: Randy September 21, 2010 10:08 pm
They don't have to kill innocents to be a target.
If they're involved in any kind of PvP activity they are asking to be killed.

1- They don't have to kill innocents to be a target. They have to be prepared for a fight to be a target.
2- We're involved in PvP activity - are we asking to be killed? I'm not

1- They are prepared for a fight since they're in PvP with the intention of killing someone in the future. As I said, if they're not skilling or PKing, what are they doing? All other activities can be done in a safe world.
2- Um yes, when you step into PvP, you are accepting the fact a giant clan may appear and kill you. It will not always happen but it is certainly a possibility. If you didn't want to die you wouldn't even think about going to PvP.

By WG_Keanu on 21/09/2010
QUOTE: Randy @ September 21, 2010 10:24 pm)
QUOTE: WG_Keanu September 21, 2010 05:17 pm
       
QUOTE: Randy  September 21, 2010 10:08 pm
They don't have to kill innocents to be a target.
If they're involved in any kind of PvP activity they are asking to be killed.

1- They don't have to kill innocents to be a target. They have to be prepared for a fight to be a target.
2- We're involved in PvP activity - are we asking to be killed? I'm not

1- They are prepared for a fight since they're in PvP with the intention of killing someone in the future. As I said, if they're not skilling or PKing, what are they doing? All other activities can be done in a safe world.

Making money. 76ks are a moneymaking method. They have nothing to do with killing innocents, and we can't assume that they do because it's illogical as well as immoral.

and those who enter the Wilderness to kill for fun have no business with this clan whatsoever.

By Randy on 21/09/2010
QUOTE: WG_Keanu @ September 21, 2010 05:35 pm)
QUOTE: Randy September 21, 2010 10:24 pm
       
QUOTE: WG_Keanu  September 21, 2010 05:17 pm
       
QUOTE: Randy  September 21, 2010 10:08 pm
They don't have to kill innocents to be a target.
If they're involved in any kind of PvP activity they are asking to be killed.

1- They don't have to kill innocents to be a target. They have to be prepared for a fight to be a target.
2- We're involved in PvP activity - are we asking to be killed? I'm not

1- They are prepared for a fight since they're in PvP with the intention of killing someone in the future. As I said, if they're not skilling or PKing, what are they doing? All other activities can be done in a safe world.

Making money. 76ks are a moneymaking method. They have nothing to do with killing innocents, and we can't assume that they do because it's illogical as well as immoral.

and those who enter the Wilderness to kill for fun have no business with this clan whatsoever.

Must I say it again?
76King is a moneymaking method that involves killing other players.
It doesn't matter WHO they're going to kill.
Whether they go kill an innocent or another PKer, it doesn't matter.

When the rules say:
QUOTE
No killing people who are in the wilderness who are CLEARLY not there for a fight

That's the thing: they ARE there for a fight. 76King is PvP.

By WG_Keanu on 21/09/2010
Re-read that rule.

QUOTE
No killing people who are in the wilderness who are CLEARLY not there for a fight


76kers aren't there for a fight. They're there to gain EP. They have no food or gear.

When they gear up and then go looking for a fight, THEN they're game.

By Randy on 21/09/2010
QUOTE: WG_Keanu @ September 21, 2010 06:03 pm)
Re-read that rule.

QUOTE
No killing people who are in the wilderness who are CLEARLY not there for a fight


76kers aren't there for a fight. They're there to gain EP. They have no food or gear.

When they gear up and then go looking for a fight, THEN they're game.

But again, they HAVE to go fight.
As I said earlier, killing is the only use for EP.
If you kill them while they're getting it or when they're trying to use it their goal remains the same.

And no, they almost always bring food and more often then not armor.

By Flame Outlaw on 21/09/2010
QUOTE: Randy @ September 21, 2010 05:07 pm)
QUOTE: WG_Keanu September 21, 2010 06:03 pm
Re-read that rule.

       
QUOTE
No killing people who are in the wilderness who are CLEARLY not there for a fight


76kers aren't there for a fight. They're there to gain EP. They have no food or gear.

When they gear up and then go looking for a fight, THEN they're game.

But again, they HAVE to go fight.
As I said earlier, killing is the only use for EP.
If you kill them while they're getting it or when they're trying to use it their goal remains the same.

And no, they almost always bring food and more often then not armor.

You're my hero, Randy, I tried making this point earlier.

I say we have it settled as a pole, for those higher plus, that have been in WG for awhile.

By WG_Keanu on 22/09/2010
QUOTE: Randy @ September 21, 2010 11:07 pm)
QUOTE: WG_Keanu September 21, 2010 06:03 pm
Re-read that rule.

