Back to Topic Index

Motivation

By bobler2 on 21/05/2008
Need motivation to train for wars?


http://www.zybez.net/community/index.php?s...c=1056154&st=40

Read where most people have us coming and also read the example.....

Prove those basterds wrong.

By Robertw56 on 21/05/2008
I expect us to come in the top 3.

Let's do this.

By Pazenon on 21/05/2008
Those people rely on how many members the clans in our division can pull in full outs. Most of them pull 55+ compared to our 45-50, so yeah.

Let's prove them wrong indeed hash.png

By Gusmighster on 21/05/2008
Lets rape these bastards kthxbai

By Zeth007 on 21/05/2008
Let's own them just like that hash.png

By Back to Own on 21/05/2008
We're definitely better now
We have the levels, and the organization

I havent seem them for a while, but im sure we have the numbers

By David on 21/05/2008
I think in matched opts we'll be pretty good because our higher leveled members know what to do, and if we're the ones that pull lower opts, we've got great leaders who can tell us what to do.

Full outs might be a problem because we've declined in our turnouts. We were pulling almost 50 to wars consistently, but now we're pulling fairly consistent 30s. We'll need to pull as many people as we possibly can for these full-outs.

We can do this, but we've got to be top notch in practically every fight.

By Yingyang06 on 21/05/2008
QUOTE (~Euro~)
WG - Can't match the turnouts of the above clans, lacking in organization as well. Could beat clans ranked below, if you get high options, could take the above.


Lets prove them wrong? Kthnxbai

By Karlfischer on 21/05/2008
From what I have seen most people have ranked us third. I actually think that is pretty fair.

As for lacking in organization, I am not sure that assessment is very far off either. We have great organization in matched opts, but it seems to be about the same group of people that fight in matched option fights. In full outs our inexperience from those we have continuously cut in wars I am afraid will show.

By Angus0000 on 21/05/2008
Looks like the projections are all over the place. The only thing we can do is show them all up.

By Kiwi011 on 21/05/2008
QUOTE (Karlfischer @ May 21, 2008 08:37 pm)
From what I have seen most people have ranked us third. I actually think that is pretty fair.

As for lacking in organization, I am not sure that assessment is very far off either. We have great organization in matched opts, but it seems to be about the same group of people that fight in matched option fights. In full outs our inexperience from those we have continuously cut in wars I am afraid will show.

all ive seen are 5-7th.......theres like two 3rd and the rest is 5 and below.

By Karlfischer on 21/05/2008
QUOTE (Kiwi011 @ May 21, 2008 08:47 pm)
QUOTE (Karlfischer @ May 21, 2008 08:37 pm)
From what I have seen most people have ranked us third.  I actually think that is pretty fair. 

As for lacking in organization, I am not sure that assessment is very far off either.  We have great organization in matched opts, but it seems to be about the same group of people that fight in matched option fights.  In full outs our inexperience from those we have continuously cut in wars I am afraid will show.

all ive seen are 5-7th.......theres like two 3rd and the rest is 5 and below.

Regardless, I would rather us be underestimated and surprise people than be overestimated and fall short of expectations.

By pur3laugh on 21/05/2008
Omg.. We so need to own them and prove them wrong. Thanks for the post bobby <3

By George on 21/05/2008
QUOTE
WG - Can't match the turnouts of the above clans, lacking in organization as well. Could beat clans ranked below, if you get high options, could take the above.


That is a pack of lies tbh.
If they think we are organised take a look at our past most recent battles lol

By bobler2 on 21/05/2008
QUOTE (Gorgemaster @ May 21, 2008 09:21 pm)
QUOTE
WG - Can't match the turnouts of the above clans, lacking in organization as well. Could beat clans ranked below, if you get high options, could take the above.


That is a pack of lies tbh.
If they think we are organised take a look at our past most recent battles lol

cmon George....GET ANGERY cussing.gif

By Kiwi011 on 21/05/2008
QUOTE (Gorgemaster @ May 21, 2008 09:21 pm)
QUOTE
WG - Can't match the turnouts of the above clans, lacking in organization as well. Could beat clans ranked below, if you get high options, could take the above.


That is a pack of lies tbh.
If they think we are organised take a look at our past most recent battles lol

those r all no rsc post wars lol.

I am worried about the fullouts....

