Back to Topic Index
Small Change to Banning
By His Lordship on 14/02/2009
From now on bans are permanent and non-negotiable.
The ban has lost its power because people feel they can overcome them.
This will be absolutely stringent.
Should I ever override a FAIR ban, may I be stripped of all my power, and may my fingers rot and fall off my hands.
The ban has lost its power because people feel they can overcome them.
This will be absolutely stringent.
Should I ever override a FAIR ban, may I be stripped of all my power, and may my fingers rot and fall off my hands.
By Kyle on 14/02/2009
Affirmative
By Nick on 14/02/2009
Sweet. Now people are banned.
Maybe people will now take you and their words more seriously.
Maybe people will now take you and their words more seriously.
By Pyro Blade26 on 14/02/2009
Risk your penis and I will take this more seriously. I know I would rather lose my fingers than my penis.
By Robertw56 on 14/02/2009
Uhhhh /me looks around, yes I agree with this ofcourse 
.
. By Colinwarrior on 14/02/2009
What if we ban YOU??
Lol
Lol
By Sithofwookie on 14/02/2009
Well this settles the Rick Hamm coming back dispute.
By spanthrax on 14/02/2009
100% agree with this. a ban is a called a ban for a reason. taking them back does as you pointed out question the authority of our leaders. this adds more credibility to the leaders of this clan and i love the update. just hope i never end up with a welt from the ban stick.
~Spanthrax
~Spanthrax
By His Lordship on 14/02/2009
| QUOTE (Pyro Blade26 @ February 14, 2009 05:09 am) |
| Risk your penis and I will take this more seriously. I know I would rather lose my fingers than my penis. |
I'll risk my right testicle.
I'm a bit fonder of my left one since it hangs lower.
By George on 14/02/2009
OKEY!
By NightRawrs on 14/02/2009
*Sighs* Shame we hadn't thought of this earlyier 
By Lee on 14/02/2009
| QUOTE (Robertw56 @ February 14, 2009 12:10 am) |
| Uhhhh /me looks around, yes I agree with this ofcourse . |
Lul Rob is lucky,
I agree with this, but Joe, he'll still be back.
By Mickey on 14/02/2009
| QUOTE (Lefty2802 @ February 14, 2009 04:57 am) |
| Sweet. Now people are banned. Maybe people will now take you and their words more seriously. |
Agreed.
By Indivi2you on 14/02/2009
Hmm... It is for the best of WG, even if some people don't always like it.
Ok.
Ok.
By Ragingwealth on 14/02/2009
Okidokie
By Billy on 14/02/2009
Good 
!
! By Renegade3540 on 14/02/2009
I agree with this change (Zomg I agree with a leadership decision @@@)
It's for the better.
It's for the better.
By Mojohaza1 on 14/02/2009
sounds like a good idea to me
By Ansatsublade on 14/02/2009
Read, and agreed.
By Havochaha on 14/02/2009
ffs now icant get banned again
By Mmangler on 14/02/2009
OK bans are permanent but I noticed that you said that awful anatomical things would happen if you reversed a fair ban. So I guess that a higher level of diligence will be implemented to make sure that bans are fair so that reversal and dire physical consequences do not occur. 
By WG_Aaron on 14/02/2009
Don't really have an opinion. I guess the admin was elected for a reason.
By Starzhine on 14/02/2009
So long as it is a fair ban, and not one based on a personality dispute, I totally and completely agree.
WG
WG
By rachellove9 on 14/02/2009
Read and disagree. *Looks at Rob* Sometimes things work out for the best in WG
By Ragingwealth on 14/02/2009
| QUOTE (rachellove9 @ February 14, 2009 06:57 pm) |
| Read and disagree. *Looks at Rob* Sometimes things work out for the best in WG |
Changes should only affect the future though, Rob already rejoined and that's in the past :/
Rob isn't the only person who got unbanned in the past too lol.
By rachellove9 on 14/02/2009
| QUOTE (Ragingwealth @ February 14, 2009 02:35 pm) | ||
Changes should only affect the future though, Rob already rejoined and that's in the past :/ Rob isn't the only person who got unbanned in the past too lol. |
So only those banned after Rick Hamm are the ones that cannot be unbanned? Seems like a funny way to be.
I still disagree. I don't want Elias to lose his parts down the road when he realizes that someone was banned, changed and now he wants him/her back. As council and members change, so must the rules adapt to it.
By Kero2 on 14/02/2009
Seems more of a big change then little lol
By Kiwi011 on 15/02/2009
ONLY THOSe AFTER RICK RIGHT? THANK GOD.
By Reticked on 15/02/2009
By Jayson on 15/02/2009
/me gets the acid ready
this is good, but i still think at least 1 person will return from a ban
this is good, but i still think at least 1 person will return from a ban
By Ubg-Fcbruges on 15/02/2009
Good 
By Quikdrawjoe on 15/02/2009
| QUOTE (Leecable @ February 14, 2009 10:33 am) | ||
Lul Rob is lucky, I agree with this, but Joe, he'll still be back. |
I didn't say anything
By Planolocal on 15/02/2009
thats a big 10-4
By rachellove9 on 16/02/2009
| QUOTE (Kiwi011 @ February 14, 2009 07:34 pm) |
| ONLY THOSe AFTER RICK RIGHT? THANK GOD. |
That's how I read it. Only affects the new bans, cause now we know what awaits us. With it being that way seems fair enough.
By DZ on 16/02/2009
I like this idea. Happy to see it being implemented.
By David on 17/02/2009
Good move. Should instill some more discipline, and hopefully make people be aware of how they're acting. Hopefully it works the way it should.
By Pazenon on 17/02/2009
Great decision, this should consequently reduce the offences from different members.
By Firelion08 on 18/02/2009
Small change this is not.
Back to Topic Index