Back to Topic Index
Parth
By His Lordship on 27/09/2008
No arguments.
He's not allowed to attend our events whether or not he is the owner of the account.
He is not allowed in our public IRC.
He is not allowed in our TS.
He is in the hall of shame. That means outcast.
By Pazenon on 27/09/2008
Um why is that? He quit Runescape a very long time ago and gave me his account because Pazenon isn't mine anymore. I've been using him in wars since then.
I know you had a personal vendetta against him, but that doesn't mean you should stop ME from using him account to attend wars. You have every right to ban him from your TS server, your forums, your IRC. But you can't simply stop me from using his account in wars.
By Eregion2 on 27/09/2008
Wait, we're angry that
Eugene is enforcing a Jagex rule? I need to sit down I feel dizzy...
By Rick Hamm on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (Pazenon @ September 26, 2008 09:50 pm) |
Um why is that? He quit Runescape a very long time ago and gave me his account because Pazenon isn't mine anymore. I've been using him in wars since then.
I know you had a personal vendetta against him, but that doesn't mean you should stop ME from using him account to attend wars. You have every right to ban him from your TS server, your forums, your IRC. But you can't simply stop me from using his account in wars. |
You got the account by breaking the rules. If Parth is banned, then he's banned, whether you hold the account or he does...and I personally liked him.
Save everyone the aggravation and use your own account.
And yes, he CAN stop you from using the account in wars. It would be "simply" not allowing you into clan chat when there's a war on.
By Pazenon on 27/09/2008
But that's the thing. He's banned, I'm not. And I already said that I lost Pazenon. I have no other account to use at wars except Parth's.
It's a rare case if you look at the attendees of a WG war and not see someone using someone else's account, it's something that happens between us and the majority are ok with it, it doesn't harm anyone.
By Havochaha on 27/09/2008
oh boy this is gunna be one heated discussion
*sits and grabs some popcorn*
By Randy on 27/09/2008
Ok, I think what Pazenon is trying to say is,
a name is just a name.
Now, it's who is under that name that matters.
Path32 Jani now has nothing to do with Parth23 Jani.
Account selling and scamming is against the rules, but neither has been preformed. If the account has been given righteously as a gift, than he has every right to use it. I do not know the original owner of Parth, but as long as someone trusted is using it then it's ok.
By Eregion2 on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (Pazenon @ September 26, 2008 10:35 pm) |
But that's the thing. He's banned, I'm not. And I already said that I lost Pazenon. I have no other account to use at wars except Parth's. |
Start training?
QUOTE (KingRandy0) |
Account selling and scamming is against the rules, but neither has been preformed. If the account has been given righteously as a gift, than he has every right to use it. I do not know the original owner of Parth, but as long as someone trusted is using it then it's ok. |
And by who's standards?
By David on 27/09/2008
Isn't giving accounts to other people considered account sharing which IS against the rules?
By T Dwag on 27/09/2008
If Pazenon has no other account, I think it's fine that he uses Parth. It's not the person Parth in any way shape or form and Pazenon is in control of the account... He's very war active and I need him at my wars. Please let him use Parth.
Brandon
By David on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (T Dwag @ September 27, 2008 06:13 am) |
If Pazenon has no other account, I think it's fine that he uses Parth. It's not the person Parth in any way shape or form and Pazenon is in control of the account... He's very war active and I need him at my wars. Please let him use Parth.
Brandon |
I think more than anything, its a question of following the rules. We all want Pazenon to be here and fight with us, but at the cost of not being honest players? I don't think so...
By Geoff_Bland on 27/09/2008
Most people break the rules. Get over it. I've seen numerous times when WG have let people use their accounts and not just for wars. I'd be shocked if I found that someone in WG had never broken a rule before.
By David on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (Geoff_Bland @ September 27, 2008 09:11 am) |
Most people break the rules. Get over it. I've seen numerous times when WG have let people use their accounts and not just for wars. I'd be shocked if I found that someone in WG had never broken a rule before. |
"Everybody does it. Just go with it. I've seen other people do it for things that aren't even war related *insert shock and awe here*. I would be surprised to find a law abiding member of WG."
Wasn't making a point, just paraphrasing.
Sounds like a lame argument if you ask me. Everybody does it, so it's alright? Just because "everybody" does something, doesn't make it alright.
If "everybody" started scamming people would you be singing the same tune? "Everybody" would be doing it. Sure scamming is worse than account sharing (I think so, but that is a matter of opinion) but the principle is the same.