By Elyxiatic on 21/05/2008
QUOTE (bobler2 @ May 21, 2008 09:28 pm)
QUOTE (Gorgemaster @ May 21, 2008 09:21 pm)
QUOTE
WG - Can't match the turnouts of the above clans, lacking in organization as well. Could beat clans ranked below, if you get high options, could take the above.


That is a pack of lies tbh.
If they think we are organised take a look at our past most recent battles lol

cmon George....GET ANGERY cussing.gif

Vent that frustration george cussing.gif cussing.gif cussing.gif
hash.png

By bobler2 on 21/05/2008
To be honest, matched opts we got covered, pretty much we know we will perform our best there. The fact we'e had numbers cut from wars is good and bad:
- good - it shows we can pull more on shortnotice of 1/2 days, giving us a solid foundation of active people, and more people will sign up now they know they wil fight and not get cut.
- bad - lack of experiacne. Maybe something like a interclan 115- wars a few before we start?

By Tnuac on 21/05/2008
You should merit the bad comments from other people. What karl says is exactly to the point.

QUOTE
Regardless, I would rather us be underestimated and surprise people than be overestimated and fall short of expectations.


Its good that we've been in the dark recently, by withdrawing from RSC posts. RSC think we're declining by not warring, and have crap organisation. This is our chance to exceed expectations.

That means we have to concentrate on doing our best. Success won't come easy, but the rewards are great.

By Yingyang06 on 21/05/2008
QUOTE (Kiwi011 @ May 21, 2008 10:18 pm)
QUOTE (Gorgemaster @ May 21, 2008 09:21 pm)
QUOTE
WG - Can't match the turnouts of the above clans, lacking in organization as well. Could beat clans ranked below, if you get high options, could take the above.


That is a pack of lies tbh.
If they think we are organised take a look at our past most recent battles lol

those r all no rsc post wars lol.

I am worried about the fullouts....

Then we should do more wars with RSC posts. That way people can see how we are doing.

By Kero2 on 22/05/2008
WG - Can't match the turnouts of the above clans, lacking in organization as well. Could beat clans ranked below, if you get high options, could take the above.

Proving this bitch wrong will be fun. This Dark Invoker goes clan wars and mass recruits people so hes a Fag and iv fought him before. Lets do it guys

By Useph1 on 22/05/2008
I was looking at all the clans there and I have 2 questions:

What exactly is the Cwpl and why isn't the clan Damage Inc anywhere on there? I'm not too familiar with the Rs clan world but I was pretty sure DI was somewhere in the top 5.

-----------

Besides that, YES!! Let's train and win.

By bobler2 on 22/05/2008
clan wars league, like football we fight all clans in our league once in a match opts and once in a full out.



By Tnuac on 22/05/2008
QUOTE (Useph1 @ May 22, 2008 05:33 am)
I was looking at all the clans there and I have 2 questions:

What exactly is the Cwpl and why isn't the clan Damage Inc anywhere on there? I'm not too familiar with the Rs clan world but I was pretty sure DI was somewhere in the top 5.

-----------

Besides that, YES!! Let's train and win.

I was about to say they've declined since MB got taken down, but it looks like theyre ranked 5th on RAW.

Guess they just don't want the hassle of it.

By General199 on 22/05/2008
I will be satisfied as long as we do not drop down a division. It will be great to move up in division but right now where we are at is perfect for us. There is good competition and hopefully we prosper because of it.

By Snowzak on 22/05/2008
QUOTE (General199 @ May 22, 2008 02:34 pm)
I will be satisfied as long as we do not drop down a division. It will be great to move up in division but right now where we are at is perfect for us. There is good competition and hopefully we prosper because of it.

I agree with Gen. Most of the clans in our division are around our level, may it be in matched or full outs. We have clans a tad weaker and stronger than us, which is what we want. smile.gif

I'm worried concerning our ability to pull many numbers though, I hope my worries are futile.

By Back to Own on 23/05/2008
Main things we need to work on to suceed:

-Snipers and Anti-snipers. Once these guys are down, our fighting machine is crippled. Tbe showed that to us today. They exposed our reliance on snipers. Once our snipers and antisnipers were down, we were easy targets. They're serve as attackers and defenders. Could be solved by appointing substitute snipers to fill in dead/low offensive snipers.

-Ko's - Many of the people who get cut often are inexperienced. This is probably our weakest point. Tanking practice (with another clan for high opts would be even better), and maybe -115 fights could give the experience.

We've been doing excellent hybriding lately, especially with our snipers.



Back to Topic Index

Developed by Mojo.