Back to Topic Index
Activity Sweep?
By Karel Dude on 22/06/2008
I think its around time we had an activity check/sweep again. We have 130+ members on our memberlist now and it is inaccurately displaying our strength, since we pull less than half of that to wars.
So yeah, please consider
Btw, GIVE US SOME P2P PLEASE we literally haven't had any p2p wars for months now
By Dav 13 on 22/06/2008
Yea a sweep would be nice .. and the p2p maybe
By Randy on 22/06/2008
Agree with both things Karel.
There are some names on the ML I haven't seen before.
And P2p would be a nice change
By Winddancir on 22/06/2008
There are some who have left, and posted a leaving topic, and it's been past the few days, yet they are still on forums and/or memberlist as Trial Guardian/Guardian/whatever.
By Colinwarrior on 22/06/2008
Pulling 57 out of 136 people to a war is a good indicator that we need an inactive sweep.
By Jayson on 22/06/2008
definatly to both
and sweep is good because showing other clans that we pull 60 out of 130 isnt a good thing, but pulling 70-80 shows that we are active
also p2p would be great
By Zeth007 on 22/06/2008
Do it.
By Dalejamesw on 22/06/2008
We'll be working on it.
Btw you was a Raid Leader up until about 3 days ago, why didnt you get P2P if you wanted it? Just something which confused me thats all.
By Mager123789 on 22/06/2008
QUOTE (Dalejamesw @ June 22, 2008 12:04 pm) |
We'll be working on it.
Btw you was a Raid Leader up until about 3 days ago, why didnt you get P2P if you wanted it? Just something which confused me thats all. |
he was f2p for a long time..
By Karel Dude on 22/06/2008
QUOTE (Dalejamesw @ June 22, 2008 12:04 pm) |
We'll be working on it.
Btw you was a Raid Leader up until about 3 days ago, why didnt you get P2P if you wanted it? Just something which confused me thats all. |
My inability to do such things are among reasons that I stepped down. Surely, in the way that you view me, nothing more would have been expected? Surely, you could have seen and addressed such problems much more easily than I would have?
The lack of p2p wars is obvious, anyone who has been here for a few weeks would have seen it. It isn't my fault that no one else has spoke up or noticed this.
By Snowzak on 22/06/2008
A +1 to this post, I think the Council have received a certain PM from me
By Flame5107 on 22/06/2008
yes from what we pulled to the mori an active sweep is needed
~Flamey
By Karlfischer on 22/06/2008
I would give it another week, and make an announcement that if we do not pull over 70 next war, there will be an inactivity sweep.
By Tmal34 on 23/06/2008
QUOTE (Karlfischer @ June 22, 2008 11:45 am) |
I would give it another week, and make an announcement that if we do not pull over 70 next war, there will be an inactivity sweep. |
Make it for this weekends war...we need 70 to beat LPT
By Troll84 on 23/06/2008
QUOTE (Tmal34 @ June 23, 2008 06:38 am) |
QUOTE (Karlfischer @ June 22, 2008 11:45 am) | I would give it another week, and make an announcement that if we do not pull over 70 next war, there will be an inactivity sweep. |
Make it for this weekends war...we need 70 to beat LPT
|
I'm not so sure...
Ltpkteam pulled 73 to their week 2, 60 to their week 3, 46 to their week 4. If that trend continues, we may only have to pull 60 or so, however obviously that could backfire and they could pull 70
As for the activity sweep, i believe this is a good idea as our memberlist is supposed to reflect our capability in wars also, and i don't believe it does this atm.
~Mugger84
By Lee on 23/06/2008
Im alive, dont kick me tbh.
By Reticked on 23/06/2008
To contradict Karel,
DON'T GIVE US ANY P2P ANYTHING EVER
at least until I have members.
By Dorcha3377 on 23/06/2008
P2P would be awesomeness.
By JC on 23/06/2008
QUOTE (Snowzak @ June 23, 2008 03:06 am) |
A +1 to this post, I think the Council have received a certain PM from me |
I read that snow,
Sadly I am not in a position to do anything about it for the next couple of weeks
By pur3laugh on 29/06/2008
might be good for a wake up call for the ones not active.
By Gusmighster on 29/06/2008
Definately needed now, 50 out of 130 is not good
By Troll84 on 29/06/2008
QUOTE (Gusmighster @ June 29, 2008 08:50 am) |
Definately needed now, 50 out of 130 is not good |
+1
By rachellove9 on 29/06/2008
I've been thinking about cleaning my friends list out for the same reason. Alot of wg on there I never see or hear from. I am not the most active member right now for personal reasons but I still manage to have some activity.
Even as inactive as I am I do manage to recruit some new people. Maybe include that as part of the inactivity thing we could use more active members
Thanks to everyone that helps me with recruiting too. I'm better at getting them interested than telling them what to do. <33333
By WG_Aaron on 30/06/2008
I hosted a P2P war against i forget who way back when.
Didn't go to well.
Back to Topic Index