By Cameronm123 on 27/09/2008
He came onto Teamspeak for like 5 minutes the other day, had a nice little catch up and stuff, not gonna lie, i miss him.
By Tnuac on 27/09/2008
Personally I don't give a crap about the account sharing rule (when its used short-term, or when one person has quit the game), but that's just me.
But having a name from the wall of shame at a war does make it a bit messy.
By Eregion2 on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (Geoff_Bland @ September 27, 2008 03:11 am) |
Most people break the rules. Get over it. I've seen numerous times when WG have let people use their accounts and not just for wars. I'd be shocked if I found that someone in WG had never broken a rule before. |
My medical license was just revoked. Can I borrow yours? This next surgery is REALLY COOL!
By Pazenon on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (1colonel1 @ September 27, 2008 05:04 am) |
Isn't giving accounts to other people considered account sharing which IS against the rules? |
If that's the argument to be used to stop me from using Parth's account in wars, then everyone who uses an account other than his in WG's wars should be treated the same way. That would be fair, wouldn't it? And mind me, I know a couple of regular people who never use their own accounts in wars, just like me. But just think, by doing that, would you be helping WG? Isn't using a high leveled account considered something to help WG with? If you ask me, I'd say yes. I personally couldn't care less if I broke a Jagex rule which in consequence helped my clan win a war.
QUOTE (Eregion2) |
Start training? |
And who said I'm not? I've been training my level 83 pure F2P account since I lost Pazenon, and when he meets the WG requirements I'll stop using Parth's account and start using mine. I've been talking to the council about that since Snowzak's time, so they should be aware of this situation.
By Geoff_Bland on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (Eregion2 @ September 27, 2008 05:32 am) |
QUOTE (Geoff_Bland @ September 27, 2008 03:11 am) | Most people break the rules. Get over it. I've seen numerous times when WG have let people use their accounts and not just for wars. I'd be shocked if I found that someone in WG had never broken a rule before. |
My medical license was just revoked. Can I borrow yours? This next surgery is REALLY COOL! |
Mine was too. That's why they call me Hitzelsperger.
By Pkerking0 on 27/09/2008
Oh so that wasn't Parth that I saw a while back

I think we should just let Pazenon use Parth's old account.It's better to have one more person then 1 less whether It Is against rs rules
By Eregion2 on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (Pazenon @ September 27, 2008 06:10 am) |
QUOTE (1colonel1 @ September 27, 2008 05:04 am) | Isn't giving accounts to other people considered account sharing which IS against the rules? |
If that's the argument to be used to stop me from using Parth's account in wars, then everyone who uses an account other than his in WG's wars should be treated the same way. That would be fair, wouldn't it? And mind me, I know a couple of regular people who never use their own accounts in wars, just like me. But just think, by doing that, would you be helping WG? Isn't using a high leveled account considered something to help WG with? If you ask me, I'd say yes. I personally couldn't care less if I broke a Jagex rule which in consequence helped my clan win a war.
QUOTE (Eregion2) | Start training? |
And who said I'm not? I've been training my level 83 pure F2P account since I lost Pazenon, and when he meets the WG requirements I'll stop using Parth's account and start using mine. I've been talking to the council about that since Snowzak's time, so they should be aware of this situation.
|
I'd rather flunk a class than cheat, and I'd rather lose a war than account share.
That's just me though, I'm a hardass.
I forget who but I remember at least 2-3 other people in the last few years who have lost their accounts and spent months training another one to meet the clan requirements, and in the mean time did not war (I think). But if it makes a difference I think this should involve ALL account sharing as you said, not just yours.
By David on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (Pazenon @ September 27, 2008 12:10 pm) |
QUOTE (1colonel1 @ September 27, 2008 05:04 am) | Isn't giving accounts to other people considered account sharing which IS against the rules? |
If that's the argument to be used to stop me from using Parth's account in wars, then everyone who uses an account other than his in WG's wars should be treated the same way. That would be fair, wouldn't it? And mind me, I know a couple of regular people who never use their own accounts in wars, just like me. But just think, by doing that, would you be helping WG? Isn't using a high leveled account considered something to help WG with? If you ask me, I'd say yes. I personally couldn't care less if I broke a Jagex rule which in consequence helped my clan win a war.
