Back to Topic Index
QUOTE (His Lordship @ June 22, 2008 01:45 pm) |
Its not me vs him Mike. It's him vs like a dozen members. This is only going to get bigger and worse. |
QUOTE (His Lordship @ June 22, 2008 01:45 pm) |
Its not me vs him Mike. It's him vs like a dozen members. This is only going to get bigger and worse. |
QUOTE |
[ 20:04:48 ] Crucio01: buzz [ 20:04:50 ] Crucio01: what did i do to them!! [ 20:04:56 ] Crucio01: they made me cry |
QUOTE |
[ 18:48:29 ] +Crucio01: i'd llaugh soo much if i beat eugene in 99 att [ 18:48:47 ] ::: Mode: His_Lordship sets (+b *!*@Swift-F83EE37C.dsl.bell.ca) [ 18:48:47 ] ::: Kick: Crucio01 was kicked by His_Lordship (Just fuck off) |
QUOTE |
[ 18:49:53 ] +Crucio01: eugene [ 18:49:57 ] +Crucio01: why did u kick me =[ [ 18:49:59 ] ::: Action: *Crucio01 cries. [ 18:50:00 ] @His_Lordship: ok [ 18:50:03 ] @His_Lordship: you spoke to me [ 18:50:06 ] @His_Lordship: i'm banning you from wg |
QUOTE |
[ 18:51:27 ] @His_Lordship: how old are you? [ 18:51:35 ] +Crucio01: dale [ 18:51:40 ] +Crucio01: tell him that i cant tell him my age [ 18:51:44 ] +Crucio01: cos tht wuld be talking |
QUOTE (Tnuac @ June 22, 2008 01:39 pm) |
Kiwi. you said 'READ POST FIRST FFS', but the post is just your opinion, and its biased. If you're going to make a topic for people to read along with a vote, please do not make it biased, or based on your opinion. Outline brief reasons from either side. That is why leaders should make these sorts of topics, because they are, on average, less bias. By speaking in such a way, it skews the vote. I voted no. There's no rule in the clan requiring a certain level of maturity, or an age. Sure, you play it by ear and ban them if needs be, but I don't see any grounds to ban him. The only thing he's done (that I have yet seen - please give something else if there is anything) is obtained a bad relationship with lordy. He acts immature, then gets openly bullied and insulted. I'll take a rule straight from the clan site: "If a person offends you, and you insult them back, you will both be punished regardless of who started it." The bullying of crucio has gone far past that rule, and we've turned a blind eye to it. Its very easy to be biased and say get rid of him, but we're bending the rules and performing a witch hunt. Witch hunting is what made a mess back in 2007, let's not do it again. We want WG to be an accomodating clan. Providing crucio ignores lordy (and me and buzz, at least, will come down hard on crucio if he tries to communicate with lordy in any way), that should be the end of it. He shouldn't cause drama providing no one backs him into a corner. He is not what I call 'malelovant', he doesn't start fights for the sake of it, he's just slightly childlike at times. Let's keep up what we call the friendly atmosphere, and not point the finger. My opinion, take it or leave it. |
QUOTE (Buzzard1985 @ June 22, 2008 03:31 pm) | ||||||||
I voted no, most of you already know where I stand on this from seeing IRC.
People do have feelings, just because he annoys you doesn't mean he annoys everyone else. In all honesty I'm getting annoyed at the fact that you keep going at him. Your reason for kicking him yesterday was absolutely bullshit.
You know, the funny thing is I'd laugh too if he beat you in 99 attack, and I'm sure a hell of a lot of other people would too.