       
QUOTE
No killing people who are in the wilderness who are CLEARLY not there for a fight


76kers aren't there for a fight. They're there to gain EP. They have no food or gear.

When they gear up and then go looking for a fight, THEN they're game.

But again, they HAVE to go fight.
As I said earlier, killing is the only use for EP.
If you kill them while they're getting it or when they're trying to use it their goal remains the same.

And what if they just kill someone who's agreed to triangle? Honest moneymaking, no innocents harmed, and doesn't break any rules.

QUOTE
And no, they almost always bring food and more often then not armor.


Then they're prepared for a fight in which case by all means kill them. But a no itemer without food, weapons or armour and clearly not botting or afk is no-go in my opinion.

By Randy on 22/09/2010
QUOTE: WG_Keanu @ September 21, 2010 08:52 pm)
QUOTE: Randy September 21, 2010 11:07 pm
       
QUOTE: WG_Keanu  September 21, 2010 06:03 pm
Re-read that rule.

       
QUOTE
No killing people who are in the wilderness who are CLEARLY not there for a fight


76kers aren't there for a fight. They're there to gain EP. They have no food or gear.

When they gear up and then go looking for a fight, THEN they're game.

But again, they HAVE to go fight.
As I said earlier, killing is the only use for EP.
If you kill them while they're getting it or when they're trying to use it their goal remains the same.

And what if they just kill someone who's agreed to triangle? Honest moneymaking, no innocents harmed, and doesn't break any rules.

QUOTE
And no, they almost always bring food and more often then not armor.


Then they're prepared for a fight in which case by all means kill them. But a no itemer without food, weapons or armour and clearly not botting or afk is no-go in my opinion.

Triangling is nothing more than PKing with trust involved.
It makes you money by abusing the PvP system.
Since triangling is not an official (meaning intended by Jagex) way of making money, players who decide to risk 76k in PvP are fair game to the rest of us.

to be continued, got appointment thing brb

By WG_Keanu on 22/09/2010
QUOTE
Since triangling is not an official (meaning intended by Jagex) way of...


Until 2007, neither were clans in general, we can't judge off that. 76ks aren't abuse of the PvP system - it's adaptation. If it was abuse, we'd all be banned. That's like saying clanning is an abuse of the game, because it wasn't originally designed for it.

Just because Jagex doesn't give the green light doesn't mean it's wrong to do it.

By VEPHYSAURAS on 22/09/2010
Randy. The main difference in 76king or Triangling is that both players or the group of players are willing to die to each other. The arguement that it is player killing defined in the strictest sense which it still is ignores the a fundamental difference in actually pking. Actual pking being the hunt and the competition of fighting another player and killing them or killing a skiller in a PvP world.

76king and Triangling do not have these attributes. It isn't so much player killing as it is a balanced trade among all parties. In traditional pking the other person killed loses all. So therefore it is difficult to see 76king grouped into the same narrow confines of typical pking.

Now to go back to my point earlier from a previous post here. If you kill someone clearly standing there EPing with no gear then how can you tell they are gaining for 76k or actual PK? You can't can you? So then we say well they could be pking later but the fact remains that they may also being tricking in some form. So under reasonable moral guidelines at least under usual jury cases in the United States it is always innocent until proven guilty right? We don't sentence a man or woman to death unless we know he or she is guilty.

So from my first point that 76king/Tricking/Triangling is a balanced trade among players (Ignore the fact that loot varies, that is a gamble everyone obviously accepts) therefore we can't kill EPers. At least based off moral pretenses that I assume we all share to be true.

By rachellove9 on 22/09/2010
QUOTE: WG_Keanu @ September 21, 2010 04:35 pm)
[QUOTE=WG_Keanu,September 21, 2010 05:17 pm] and those who enter the Wilderness to kill for fun have no business with this clan whatsoever.

LOL Seriously, that has to be one of the worst statements. It makes no sense at all. I hate the wild and the only reason I ever go is that I love the clan. But on occasion I will simply go to the wild to kill for fun or die. Not to often but I do it sometimes. I also shear sheep, pick flax or have a house party. All which are not really money makers but can be entertaining.

By Randy on 22/09/2010
It's funny that most of you see killing EPers as dishonorable. Perhaps you see it this way because EPing has become an acceptable practice in Runescape. Breaking news: The Runescape community is not honorable. I found what Jagex said on Runewiki, "76king is considered against the spirit of the game because it sets up predetermined results of kills." And while that's a bit cheesy at first, I also found this, "Players are not permitted to post about 76king other than the solutions on the RuneScape forums." My point is that Jagex does NOT support 76king and is looking for ways to remove it (hence the introduction to triangling, etc.).

