Back to Topic Index

Freedom of speech in wg..

By Elyxiatic on 15/08/2008
We don't get freedom of speech.
Power hungry mods keep editing posts and such.
I've seen it happen to other people too.

How about you just stop it you mods?
I'm sick of it, I've literally had enough of those people who can edit posts.
Like its getting to a point where its members vs mods in wg.
Just let us have our say.

Just because we don't agree with your view, doesn't mean you have to edit out our posts or delete them.

I can have a go at a fellow member, for posting something I don't agree with.
Doesn't mean you mods have to edit it out.
I actually thought the only things that should be edited out are those things which attract warn lvls.
I have yet to receive a warn lvl in wg, but yet have had my posts edited out countless times.

If you're going to edit so much....
Why don't you tell us what to post then?
Like literally give us a transcript of what we 'should' post.


By Mistah Vince on 15/08/2008
I totally agree with you Maths. Though it hasn't really happened to myself many times, I do see it happening often. hash.png

By Kingrascal31 on 15/08/2008
I agree, though as you can see, I dont post much... lol, but I do think its unfair, and happening quite a bit.

By Sithofwookie on 15/08/2008
I totally agree with this maths but to lighten the mood i would like to show you all that Vince can actually love...

user posted image

By Troll84 on 15/08/2008
Can't personally say I've seen this happening. I personally only edit out someone's post if I'm asked to do so by the author of the post, or if the post is a definate flame bait/flame directed towards a fellow member. neko2.gif

Imo this should be in PM to the editor in question & in a security forum rather than rants, but I suppose this fits the description of the forum neko2.gif

EDIT: Unless they're the slideshow of me doing naughty things hash.png THAT I get angry about :@

~Mugger84

By Mistah Vince on 15/08/2008
QUOTE (Sithofwookie @ August 14, 2008 10:36 pm)
I totally agree with this maths but to lighten the mood i would like to show you all that Vince can actually love...

user posted image

It's a lie. I don't have emotions. Emotions are a sign of weakness.

By Kiwi011 on 15/08/2008
agreed, i think ive had like 5 posts in the last 2 weeks edited/deleted.

By Sithofwookie on 15/08/2008
QUOTE (Pbplayer9 @ August 14, 2008 10:37 pm)
QUOTE (Sithofwookie @ August 14, 2008 10:36 pm)
I totally agree with this maths but to lighten the mood i would like to show you all that Vince can actually love...

user posted image

It's a lie. I don't have emotions. Emotions are a sign of weakness.

im srry that i had to be the one to break it to the world

By Randy on 15/08/2008
I agree Maths, but you must know that most of the time posts are edited because they may be offensive, inapropriate, or extremely negative. More slack should be given, but not too much.

By Eregion2 on 15/08/2008
Cutting back on it a bit would be a good thing, but at the same time they are doing their jobs. I'd prefer more of a responsibility system: if a moderator edits or deletes a post they have to document the original post and send a PM to someone higher up (council, or select forum moderators chosen in advance). They take a look and if the action is "approved" they forward the PM (with a note) to the person who originally made the post.

1. This means moderators are being moderated.
2. Everyone is accountable; their names and actions are documented and reasoning presented.
3. If they don't think the edit/deletion is worth their time then they shouldn't be doing it in the first place.

Rather than PMs this could be done on a moderator-specific forum page as well, with a new thread for each issue marked in the title: [Pending] and [Validated]. For large-scale issues a single thread could cover several posts made within the original thread being cleaned up. Example:

QUOTE
So-and-So PM'd me about this topic:
QUOTE
Blah Blah Blah ... This thread sucks ... Blah Blah Blah
I edited/deleted the post (or replaced it with such-and-such) and it needs validating.
Then it gets validated, and a PM is sent to the poster. It won't take nearly as much time as it sounds tbh. This is pretty much how things work on a fansite forum I've been a moderator of for like a year now and it works really well. And just to be polite, if you move or hide a thread PLEASE let the person who made it know. I had this happen to me on our boards about a year ago and it really pissed me off after I spent like three hours writing a very expressive post just to have it disappear. angryhahs.gif.png

By Karel Dude on 15/08/2008
I've had posts edits out as well, at least we could get a warning or explanation of what was happening.