QUOTE (Eregion2) | Start training? |
And who said I'm not? I've been training my level 83 pure F2P account since I lost Pazenon, and when he meets the WG requirements I'll stop using Parth's account and start using mine. I've been talking to the council about that since Snowzak's time, so they should be aware of this situation.
|
Yes, they should be treated the same way. You're not being picked out. If someone else said they were using another person's account, I'd say the same thing.
I honestly couldn't help but laugh at the second portion of your argument, I'll quote it again:
QUOTE |
But just think, by doing that, would you be helping WG? Isn't using a high leveled account considered something to help WG with? If you ask me, I'd say yes. I personally couldn't care less if I broke a Jagex rule which in consequence helped my clan win a war. |
Sure using a high leveled account is helpful during a war. Sure I want to win every war we go into. Do I want to be a cheater? No.
QUOTE |
I personally couldn't care less if I broke a Jagex rule which in consequence helped my clan win a war. |
Condensed version:
"Winning is everything, rules are meaningless."
And by your "If it helps WG, breaking Jagex rules is alright" mantra, let's start hacking other people's accounts and then BH transfer all the money and items to our accounts.
By Eregion2 on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (1colonel1) |
Condensed version:
"Winning is everything, rules are meaningless."
And by your "If it helps WG, breaking Jagex rules is alright" mantra, let's start hacking other people's accounts and then BH transfer all the money and items to our accounts. |
No way, that'd be NH!
By Zlatan83 on 27/09/2008
LOL, you guys being serious?
Pazenon is a member of WG.
Pazenon uses Parth's account for wars.
If Pazenon wont be allowed to attend on that account then I will share my account with Pazenon and fucking make a rant for every person who gets on diffrent account.
By Geoff_Bland on 27/09/2008
Amen Zlatan83.
Paz should be allowed to war on Parth until his new account meets the requirements. It's the same story with Gus; people such as Andrew and Dilz let him use their account til his new account gets 100 cmb.
By David on 27/09/2008
I'd like to direct some to this URL:
HereI'll quote what I'm talking about specifically:
QUOTE |
Wilderness Guardians Rules
Obey The Runescape Rules
* Doing so gives us a positive reputation in-game * You will not compromise your account or another member's account * JaGeX will not consider our clan a threat to the game if we follow their rules. |
I know that on the page I provided the link for, there is a section of text above the first rule, here it is:
QUOTE |
Below are the rules and policies for WG. You are reminded that this is just a guideline. They set the general rules, but are not laws. You are required to apply the rules using common sense. |
Here is the URL that contains JaGeX's definition of account sharing/trading:
HereThe text I'm referring to is:
QUOTE |
Each account should only be used by ONE person. Account sharing is NOT allowed. You may not sell, transfer or lend your account to anyone else, or permit anyone else to use your account, and you may not accept an account that anybody else offers you. |
Now, seeing as this rule is encompassed in our WG rules, we should abide by it. However taking into account that the rules aren't law (no offense to Eugene), but simply guidelines, I propose we add something to our first clan rule, something like a footnote. This would apply to the "Obey The Runescape Rules" section.
I'm thinking:
QUOTE |
JaGeX rules are rendered moot so long as WG benefits from their being disobeyed. |
Zlat, I like and respect you.
It's just a little odd that we as a clan get more angry over people putting the "Banana Phone" song in the Important Announcements threads than the breaking of not only our clan rules, but JaGeX rules as well.
By Yingyang06 on 27/09/2008
I'm sorry but i agree with Lordy, no matter his account is banned so people cannot use his account at wars.
By rachellove9 on 27/09/2008
I see both sides to this, but really a hall of shame account doesn't belong at our wars. I just makes us look bad. Like we took back someone that was not a good clan mate. For me this issue is not about the Jagex rules as much as it is about reputation.
Wayne was right on everyone of his posts. I agree with him. Account sharing is probably the rule broke most often. Anyone that never let anyone watch their acct at their house or have someone else on it? I'm sure the percentage is low, but that doesn't mean it is not against the rules.
TBH I was most surprised at staff and their comments. I usually respect their views, but this time I would be questioning motive. How important is winning to you? Willing to cheat? Willing to cross our founder's comman sense?
By Groedius on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (Geoff_Bland @ September 27, 2008 01:12 pm) |
Amen Zlatan83.
Paz should be allowed to war on Parth until his new account meets the requirements. It's the same story with Gus; people such as Andrew and Dilz let him use their account til his new account gets 100 cmb. |
Yeah but im not on the WG hall of shame am i and i was the 1 who originally stated it looks bad to have a name on our hall of shame turning up to our wars but no1 listened to me ...
