Back to Topic Index
My Best Art
By His_Lordship on 29/03/2011
Probably the best WG Artwork I've ever done.
Here's the background.
Here's the background.
| QUOTE |
|
And after I put in the characters, massive difference.
After eight hours, you get this:
| QUOTE |
|
By ZurvivorMan on 29/03/2011
Love it, good work!
By Vulcan Sin on 29/03/2011
Great Work
GoodLuck!
GoodLuck!
By Renoldojr10 on 29/03/2011
That's hot stuff, great work.
By Mark on 30/03/2011
May i ask where you got 'The Legendary Warring Clan' from?
And have you ever thought about blending/smearing the bold colors to make it look that little bit more realistic? I'm imagining it'd take a while.
And have you ever thought about blending/smearing the bold colors to make it look that little bit more realistic? I'm imagining it'd take a while.
By His_Lordship on 30/03/2011
Yeah I could do all that, and I could add shadows too, but I deliberately exclude all that to give my art a distinct style. Unmistakeably His Lordship.
"The legendary warring clan" was a title bestowed on us by a few RSC members back in 2006 and I want to use it as our tag line.
"The legendary warring clan" was a title bestowed on us by a few RSC members back in 2006 and I want to use it as our tag line.
By Nick on 30/03/2011
While I understand the reason for blurring the background, it seems a bit much, especially with the volcano.
I always have loved what you do with the characters. I recognize a few from past videos.
Regardless, I think you did a great job.
I always have loved what you do with the characters. I recognize a few from past videos.
Regardless, I think you did a great job. By Samurai-JM on 31/03/2011
LOVE IT, except for the text. sharp text on blurry mountains = makes no sense
By WizardOfGod on 31/03/2011
Vnice lordy, you sir are a leg.
By Masamune39 on 07/04/2011
I just jizzed. Great job, Gene. You're a damn talented person, man.
By Zooby69 on 08/04/2011
Its good 
By Colinwarrior on 20/04/2011
Wow, this is very good. I like it. Keep it up, Gene!
By Nonchalant on 27/04/2011
Lol, posting on a basically dead post...
Anyways, I like it. Good use of aerial perspective in your transition from back to foreground. The only place where this strays is the tree in the upper right that sort of looks as though it was added as an afterthought. Not sure if it was intentionally left as clear as it is, but it seems like something to address and keep in mind for future works.
The figure in white in the left middle ground of the work seems to be disproportioned with the rest of the figures. It's not really a major problem, but if you're going for realism, this becomes incredibly evident with the tree being placed right next to the figure. Looking back, the perspective on the mid-ground in general seems to be struggling back and forth for an identity.
Despite that, the proportions for the foreground and background are great. Good forms and solid chiaroscuro that lends itself well to this style. I'm going to go ahead and disagree with some others on your choice of a crisp font for the text. I personally feel that it contrasts nicely with the rest of the work in a way that, combined with the orthogonals of the foreground figures' arms, draws the viewers eye around the entire piece.
Summary: For the most part, I liked it. It'll be interesting to see how you continue developing your style.
Anyways, I like it. Good use of aerial perspective in your transition from back to foreground. The only place where this strays is the tree in the upper right that sort of looks as though it was added as an afterthought. Not sure if it was intentionally left as clear as it is, but it seems like something to address and keep in mind for future works.
The figure in white in the left middle ground of the work seems to be disproportioned with the rest of the figures. It's not really a major problem, but if you're going for realism, this becomes incredibly evident with the tree being placed right next to the figure. Looking back, the perspective on the mid-ground in general seems to be struggling back and forth for an identity.
Despite that, the proportions for the foreground and background are great. Good forms and solid chiaroscuro that lends itself well to this style. I'm going to go ahead and disagree with some others on your choice of a crisp font for the text. I personally feel that it contrasts nicely with the rest of the work in a way that, combined with the orthogonals of the foreground figures' arms, draws the viewers eye around the entire piece.
Summary: For the most part, I liked it. It'll be interesting to see how you continue developing your style.
By James on 28/04/2011
i like it gene, only thing which is a tad weird is the bolt coming outta the c'bow looks abit weird idk if im viewing it wrong other than that great work!
By dog b2 on 30/04/2011
me likey
Back to Topic Index