By Mistah Vince on 15/08/2008
QUOTE (Eregion2 @ August 14, 2008 11:47 pm)
Cutting back on it a bit would be a good thing, but at the same time they are doing their jobs. I'd prefer more of a responsibility system: if a moderator edits or deletes a post they have to document the original post and send a PM to someone higher up (council, or select forum moderators chosen in advance). They take a look and if the action is "approved" they forward the PM (with a note) to the person who originally made the post.

1. This means moderators are being moderated.
2. Everyone is accountable; their names and actions are documented and reasoning presented.
3. If they don't think the edit/deletion is worth their time then they shouldn't be doing it in the first place.

Rather than PMs this could be done on a moderator-specific forum page as well, with a new thread for each issue marked in the title: [Pending] and [Validated]. For large-scale issues a single thread could cover several posts made within the original thread being cleaned up. Example:

QUOTE
So-and-So PM'd me about this topic:
QUOTE
Blah Blah Blah ... This thread sucks ... Blah Blah Blah
I edited/deleted the post (or replaced it with such-and-such) and it needs validating.
Then it gets validated, and a PM is sent to the poster. It won't take nearly as much time as it sounds tbh. This is pretty much how things work on a fansite forum I've been a moderator of for like a year now and it works really well. And just to be polite, if you move or hide a thread PLEASE let the person who made it know. I had this happen to me on our boards about a year ago and it really pissed me off after I spent like three hours writing a very expressive post just to have it disappear. angryhahs.gif.png

That's an extremely good idea. Wayne ftw. hash.png

By JC on 15/08/2008
I can't recall the last time I edited someone elses post....

Actually I can, it was a poll posted by mugger and I edited naughty picshash.png

but I dont really think this is directed at me....

By Jayson on 15/08/2008
i have freedom of speech to tell you no u

and well, mod can take things too far, but they do need to do it

By rachellove9 on 15/08/2008
QUOTE (Pbplayer9 @ August 15, 2008 12:21 am)
QUOTE (Eregion2 @ August 14, 2008 11:47 pm)
Cutting back on it a bit would be a good thing, but at the same time they are doing their jobs. I'd prefer more of a responsibility system: if a moderator edits or deletes a post they have to document the original post and send a PM to someone higher up (council, or select forum moderators chosen in advance). They take a look and if the action is "approved" they forward the PM (with a note) to the person who originally made the post.

1. This means moderators are being moderated.
2. Everyone is accountable; their names and actions are documented and reasoning presented.
3. If they don't think the edit/deletion is worth their time then they shouldn't be doing it in the first place.

Rather than PMs this could be done on a moderator-specific forum page as well, with a new thread for each issue marked in the title: [Pending] and [Validated]. For large-scale issues a single thread could cover several posts made within the original thread being cleaned up. Example:

QUOTE
So-and-So PM'd me about this topic:
QUOTE
Blah Blah Blah ... This thread sucks ... Blah Blah Blah
I edited/deleted the post (or replaced it with such-and-such) and it needs validating.
Then it gets validated, and a PM is sent to the poster. It won't take nearly as much time as it sounds tbh. This is pretty much how things work on a fansite forum I've been a moderator of for like a year now and it works really well. And just to be polite, if you move or hide a thread PLEASE let the person who made it know. I had this happen to me on our boards about a year ago and it really pissed me off after I spent like three hours writing a very expressive post just to have it disappear. angryhahs.gif.png

That's an extremely good idea. Wayne ftw. hash.png

I'm not sure about this method, but I hope council looks at it.

TBH I've seen posts locked that had no flaming in them and only expressed how people felt. When alot of people seem to be expressing negatively about a WG member, leaders could do a 24 hour lock like I saw Abs do. Then maybe talk to the person that is upsetting everyone. Uncover what is happening and try to help the person involved. Sometimes getting to the core of the problem is better than simply covering it up.