By Geoff_Bland on 27/09/2008
It's only temporarily til Pazenon gets his other account trained.
By Pazenon on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (1colonel1 @ September 27, 2008 12:28 pm) |
I honestly couldn't help but laugh at the second portion of your argument, I'll quote it again:
QUOTE | But just think, by doing that, would you be helping WG? Isn't using a high leveled account considered something to help WG with? If you ask me, I'd say yes. I personally couldn't care less if I broke a Jagex rule which in consequence helped my clan win a war. |
Sure using a high leveled account is helpful during a war. Sure I want to win every war we go into. Do I want to be a cheater? No.
QUOTE | I personally couldn't care less if I broke a Jagex rule which in consequence helped my clan win a war. |
Condensed version:
"Winning is everything, rules are meaningless."
And by your "If it helps WG, breaking Jagex rules is alright" mantra, let's start hacking other people's accounts and then BH transfer all the money and items to our accounts.
|
And how is it considered "cheating" when you use your account in wars? Surely you should've picked up by now that I, and only I, am the one in control of Parth's account, who quit this game more than a year ago? You referred to some Jagex rule in one of your posts, which states that "Each account should only be used by ONE person." Which is basically what you're arguing about here.
You should've read my posts thoroughly and came up with the idea that it's only me who's in control of Parth's account now before quoting some Jagex rule which I'm not breaking. And I myself couldn't help but laugh at the last portion in your post, how could you possibly compare hacking accounts to something like that? Big difference my friend, big difference.
By His Lordship on 27/09/2008
Pazenon we will speak in private.
By Dilz621 on 27/09/2008
The question here is that if Paz isn't allowed to use Parths acc, then is Gus allowed to use mine at wars?
You need to take into account that:
1) I am not in the hall of shame
2) It helps in wars when I cannot make it.
By Troll84 on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (Kingrandy0 @ September 27, 2008 04:45 am) |
Ok, I think what Pazenon is trying to say is, a name is just a name.
Now, it's who is under that name that matters. Path32 Jani now has nothing to do with Parth23 Jani.
Account selling and scamming is against the rules, but neither has been preformed. If the account has been given righteously as a gift, than he has every right to use it. I do not know the original owner of Parth, but as long as someone trusted is using it then it's ok. |
+1
By David on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (Pazenon @ September 27, 2008 04:50 pm) |
QUOTE (1colonel1 @ September 27, 2008 12:28 pm) | I honestly couldn't help but laugh at the second portion of your argument, I'll quote it again:
QUOTE | But just think, by doing that, would you be helping WG? Isn't using a high leveled account considered something to help WG with? If you ask me, I'd say yes. I personally couldn't care less if I broke a Jagex rule which in consequence helped my clan win a war. |
Sure using a high leveled account is helpful during a war. Sure I want to win every war we go into. Do I want to be a cheater? No.
QUOTE | I personally couldn't care less if I broke a Jagex rule which in consequence helped my clan win a war. |
Condensed version:
"Winning is everything, rules are meaningless."
And by your "If it helps WG, breaking Jagex rules is alright" mantra, let's start hacking other people's accounts and then BH transfer all the money and items to our accounts.
|
And how is it considered "cheating" when you use your account in wars? Surely you should've picked up by now that I, and only I, am the one in control of Parth's account, who quit this game more than a year ago? You referred to some Jagex rule in one of your posts, which states that "Each account should only be used by ONE person." Which is basically what you're arguing about here.
You should've read my posts thoroughly and came up with the idea that it's only me who's in control of Parth's account now before quoting some Jagex rule which I'm not breaking. And I myself couldn't help but laugh at the last portion in your post, how could you possibly compare hacking accounts to something like that? Big difference my friend, big difference.
|
Surely you could have read this little snippet:
QUOTE |
You may not sell, transfer or lend your account to anyone else |
Parth23 Jani originally belonged to the person who created it. He then transferred it to you.
QUOTE |
You may NOT sell, TRANSFER or lend your account to anyone else |
It's a matter of principle. You brought in the whole idea that using another person's account is for the better of WG. Hacking some rich person and giving the money to our members also benefits WG. You obviously didn't pick up on the face I wasn't saying they were the same thing, but that based on your mantra:
QUOTE |
If it benefits WG, it's alright. |
Hacking and transferring items should be alright.
The principle of the act is the same.
I'll lay it out side by side:
Situation we're dealing with:
You are using Parth23 Jani, an account you recieved from another person.
