P2P Wars

By Jayson on 17/03/2011

http://forums.zybez.net/topic/1490683-wg-l...p2p-pvp-fights/

Got alot of interest there.

Final Intervention ( #fi.public ) looks okay, same with new bloods ( #Nb-lobby )

And AF wouldn't be bad for some good matched fights.

Now, the question is, do we want P2P?

Discuss, if we are still into P2P, ill get a full out for next weekend.

By Armybuilder1 on 17/03/2011

I think yes. Although personally f2p is where the ranks come from or thats how it seems. WG just doenst enjoy f2p sadly +(

So yes. We get into p2p

By Randy on 17/03/2011

Try and stay away from AF... they can tank over 9000 times longer than us.

I'd say PE or NB I guess.

By Armybuilder1 on 17/03/2011

QUOTE

[16:34:07] <Ant-> Hey wanna set up a fight with AF
[16:34:18] <Armybuilder> sup
[16:34:19] <Armybuilder> umm
[16:34:31] <Armybuilder> Ive gotta talk to the warlords and stuff about it first
[16:34:37] <Armybuilder> id be up for it
[16:34:49] <Armybuilder> but i need to talk to them first +)
[16:35:29] <Ant-> Ok well we're only pulling like 40s atm
[16:35:35] <Armybuilder> kk
[16:35:38] <Ant-> so we're up for whatever
[16:35:43] <Armybuilder> aye
[16:35:51] <Armybuilder> we'll ill remember
[16:36:05] <Armybuilder> but as you saw on the thread on rsc
[16:36:13] <Armybuilder> did say 20-25 i think
[16:36:20] <Ant-> 30-40
[16:36:24] <Armybuilder> ahh kk
[16:36:30] <Armybuilder> ill talk to him anyway
[16:36:44] <Ant-> our most recent fights
[16:36:44] <Ant-> http://forums.zybez.net/topic/1490379-ancient-furys-tuesday/
[16:36:48] <Ant-> so youc an see our pulls
[16:38:39] <Armybuilder> thanks man ill ome find you in #af if you want to sort it out when i have an answer

You mean stay away like that??

means i go to him now.. whic is not going to happen. Due to this and wg's current state +)

By Randy on 17/03/2011

It doesn't matter how many AF pull - it's matched ops.
They would simply out preform us.

By Jayson on 18/03/2011

Yea, AF would dominate us, but if we're desperate for action it'll be good to fight them

Back to Topic Index