Freedom of Speech is a great right to us in the United States. People fight wars over this very type of issue. Mods are doing what they see to be a good thing. We have a large range of ages and backgrounds within the clan. What one of us might laugh at, someone else will be offended.

By Troll84 on 15/08/2008
QUOTE (Eregion2 @ August 15, 2008 05:47 am)
Cutting back on it a bit would be a good thing, but at the same time they are doing their jobs. I'd prefer more of a responsibility system: if a moderator edits or deletes a post they have to document the original post and send a PM to someone higher up (council, or select forum moderators chosen in advance). They take a look and if the action is "approved" they forward the PM (with a note) to the person who originally made the post.

1. This means moderators are being moderated.
2. Everyone is accountable; their names and actions are documented and reasoning presented.
3. If they don't think the edit/deletion is worth their time then they shouldn't be doing it in the first place.

Rather than PMs this could be done on a moderator-specific forum page as well, with a new thread for each issue marked in the title: [Pending] and [Validated]. For large-scale issues a single thread could cover several posts made within the original thread being cleaned up. Example:

QUOTE
So-and-So PM'd me about this topic:
QUOTE
Blah Blah Blah ... This thread sucks ... Blah Blah Blah
I edited/deleted the post (or replaced it with such-and-such) and it needs validating.
Then it gets validated, and a PM is sent to the poster. It won't take nearly as much time as it sounds tbh. This is pretty much how things work on a fansite forum I've been a moderator of for like a year now and it works really well. And just to be polite, if you move or hide a thread PLEASE let the person who made it know. I had this happen to me on our boards about a year ago and it really pissed me off after I spent like three hours writing a very expressive post just to have it disappear. angryhahs.gif.png

Sounds like another way of dumping a boatload of work onto an already very depleated council. In my opinion it's not an idea that should be carried forwards. Instead, the focus of the improvements should be on the moderators themselves. The moderators must from this post take away the knowledge that editing member's posts when they are not deserved of being edited is wrong. Obviously different mods take different things as being offensive, so obviously there will never be a 'set' action to take for someone's post. Instead, every case is taken differently and appropriate action is taken.

~Mugger84

By Back to Own on 15/08/2008
I cant say this has really been happening. We'll edit posts if needed if its some sort of heavy flame towards another member that can cause trouble.

Everyone in WG has freedom of speech up to a point

By Zlatan83 on 15/08/2008
Theres freedom of speech, then there is being an idiot and flame/flamebait everything breathing.

By Eregion2 on 15/08/2008
QUOTE (Mugger84)
The moderators must from this post take away the knowledge that editing member's posts when they are not deserved of being edited is wrong. Obviously different mods take different things as being offensive, so obviously there will never be a 'set' action to take for someone's post. Instead, every case is taken differently and appropriate action is taken.

~Mugger84
This has been brought up before and that's what we did, and eh ... we're here again. rolleyes.gif

By Tnuac on 15/08/2008
Yes, I agree.

And zlaran

By Troll84 on 15/08/2008
QUOTE (Eregion2 @ August 15, 2008 04:33 pm)
QUOTE (Mugger84)
The moderators must from this post take away the knowledge that editing member's posts when they are not deserved of being edited is wrong. Obviously different mods take different things as being offensive, so obviously there will never be a 'set' action to take for someone's post. Instead, every case is taken differently and appropriate action is taken.

~Mugger84
This has been brought up before and that's what we did, and eh ... we're here again. rolleyes.gif

How long ago? Long enough for a newer generation of tertiaries to be in 'office'? tongue.gif If so, then it worked the first time, and so will work the second time,.

Tbh i agree with BTO, I haven't seen this happening unless the member who's post is being edited is simply posting what they're posting to go out and hurt another member.

~Mugger84

By Eregion2 on 15/08/2008
No idea, I just remember it coming up last September before I left for like a year. rolleyes.gif

By rachellove9 on 22/08/2008
I just want to add that I got told to stop debating an issue that one of the staff disagreed with about in IRC. He didn't like my opinion so yesterday the few of us talking about the issue basicly got told to shut up. When we didn't drop the issue but were calmly stating our opinions, it was apparent that he believed that he couldn't trust us to make good decisions. I said yet another thing he didn't like and was threatened with a warn lvl that could not be appealed.