You're breaking WG rules and JaGeX rules.
You're arguing that it's alright because it's not a big deal, and it benefits WG.
My hypothetical situation based on your mantra:
We hack rich people and transfer their items to our accounts.
We're breaking WG rules and JaGeX rules.
I'm arguing, that based on your philosophy, this should be alright because it benefits WG.
The use of an extreme case is to show that what you're doing could be applied to other, more serious things, where people could say:
QUOTE |
It's making WG better isn't it? |
By Rick Hamm on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (Zlatan83 @ September 27, 2008 07:37 am) |
LOL, you guys being serious?
Pazenon is a member of WG. Pazenon uses Parth's account for wars.
If Pazenon wont be allowed to attend on that account then I will share my account with Pazenon and fucking make a rant for every person who gets on diffrent account. |
You said it right there.
PAZENON is in WG. PARTH isn't. Therefore, it would seem to me that he should be on HIS account (Pazenon) and not any other. One person isn't going to win or lose a war, contrary to popular opinion.
I say if Parth is in the Hall of Shame, that's where he stays.
I swear, if I go to another war and see Parth or Zlatan there, I WILL report them for account sharing. No ifs, ands, or buts about it. I have nothing to lose, are you sure you want to lose yours?
Majority of people in this clan play with their own account, an account that they're proud of, an account that they worked hard leveling. What you're doing is smacking each of them in the face by using an account that you did little or no work to level.
There are quite a few people who posted on this thread that I'm very disappointed in. Colonel and Wayne, I'm with you 100%.
By Buzzard1985 on 27/09/2008
Rick that would be extremely low if you reported your own clan.
Now on a different note, leaders of this clan have lent out accounts for wars. I have been asked in the past to share my account.. I think it's acceptable for Paz to use Parth's account for wars, after all, as it's already been said Paz is Paz, not parth.
Ban parth, but don't stop Paz from using his account there's been no problem with it and if you report him I will have no respect for anyone who does.
By Rick Hamm on 27/09/2008
QUOTE (Buzzard1985 @ September 27, 2008 06:25 pm) |
Rick that would be extremely low if you reported your own clan.
Now on a different note, leaders of this clan have lent out accounts for wars. I have been asked in the past to share my account.. I think it's acceptable for Paz to use Parth's account for wars, after all, as it's already been said Paz is Paz, not parth.
Ban parth, but don't stop Paz from using his account there's been no problem with it and if you report him I will have no respect for anyone who does. |
They're breaking the rules and continue to do it just so we can MAYBE win a war? Who's more shallow...the person who reports wrongdoing or the person who is breaking the rules and KNOWS they're doing it? Besides, Parth isn't a clanmate, now is he? I wouldn't technically be reporting a clanmate now would I?
TBH, I don't care what anyone thinks. I told you what I'd do and I plan to stick to that. Someone has to do it because if I don't, it's going to keep on getting worse. Well, maybe I won't report it to Jagex, maybe just make a topic on RSC and see how the other clans like it? I wouldn't go to that extreme to cause embarrassment to WG, however, if it gets out that we're allowing account sharers to our clan for war purposes only, we'll get crucified.
So why not just disallow these sort of things now before it gets out of hand?
I don't care about losing respect for doing what I feel and know is right.
By Buzzard1985 on 28/09/2008
QUOTE (Rick Hamm @ September 27, 2008 06:34 pm) |
QUOTE (Buzzard1985 @ September 27, 2008 06:25 pm) | Rick that would be extremely low if you reported your own clan.
Now on a different note, leaders of this clan have lent out accounts for wars. I have been asked in the past to share my account.. I think it's acceptable for Paz to use Parth's account for wars, after all, as it's already been said Paz is Paz, not parth.
Ban parth, but don't stop Paz from using his account there's been no problem with it and if you report him I will have no respect for anyone who does. |
They're breaking the rules and continue to do it just so we can MAYBE win a war? Who's more shallow...the person who reports wrongdoing or the person who is breaking the rules and KNOWS they're doing it? Besides, Parth isn't a clanmate, now is he? I wouldn't technically be reporting a clanmate now would I?
TBH, I don't care what anyone thinks. I told you what I'd do and I plan to stick to that. Someone has to do it because if I don't, it's going to keep on getting worse. Well, maybe I won't report it to Jagex, maybe just make a topic on RSC and see how the other clans like it? I wouldn't go to that extreme to cause embarrassment to WG, however, if it gets out that we're allowing account sharers to our clan for war purposes only, we'll get crucified.