A solution... Pkers? Us?

Seems a bit hypocritical for someone who 76ked majority of their bank to be against it, but I'm not.
If it exists, I will do it. But when I'm out there 76king, I'm aware of the dangers.
I'm also aware that whoever kills me is playing the game as was I.

If you 76k it doesn't make you a dishonorable player, nor are the people that killed you.
You're following the rules but at the same time aren't innocent because you're cheating the system.

By VEPHYSAURAS on 22/09/2010
QUOTE: Randy September 21, 2010 09:35 pm
It's funny that most of you see killing EPers as dishonorable. Perhaps you see it this way because EPing has become an acceptable practice in Runescape. Breaking news: The Runescape community is not honorable. I found what Jagex said on Runewiki, "76king is considered against the spirit of the game because it sets up predetermined results of kills." And while that's a bit cheesy at first, I also found this, "Players are not permitted to post about 76king other than the solutions on the RuneScape forums." My point is that Jagex does NOT support 76king and is looking for ways to remove it (hence the introduction to triangling, etc.).

A solution... Pkers? Us?

Seems a bit hypocritical for someone who 76ked majority of their bank to be against it, but I'm not.
If it exists, I will do it. But when I'm out there 76king, I'm aware of the dangers.
I'm also aware that whoever kills me is playing the game as was I.

If you 76k it doesn't make you a dishonorable player, nor are the people that killed you.
You're following the rules but at the same time aren't innocent because you're cheating the system.

How is a player cheating the system in Runescape by following the mechanics set obviously in place by the developers? The system itself has been laid out before us as it is, 76king was an obvious route that players could take on day one of PvP worlds being released. Jagex sees this as breaking the rules, but is it? Is a system flawed in the first place then become our responsibility to fix? No, the answer is not. If they want to ban someone or give someone black marks for breaking their defined rules then they can. It is not our responsibility to police a broken system. We are not the beta testers, we are the players. Do we report the player 76king if they want to enforce this rule so much? We easily outnumber a 76ker after we kill them why not report. Isn't it against the rules? How many of you actually do that? Raise your hand now.

We as the players must retain honor in the system laid out before us. Why? Well we laid out the system before us since the beginning to develop a code of honor and moral values within the context of the game. Arpking, invented by us, within the game mechanics. Honor within the game mechanics.

One could say back then that Arpking shouldn't be allowed because skillers risk going into the Wilderness. They are gaining by being there and us as pkers should be there to kill them for this to have merit. If the rewards are that valuable there must be a price to pay. It is their choice to be there by the mechanics and system in place under the pking system in place they aknowledge that they may die by a pker. Is this not the same of EPing? Is the advantage of skilling back a few years back equivalent to the present inflated economy of RS?

Yet the area is more gray still because some may be using this EP not in a balanced exchange but to pk themselves. So since we acknowledge EPing as a way to gain an advantage through the use of the wilderness bh world or of pvp worlds is it not so far different than the advantage that skillers have gained in the past in the wilderness? Sure the benefit seems bigger because drops can go up to 10m or so, yet most average around 400k-1m maybe if that. In an inflated economy that RS has at this moment in time that makes up for say the difference mining Runes ores years back.

Is it honorable to kill someone that may be simply making a 76king exchange with his friend? Isn't a balanced exchange fair among both players? How is that honorable to disrupt that? Who are we to interpret the difference and assume that all EPers should be punished. Shouldn't we instead acknowledge that there is a chance they are doing this in the spirit of equal exchange? An exchange that is equal to the reward that skillers gained from venturing into the wilderness. Didn't we used to protect that?

Our history is to be an honorable clan. Though we sometimes waiver from the path. Question it, argue it, or even bend and break it. Though bent or broken our pieces should never lay scattered. Hold those pieces of honor intact, bring them together reforge them in a new era stronger than before. We are players, we play within the mechanics and physical walls of the game. The developers never wrote honor into their player guide, they physically made it but they do not define it's spirit. We do. We embody this spirit everyday that we play.



By His_Lordship on 22/09/2010
I was avoiding posting for a very very long time. I thought I'd let the conflict play out so I could see peoples' values. Actually, I wanted to wait a bit more, but Vephy has brought up a lot of points.

I'm very torn over this. I could see killing EPer's as an honourable and dishonourable activity at the same time.

(This is the part of my post where I just sit here for 5 minutes typing nothing, thinking about the issues at hand)

The antiRPKing code was designed to uphold the highest values of honour. What path should be taken that maintains the highest level of honour?

