By Randy on 20/01/2009
18:11:12) <Stokenut> Bitchy110 removed Aardvarks warn level to spite me. Mind removing mine too?
(18:16:40) <[Randy]> What
(18:17:02) <[Randy]> Lordy's warn?
(18:19:21) <Stokenut> Ya
(18:20:06) <[Randy]> That's the only reason jess did that?
(18:20:15) <[Randy]> It was on the 16th..
(18:21:04) <Stokenut> Yep she told me so. We had an argument and she removed his warn level, told me about it yesterday when we started talking again. She said she'd remove mine too but obviously hasn't happened since i expressed my disgust at how idiotic her decision to drop me, and almost drop dz was this afternoon
(18:22:51) <[Randy]> Kk
(18:23:12) <Stokenut> She's such a biased idiot, seriously. You don't drop maxed range/melee at a matched opts range/melee fight. She kept rangers above me that weren't even 99 range. Stupid fucking woman wouldn't have even managed to scrape her way into raid leader had i not been holding her and and telling her who to make fights with, when and what rules to set while giving her analysis of her performances after each event. Ungrateful bitch /rant
(18:23:52) <Stokenut> Okay i've vented now
(18:23:55) * Stokenut wanders off
(18:24:34) <[Randy]> I think i'm just going to suggest to the council that tertiaries shouldn't be allowed to remove warns anymore
(18:25:12) <Stokenut> Tertiaries should be able to give out warn levels
(18:25:35) <Stokenut> Taking away should be allowed if they gave the warn level. If the warn was given by a council member/lordy then it can only be removed by said rank.
(18:25:51) <[Randy]> basically, yea
That's about it. Taking away should be allowed if they gave the warn level. If the warn was given by a council member/lordy then it can only be removed by said rank.
yes/no?
By His Lordship on 21/01/2009
I think we should have the flexibility to remove other peoples warns, but we should come to some general agreement.
Just say 1 month of good behaviour.