So why not just disallow these sort of things now before it gets out of hand?
I don't care about losing respect for doing what I feel and know is right.
|
Rick, it's a game, if you want to waste your time worrying about people using other peoples accounts while the person using the accounts (for wars) trains their own account up to requirements then be my guest. But I honestly think you have better things to do with you life than to do that.
By Eregion2 on 28/09/2008
From the previous topic on RuneScape rules, I think we pretty much came to the conclusion that there are 1) rules that are between players and Jagex, and 2) rules that impact the entire clan due to the actions of even a single member. Whether you're for or against account sharing, this is definitely a number two.
Because of that, the clan has to come to a decision concerning the rule and how it will be upheld. And that means Eugene's word is law (given room for fair debate and criticism). Most irresponsible behavior doesn't fall under the clan purview, but this does, and a decision has been made. We can debate it, but you can't question Eugene's right to make the decision the way he has.
So, debate, sure. But don't expect this to be decided by majority vote.
By Pazenon on 28/09/2008
Rick, I still don't understand why you cherish the Jagex rules to that extent. There would be absolutely no point in arguing with you. Think what you want to think, and I'll do the same.
I really hope that what you said about reporting your clanmates for account sharing isn't true, but I swear, I wouldn't give a damn if you did it to me. I'm not sharing this account with any other person. So do whatever makes you happy.
By Rick Hamm on 28/09/2008
Paze, have you read Jagex rules? I'm sure it's been posted here already that while you may not be guilty of account sharing, it's still the fact that you have Parth's account and that it was GIVEN to you illegally.
You may not sell, TRANSFER, or lend your account to anyone else. Parth's account was transferred to you, therefore, making it against the rules. Sugarcoat it all you want, you're still guilty.
Oh, and it's true...reminding you that you've been warned. What you do now is up to you.
Buzz, it's the principle of it and the fact that these kids think they can do what they want anytime they want because there will be no recourse. If I have to make an example out of someone, then so be it. I'd rather it not come to that, but if it does, I'll be more than happy to oblige. Maybe he should spend his time working on his own character instead of using someone elses for something as meaningless as a war. You're right, it's a game, but a game that a majority of people play by the rules...why should some not have to?
By Pazenon on 28/09/2008
I already made it clear that I am training an account to make it reach the WG requirements, doing it whenever I am online.
Just leave it as it is, because I can assure you that whatever you say on this topic wouldn't be the reason for me to stop using Parth. I still don't see the point of the ignorance you naturally have when you expect everything to be done the way you want to be done, it's like you think you're never wrong in a debate because, after all, every other person in WG is a "kid" like you just said.
Maybe it should be looked at the other way around.
By Buzzard1985 on 28/09/2008
QUOTE (Rick Hamm @ September 27, 2008 09:36 pm) |
Buzz, it's the principle of it and the fact that these kids think they can do what they want anytime they want because there will be no recourse. If I have to make an example out of someone, then so be it. I'd rather it not come to that, but if it does, I'll be more than happy to oblige. Maybe he should spend his time working on his own character instead of using someone elses for something as meaningless as a war. You're right, it's a game, but a game that a majority of people play by the rules...why should some not have to? |
Their using Parth for wars only, and they are training another account for WG's requirements, why can't you just forget it :s..
By Yingyang06 on 28/09/2008
This is getting beyond a joke. Let me get this straight, they use Parth's account because THEIR Account is shit? Looks like no one read's these post's Lordy.
I hate parth, so naturally i don't want to see his account at a War after everything he did and said to me. Just by looking at a name can remind plenty of people about the past, and i would rather not remember that past.
4 lines down -
http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/1708/kkk6dg1.jpg By His Lordship on 28/09/2008
I gave him permission myself.
Pazenon has assured me William has no access to Parth23 Jani.
So the account is 100% Pazenon's and therefore safe.
By Rick Hamm on 28/09/2008
Well Gene, you've made your decision which, in turn, has made mine.
So we're going to turn a blind eye to rulebreakers only when it helps the clan win wars. How nice.
By His Lordship on 28/09/2008
Don't be so patronizing.
I consider it to be rude.
By Kiwi011 on 28/09/2008
since when has wg ever followed wg rules rick? Have of wg gets there member ship paid by other members in wg lul.
Chillax.
By His Lordship on 28/09/2008
I will post the official stance of the leadership in an IA shortly.
Back to Topic Index