You gave him 1 last chance and he thought you were talking to him (because thats probably all he wants).
|
QUOTE (Ranma344 @ June 22, 2008 05:35 pm) |
*Looks at his 40% warn* Yes... And mike... I wouldn't have this warn level for flaming him if he hadn't annoyed me directly.... |
QUOTE (Tnuac @ June 22, 2008 01:39 pm) |
Kiwi. you said 'READ POST FIRST FFS', but the post is just your opinion, and its biased. If you're going to make a topic for people to read along with a vote, please do not make it biased, or based on your opinion. Outline brief reasons from either side. That is why leaders should make these sorts of topics, because they are, on average, less bias. By speaking in such a way, it skews the vote. I voted no. There's no rule in the clan requiring a certain level of maturity, or an age. Sure, you play it by ear and ban them if needs be, but I don't see any grounds to ban him. The only thing he's done (that I have yet seen - please give something else if there is anything) is obtained a bad relationship with lordy. He acts immature, then gets openly bullied and insulted. I'll take a rule straight from the clan site: "If a person offends you, and you insult them back, you will both be punished regardless of who started it." The bullying of crucio has gone far past that rule, and we've turned a blind eye to it. Its very easy to be biased and say get rid of him, but we're bending the rules and performing a witch hunt. Witch hunting is what made a mess back in 2007, let's not do it again. We want WG to be an accomodating clan. Providing crucio ignores lordy (and me and buzz, at least, will come down hard on crucio if he tries to communicate with lordy in any way), that should be the end of it. He shouldn't cause drama providing no one backs him into a corner. He is not what I call 'malelovant', he doesn't start fights for the sake of it, he's just slightly childlike at times. Let's keep up what we call the friendly atmosphere, and not point the finger. My opinion, take it or leave it. |
QUOTE (Tnuac @ June 22, 2008 07:48 pm) |
Please, if you're going to referr to specific IRC events, supply logs for them. Especially where 2 people are concerned. (Preferably condensed logs) Its much more fair to decide from the primary evidence (chat logs, pictures) than the secondary evidence (someone's elses interpretation of the event), however secure the secondary evidence is likely to be. |
QUOTE (Parth23 Jani @ June 22, 2008 10:01 pm) |
He got banned(unfairly) already didn't he? Even if all this does get him unbanned I doubt he'd want to come back. Kiwi , of facking course he spammed. He beat some one higher combat than him who challenged him and said he had no chance. That doesn't say that he's immature, just excited. I'm not saying he isn't immature , but saying he is just based on that IRC incident is a load of bollocks. Spantrax , if anyone , was being immature. You were actually in IRC then and you even told him to stop. How did you end up wanting to get crucio banned? |
QUOTE |
[20:47:27] <[spanthrax]> HE SWITCHES RULES AND SHIT ^ Now you didn't highlight this sentence did you. |
QUOTE |
I would do so too, but he spammed for quite a long time, definitewly excessively, and even though Mike has cut it out above you can see from what Joe said I had asked them both to stop. |
QUOTE (Tmal34 @ June 22, 2008 11:44 pm) |
Guys my advice is to accept council's decision, which based on Evil's post it is, and just move on. All of you are big for standing up for what's right and that is great. However council has chosen to let him stay banned and none of you were friends with him anyways. The fact is that it is no big loss to WG unless we turn it into one. Move on, be done with it. |
QUOTE (Theevildead2 @ June 22, 2008 11:59 pm) | ||
Lol, I was not involved at all in the decision to kick him, I have been away for the last few days (look in inactivity forum). I did not even know crucio was banned untill I read this thread this morning and the oppinions posted above are my own, I did not participate in any discussion about wether crucio should be banned or not. Hopefully you will get a hall of shame post later today to explain why this has happened. Lastly of all, and I will say this every time someone is suspended or banned: Do not assume you have the full story or understanding of why he was banned, even I don't assume that, but be prepared that there is some stuff we will not tell you about a member that will have contributed towards their warn/suspension/kick/ban. |
QUOTE (Karlfischer @ June 23, 2008 08:47 pm) |
...why even bother to have rules when bans are totally arbitrary? ![]() |
QUOTE (Tnuac @ June 22, 2008 08:56 pm) |
[20:20:36] <JonSauce> its over [20:20:42] <JoeSauce> its over [20:20:44] <JonSauce> crucio casn i duel u |
Back to Topic Index