So be careful with what your opinions are in IRC, some staff will not think twice about giving you a warn lvl that can't be appealed as it was told to me. I still disagree with the opinion and actions that were done.

We only have as much freedom of speech as we are allowed. If your seen as someone with an opposing opinion you may become a target.

By His Lordship on 22/08/2008
Its a culture.
Its part of the new "community".
This will go away with time.
If I see it happening the person responsible will be spoken to.

By Rick Hamm on 22/08/2008
Boy, I'm screwed.

Warn levels, here I come!!!

By Eregion2 on 22/08/2008
Rach is too polite, I would have posted names and screenshots and acted very egocentric. hashdown.gif.png

By Dorcha3377 on 25/08/2008
It has become more of an issue when posts disappear without any sort of idea why or for what is going on.



By Havochaha on 25/08/2008
i agree 100 percent. I was googling the freedom of speech speach but i couldnt find it sad.gif

By Mistah Vince on 25/08/2008
QUOTE (Havochaha @ August 24, 2008 08:27 pm)
i agree 100 percent. I was googling the freedom of speech speach but i couldnt find it sad.gif

Just to be an ass Omar...

How'd you manage to spell "speech" correctly the first time but not the second? xD

By His Lordship on 25/08/2008
I don't see it as a problem.
In fact I find its pretty easy for people to say whatever they want.

By Ranma344 on 25/08/2008
Well damn, if anyone should be for this, it should be me... I am the undisputed king of having his posts deleted or edited randomly, for the sole purpose that I speak my mind. Hell just a few hours ago a post of mine was deleted... The post said this, and I quote
QUOTE
Photoshop  dry.gif
. No reason was given for this, yet my post is no where to be found. I personally think that the mods who follow us around deleting and editing our posts when they don't need to be deleted, or edited, should just stop. It's really annoying when you go back later, only to see that your post is no longer there, and the conversation is still going in a direction that is completely the opposite of how it would have turned out had your post been read by those who replied to the thread. I mean if you are going to delete something, can we at least get a reason? And don't give me any of that "We don't owe you an explanation, our word is law" bullshit, because I'm not going to take it anymore.

Oh and I have the contents of this post saved... so if you delete it, I'll just put it back, and make it longer.

By Elyxiatic on 25/08/2008
QUOTE (His Lordship @ August 25, 2008 05:40 pm)
I don't see it as a problem.
In fact I find its pretty easy for people to say whatever they want.

This topic is old.
It was relevant before you came back.
Which was like 1 month ago.

By rachellove9 on 25/08/2008
QUOTE (Mathsnerd18 @ August 25, 2008 03:12 am)
QUOTE (His Lordship @ August 25, 2008 05:40 pm)
I don't see it as a problem.
In fact I find its pretty easy for people to say whatever they want.

This topic is old.
It was relevant before you came back.
Which was like 1 month ago.

+1

I'm glad your back. I may have had to be more like what Fairy described and that would never be the real me.

By Groedius on 25/08/2008
I see you all mention mods and moderator yet i see no actual moderator rank just a bunch of people who have the power to edit posts hash.png

By Tnuac on 25/08/2008
QUOTE (Groedius @ August 25, 2008 05:00 pm)
I see you all mention mods and moderator yet i see no actual moderator rank just a bunch of people who have the power to edit posts hash.png

They still moderate hash.png

By Danltn on 25/08/2008
QUOTE (Groedius @ August 25, 2008 12:00 pm)
I see you all mention mods and moderator yet i see no actual moderator rank just a bunch of people who have the power to edit posts hash.png

It's focused on anyone with the power to edit/change/manipulate others' posts.

Dan

By Dorcha3377 on 25/08/2008
Yes they moderate..just not very well.



Back to Topic Index

Developed by Mojo.