PRO-EP Killing
76k'ing is not in the spirit of the game. We are cleansing the wilderness. They are not innocent

ANTI-EP Killing
They are harmless in the PKing cycle. They are about kill kill later in the cycle, but that's like pre-crime. Can we punish someone for a crime they will commit in the future? I think we can't - we can only try to catch them in the act. They are not PKers until they put on PKing gear.

My gut feeling is toward allowing them to live on raids, but if you're going solo, they are fair game. It is more honourable for a clan of our power to look for worthy adversaries, and not pray on the weak.

The original clan motto, was "We are the shield of the weak". This was later changed to innocent. The ENTIRE premise of antiRPKing is that we only fight those with enough power - to hunt the hunters.

There are already plenty of EP hunters. EPing isn't quite safe as an activity.
I am in agreement with my council. We leave EPers until circumstances change and they are not so vulnerable.

By Fbi3255 on 22/09/2010
I agree with your decision Gene not completely but i think that on raids it should not be our focus we should be trying to find opponents who will challenge us. Vephy this is the last arguement i would like to bring up.

- The Runescape PVP situation is unique, without the drop system RWT would flourish and with it people get rich off 76k's and other rewards sometimes not worth the effort. Jagex choose the option to offer a drop system this created a flaw within the system where people could make excess money off 76king. While it exist jagex has identified this as not in the spirit of the game however cannot officially ban people because the ability exists. It is discouraged but jagex is forced into this situations otherwise PVP would die and so would runescape. There is no resolution to this problem this is why i believe that people that wish to use this system no matter what they do while it is only in pvp worlds. They do it at a risk they could die especially people that AFK while eping which is a punishable offense. If i see a person AFK Eping i would kill them. In the wilderness eper's are rewarded for not an effort or skill but Luck. Eventually everyone gets lucky so while it is impossible to know whether they are innocent or not even if they are not they are abusing a system Jagex put into place to protect Runescape from RWT and reward the Pker's. Honestly if there was enough eper's and it got popular enough to overthrow the threat of RWT they would revert the system. For example Revenge killing. The day of fighting a mate and DMing them is over. Yeah you can do it once but anymore than that it gets pointless. This was caused by abusing of the system by Eper's if eper's never existed they would not have to tariff the drop's and PKer's. Any effort at stopping this i would highly agree with especially if it gets to a point where i we are risking parts of runescape that we enjoy. When the Wilderness got nerfed the clan world suffered MASSIVELY if they did something even worse than that which they could we could be protecting the clan killing Epers.

By JC on 22/09/2010
QUOTE: Fbi3255 @ September 22, 2010 10:20 pm)
- The Runescape PVP situation is unique, without the drop system RWT would flourish and with it people get rich off 76k's and other rewards sometimes not worth the effort. Jagex choose the option to offer a drop system this created a flaw within the system where people could make excess money off 76king. While it exist jagex has identified this as not in the spirit of the game however cannot officially ban people because the ability exists. It is discouraged but jagex is forced into this situations otherwise PVP would die and so would runescape. There is no resolution to this problem this is why i believe that people that wish to use this system no matter what they do while it is only in pvp worlds. They do it at a risk they could die especially people that AFK while eping which is a punishable offense. If i see a person AFK Eping i would kill them. In the wilderness eper's are rewarded for not an effort or skill but Luck. Eventually everyone gets lucky so while it is impossible to know whether they are innocent or not even if they are not they are abusing a system Jagex put into place to protect Runescape from RWT and reward the Pker's. Honestly if there was enough eper's and it got popular enough to overthrow the threat of RWT they would revert the system. For example Revenge killing. The day of fighting a mate and DMing them is over. Yeah you can do it once but anymore than that it gets pointless. This was caused by abusing of the system by Eper's if eper's never existed they would not have to tariff the drop's and PKer's. Any effort at stopping this i would highly agree with especially if it gets to a point where i we are risking parts of runescape that we enjoy. When the Wilderness got nerfed the clan world suffered MASSIVELY if they did something even worse than that which they could we could be protecting the clan killing Epers.

Paragraphs are your friend, I was gasping for breath just reading that neko2.gif

By Randy on 22/09/2010
Thank you for putting effort into your responses.
I don't necessarily agree with all of you but I understand your points and if you feel so strongly opposed to killing them then I won't argue anymore.

Giving some clarification to this rule to the rest of the clan would clear up some confusion.

By Pyroclastic0 on 22/09/2010
easily solved
They're not epers they're scouts tracking you pking therefore you can kill them hash.png
alot of scouts at wilderness volcano and rouges castle these days



Back to Topic Index

Developed by Mojo.